any ambiguity in a contract is interpreted against the party who drafted the contract course hero

A contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain what the intent of the parties was and the contract is capable of more than one reasonable interpretation. Sometimes ambiguous terms can be explained by the admission of parol evidence. Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it.

Full Answer

What happens if a contract is ambiguous?

Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. Also, sometimes the background or circumstances surrounding the contract can eliminate ambiguity.

Can a contract be interpreted against the drafter?

Most people are familiar with the legal rule that requires interpreting the contract against the drafter. Generally speaking, when applied this rule requires that any ambiguity or other contract terms which are subject to multiple reasonable interpretations will be given the interpretation which works against the party who drafted the document.

What is the rule of multiple reasonable interpretations of contracts?

Generally speaking, when applied this rule requires that any ambiguity or other contract terms which are subject to multiple reasonable interpretations will be given the interpretation which works against the party who drafted the document. This rule is all but built into our DNA when we contemplate entering into a contract.

Who is given the benefit of the doubt when drafting a contract?

In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. Also, sometimes the background or circumstances surrounding the contract can eliminate ambiguity. For example, in a Minnesota case, suit was brought in Minnesota on a Canadian policy of insurance.

What is the legal rule that requires interpreting the contract against the drafter?

Generally speaking, when applied this rule requires that any ambiguity or other contract terms which are subject to multiple reasonable interpretations will be given the interpretation which works against the party who drafted the document.

What is the last resort clause in contract law?

In contract law, it takes a long time to reach that “last resort.”. The Court or fact finder must first agree that the clause is ambiguous, difficult to discern, or subject to multiple interpretations.

What is the rule of Klapp v. Michigan?

Michigan courts have consistently declared that this rule is only to be applied if all conventional means of contract interpretation, including the consideration of relevant extrinsic evidence, have left the jury unable to determine what the parties intended their contract to mean. Klapp v.

Is a rule of last resort a rule of interpretation?

In other words, this is a rule of last resort, and it really isn’t even a rule of interpretation at all. Rather, it is a rule of “legal effect” which imposes an interpretation on a party when all other legal means of interpreting the contract fail. In contract law, it takes a long time to reach that “last resort.”.

Can you enter into a contract under the belief that any nasty clauses will be construed against the party?

Some people may indeed enter into a contract under the belief that any nasty clauses will be construed against the party imposing those clauses. Nonetheless, any expectation we may have that our reading of the contract will be “saved” by this rule should be minimized, because the rules in Michigan militate against that result.

What is the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it?

Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. Also, sometimes the background or circumstances surrounding the contract can eliminate ambiguity.

What is ambiguity in a contract?

A contract is ambiguous when it is uncertain what the intent of the parties was and the contract is capable of more than one reasonable interpretation. Sometimes ambiguous terms can be explained by the admission of parol evidence. Also, Courts abide by the rule that an ambiguous contract is interpreted against the party who drafted it. In other words, the party who did not draft the contract will be given the benefit of the doubt so to speak. Also, sometimes the background or circumstances surrounding the contract can eliminate ambiguity. For example, in a Minnesota case, suit was brought in Minnesota on a Canadian policy of insurance. The question arose as to whether the dollar limit of the policy referred to Canadian dollars or American dollars. The Court concluded that Canadian dollars were intended since the insurer and the insured were both Canadian corporations, the policy was entered into in Canada, and over the years premiums had been paid in Canadian dollars, and a prior claim on the policy had been settled by using Canadian dollars.

What is an example of a contract that has two interpretations?

An example of this would be preprinted insurance policies. Any clause which is capable of two interpretations will usually be interpreted against the insurer and in favor of the insured.

What does it mean when a contract does not state its duration?

For example, if a contract does not state its duration, the Court may imply that the contract is to be performed or continue for a reasonable time — reasonable in relation to the type of contract that it is.

Why do courts imply a term?

Sometimes a Court may imply a term to cover a situation where the parties fail to provide the term. The Court may also imply a term if it’s necessary to give a contract a construction or meaning that is reasonable.

When a contract to purchase a house is made subject to the condition that the buyer can obtain financing, must the?

For example, when a contract to purchase a house is made subject to the condition that the buyer can obtain financing, the buyer must make a reasonable good faith effort to obtain the financing or be held in breach of the contract.

When is a term not implied?

However, a term will not be implied in a contract when the Court concludes that the parties intended for the contract to be silent on a particular point. In every contract there exists an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.