Summary of common flaws Flaw Explanation Causation/correlation This is an important type of overlooked ... Sampling The arguer draws a general conclusion ba ... Ad hominem The arguer attacks another arguer instea ... Quantity versus percent The arguer treats quantities and percent ... 5 more rows ...
Discover why more than 20 million students and educators use Course Hero. The largest (and best) collection of online learning resources—guaranteed. Hundreds of expert tutors available 24/7.
The flawed reasoning is more similar to A if we look at the fact that he gets effected in the policy he is proposing albeit not in the same way one is negative and one is positive....but the flaw in reasoning still matches.
Sampling flaws occur when an argument extends limited information and tries to apply it more widely than is reasonable or justifiable. A shift from evidence to conclusion during which the arguer assumes—but doesn't demonstrate—that one is acceptably representative of the other
Ad hominem. You can most easily observe an ad hominem flaw when: An arguer criticizes someone's actions as a reason to not heed their argument. An arguer criticizes someone's character as a reason to not heed their argument. An arguer criticizes someone's motives as a reason to not heed their argument.
A faulty analogy is a type of Scope Shift, in that the arguer compares two things or two situations, but the two things or situations being compared aren't sufficiently alike.
Lack of evidence as proof. The arguer takes a lack of evidence for a conclusion as if that conclusion is definitely wrong. Also known as taking an absence of evidence for "evidence of absence". Example: Alien life has never been discovered, so it's clear that alien life doesn't exist. False dichotomy.
A shift from specific evidence to a general conclusion (for example, the evidence is about three doctors and the conclusion is about all doctors) A shift from evidence to conclusion during which the arguer assumes—but doesn't demonstrate—that one is acceptably representative of the other.
Corrupt, unintelligent, biased people can make valid arguments. Moreover, if someone’s a hypocrite ( they act in a different way than what they advise), it doesn’t mean they’re wrong.
Morgan, who bailed out the government in 1895, often provided lines of credit to provide stability in the financial sector. The 1913 Federal Reserve Act, signed into law by President Woodrow Wilson, gave the Fed the ability to print money and policy tools to ensure economic stability. 2 3 .
1 . Before 1913, financial panics were common occurrences because investors were unsure of the safety of their bank deposits. Private financiers such as J.P. Morgan, who bailed out the government in 1895, often provided lines of credit to provide stability in ...
The Federal Reserve System created the dual mandate to maximize employment and keep prices stable. 4 . The Federal Reserve Act is perhaps one of the most influential laws concerning the U.S. financial system.