which definition of ‘evidence’ that we considered is undermined by this case? course hero

by Dr. Salvador Kris Jr. 4 min read

Can a statement be admitted as evidence in a criminal case?

Jul 20, 2019 · “It will be tougher and more subtle to define than physical abuse. It's a concept that raises complicated social and legal questions. But we do know that parents can abuse children psychologically, either through ignorance or cruelty, and there should be ways of making them responsible for their actions”[ CITATION Man79 \l 1033 ]. I do think that the judge would hear …

What are the requirements of documentary evidence?

The admissibility of electronic evidence: Photographs: Photographs may sometimes constitute real evidence, particularly where the physical photograph itself is central to the case, either because, for example, (a) it has fingerprints on its surface (i.e. the subject of the photograph is immaterial), or (b) because it is a rare historical photograph that was stolen from a museum, or …

When is documentary evidence admissible in court?

safety is at risk. Rosato debunks this claim by mentioning Germany and the United States conflict in World War II. As Germany progressively changed their beliefs and policies, the relationship between Germany and the United States started to diminish. American leaders justified the war on Germany because they stopped viewing Germany as a democracy. . This contradicts the claim …

What are the exceptions to the opinion evidence rule?

have developed along two lines: one set of rules for experts and one set of rules for non-experts. "Evidence of what the witness thinks, believes, or infers, in regard to facts in dispute" is a definition of: opinion evidence. The traditional evidence rule is that a non-expert, or lay, witness may state a relevant opinion if:

Is documentary evidence admissible?

Documentary evidence is not admissible until it has been authenticated. This means that: competent evidence must be introduced to show that the writing is genuine and that it is what it purports to be. A handwritten document must be authenticated before it can be considered for admission into evidence.

Why is hearsay evidence inadmissible?

admissible because it is a description of an outward manifestation drawn from observed facts if the witness cannot adequately describe the facts. One of the reasons for the general rule that hearsay evidence is inadmissible is: the out-of-court declarant is not under oath to speak the truth.

What is testimonial privilege?

A privilege that prohibits evidence of some communication from being disclosed in open court: has the effect of keeping from introduction to court highly believable and trustworthy evidence. Some testimony, even though relevant, is not admitted at trial because of what is known as the testimonial privilege rule.

What is the testimony of witnesses?

testimony of witnesses must be confined to statements of concrete facts within their own knowledge, observations, and recollection. Courts and legislatures have approved exceptions to the opinion evidence rule. These rules of exception:

What is a lay witness?

A nonexpert, or lay witness, is one who is not particularly skilled, learned, or experienced in the particular area that is at issue in the court, and may have knowledge that an average person possesses. He or she may testify concerning: the color of a car involved in a hit-and-run accident.

What is the hearsay rule?

hearsay. The hearsay rule: has many exceptions, based on reason and necessity. When considering the history of the hearsay rule: judges and court rule makers have recognized that the exceptions to the rule had to be recognized because of the harshness of a rule that prohibits the use of all hearsay evidence.

What is competent evidence?

competent evidence must be introduced to show that the writing is genuine and that it is what it purports to be. A handwritten document must be authenticated before it can be considered for admission into evidence. In order to authenticate a handwritten document, the party offering the document:

What is the integrity of evidence?

Integrity of evidence refers to the requirement that any item introduced in. court must be in the same condition as when it was found at the crime scene. This is documented by the chain of evidence, also referred to as the. individual. The size and shape of chips and wear patterns in the blade of a.

What is latent fingerprint?

latent prints. This type of fingerprint, which is not readily visible, consists of impressions of. the ridges of the fingers, transferred to other surfaces by sweat on the ridges. of the fingers or because the fingers carry residue of oil, blood, dirt or. another substance.

What is the Federal Rule of Evidence 803?

Federal Rule of Evidence 803 (3) Then Existing mental, emotional, or physical conditions: A statements of the declarant's then existing state and mind, emotion, sensation, or physical condition (such as intent, plan, motive, design, mental feeling, pain, and bodily health.

What is the principle of witness testimony?

The Principle means courts use to guard against these risks, are the requirements that the witness testify under oath, which helps ensure sincerity, and that the witness be available for cross-examination, which can be used to test recollection. Click card to see definition 👆. Tap card to see definition 👆. True.

What is hearsay in federal court?

"Hearsay is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at a trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.". True.

What is the dying declaration exception?

The Exception defined by Rule 804 (b) (2), making admissible statements made by a victim or other person under the belief of impending death. Reason for the dying declaration exception.

What was the result of the Sixth Amendment?

The result was the adoption of the sixth amendment's confrontation clause, which was made part of the american bill of rights in 1791. True.

What did the English do to the colonies?

English settlers brought the concepts of impartial, independent juries and hearsay rules to the American colonies as part of the English Common Law system. After the American Revolutionary War, both the right to an impartial jury and he use of hearsay rules were made part of the American Legal System.