course hero the first clear evidence of social inequality in egypt is seen in which period(s):

by Prof. Terry Halvorson MD 7 min read

Full Answer

What is an example of social inequality in ancient Egypt?

Competition and the aggrandizement of rulers is represented by high-status burials, such as Cemetery T at Naqada, whose graves were even larger, contained more grave goods and had larger, internally divided rooms. Unequal distribution of wealth is also often an indicator of social inequality.

Which two cultures seem to have characteristics of social inequality?

The two cultures that seem to have characteristics of social inequality were the Mesopotamian Ubaid (6500-3800 BCE) and Egyptian Badarian (5000-4000 BCE) cultures. During this time, many other cultures in the Near East had adopted agriculture and began to live in villages.

Is Egypt’s inequality worse than other poor countries?

Research shows that, compared to most poor countries, Egypt’s income inequality was low at this time, was not worsening, and its poverty rate was actually falling. Egypt is a prime case of what the World Bank calls “the [Middle East and North Africa (MENA)] inequality puzzle.”

Did inequality of opportunity lead to the Egyptian revolt?

But the fact that the index declined over time seemed inconsistent with the notion that the Egyptian revolt was the result of rising inequality of opportunity that boiled over in January 2011. Closer examination revealed a different trend, one that is more consistent with this proposition.

Origins

The earliest evidence for social inequality come from southern Mesopotamia and southern Egypt (i.e., Upper Egypt). The two cultures that seem to have characteristics of social inequality were the Mesopotamian Ubaid (6500-3800 BCE) and Egyptian Badarian (5000-4000 BCE) cultures.

Ubaid

Figure 1. Distribution of the Ubaid culture in the 6th and 5th millennium BCE

Badarian Culture

Figure 2. An object found in a Badarian grave, which can be used to distinguish differences between graves and burial goods

Spread of Social Inequality

What appears to have happened is that these two regions in southern Mesopotamia and Egypt developed social inequality through preferential treatment of given individuals or elites. Then, these societies began to both become influential in the wider region.

Conclusion

Social inequality does not seem to be a natural development in many parts of the word, where often we see societies are often configured differently into more egalitarian structures, although there might be differences in status among individuals. However, major differences between individuals are first noticeable in southern Mesopotamia and Egypt.

How many points does the Gini index of inequality in Egypt have?

Extending the conventional household expenditure and income surveys to capture top incomes has raised the Gini index of inequality up by as much as 15 points, but this does not challenge Egypt’s relative position based on standard surveys.

What is inequality of opportunity?

Thanks to pioneering work by John Roemer, we can actually measure this type of inequality, known as inequality of opportunity, as the share of inequality in a specific outcome—education or income—explained by circumstances beyond a person’s control, such as gender, ethnicity, and family background, to total inequality.

What was the Egyptian revolt of 2011?

For this plausible generalization, the Egyptian revolt of January 2011 is a puzzle. Research shows that, compared to most poor countries, Egypt’s income inequality was low at this time , was not worsening, and its poverty rate was actually falling.

image

Origins

  • The earliest evidence for social inequality come from southern Mesopotamia and southern Egypt (i.e., Upper Egypt). The two cultures that seem to have characteristics of social inequality were the Mesopotamian Ubaid (6500-3800 BCE) and Egyptian Badarian (5000-4000 BCE) cultures. During this time, many other cultures in the Near East had adopted agri...
See more on dailyhistory.org

Ubaid

  • What this suggests is that there might not be a clear reason as to why humans begin to have large-scale social inequality. Whatever the reason may have been, the evidence for social inequality is evident by the 6-5th millennium BCE. Perhaps some of the clearest evidence for this in the Ubaid culture (Figure 1) comes from the development of religious institutions. Here, we be…
See more on dailyhistory.org

Badarian Culture

  • While the Ubaid was developing into a society where inequality emerged, in Egypt during the late 5th millennium BC levels of social inequality are also evident. However, unlike southern Mesopotamia, here we see inequality emerging based on how individuals were buried. Settlements in the Badarian culture are largely unknown; therefore, graves are used as indicator…
See more on dailyhistory.org

Conclusion

  • Social inequality does not seem to be a natural development in many parts of the word, where often we see societies are often configured differently into more egalitarian structures, although there might be differences in status among individuals. However, major differences between individuals are first noticeable in southern Mesopotamia and Egypt. These societies spread and …
See more on dailyhistory.org

Related DailyHistory.org Articles