"when the authority accurately identifiies the morally "right" course of action"

What is a moral action?

Moral action involves taking the necessary steps to transform the intent to do the right thing into reality.

How does utilitarianism deem actions morally right or wrong?

Utilitarianism deems actions morally right or wrong by appealing to the fundamentally intuitive principle of maximizing good, therefore Utilitarianism, in its most basic form (Act Utilitarianism), would agree that the morally right action can be explained as that action which maximizes good.

Does morally right action maximize happiness?

In this way, the morally right action maximizes total happiness, also referred to as ‘utility’ within Utilitarianism, “Utility would enjoin… the happiness… of every individual” (11).

Is there a reductio ad absurdum between morality and legality?

This is intended as a reductio ad absurdum, and shows the problems that arise if we try to connect legality with emotion or morality. R. Dworkin does something rather novel and considers that, rather than being immoral, something could be from a different moral code (1977, p. 995).

When the authority accurately identifies the morally right course of action it refers to?

Moral judgment reflects whether the authority can accurately identify the "right" course of action. Moral intent reflects an authority's degree of commitment to the moral course of action.

What term describes a company's acknowledgment that it is accountable for its actions?

A company's acknowledgment that it is accountable for its actions is referred to as corporate. social exchange.

What is the first step of the four component model of ethical decision making?

Rest developed his Four-Component Model by asking: “What must happen psychologically in order for moral behavior to take place?” He concluded that ethical action is the product of these psychological subprocesses: (1) moral sensitivity (recognition); (2) moral judgment or reasoning; (3) moral motivation; and (4) moral ...

Which of the following are among the rules of procedural justice?

Procedural justice speaks to four principles, often referred to as the four pillars: 1) being fair in processes, 2) being transparent in actions, 3) providing opportunity for voice, and 4) being impartial in decision making.

What is accountability in business ethics?

Accountability is an acceptance of responsibility for honest and ethical conduct towards others. In the corporate world, a company's accountability extends to its shareholders, employees, and the wider community in which it operates. In a wider sense, accountability implies a willingness to be judged on performance.

What does it mean to be ethically accountable and socially responsible in globalizing society?

Social responsibility is an ethical theory in which individuals are accountable for fulfilling their civic duty, and the actions of an individual must benefit the whole of society. In this way, there must be a balance between economic growth and the welfare of society and the environment.

What is ethical decision making and action?

Ethical decision-making is based on core character values like trustworthiness, respect, responsibility, fairness, caring, and good citizenship. Ethical decisions generate ethical behaviors and provide a foundation for good business practices.

What are the four 4 stages of moral decision making?

Focusing on the process of understanding and resolving an ethical dilemma, James Rest (1994) developed a theoretical model of ethical decision making that involves four distinct psychological processes: moral awareness, moral judgment, moral intention, and moral action.

What is ethical decision making process?

Ethical decision making is the process in which you aim to make your decisions in line with a code of ethics. To do so, you must seek out resources such as professional guidelines and organizational policies, and rule out any unethical solutions to your problem. Making ethical decisions is easier said than done.

What is procedural and substantive justice?

Substantive justice is the justice administered according to rules of law, whereas due process or procedural justice is the just and fair process which brings this outcome. These outcomes depend upon the substantive function of the law.

What is procedural justice in ethics?

Procedural justice concerns the fairness and the transparency of the processes by which decisions are made, and may be contrasted with distributive justice (fairness in the distribution of rights or resources), and retributive justice (fairness in the punishment of wrongs).

What is meant by procedural justice?

Procedural justice focuses on the way police and other legal authorities interact with the public, and how the characteristics of those interactions shape the public's views of the police, their willingness to obey the law, and actual crime rates.

Q23 - Philosopher: An action is morally

I was a little confused on this question, I read the explanation but I think that I am not writing out the core correctly. Can you please write out the core and explain the "if and only if" part of the stimulus.

Re: June 07, S2, Q23 - Philosopher: An action is morally

This one is tough so bear with me on it for a second. There are a series of conditional relationships that we need to piece together in a specific pattern and some of the relationships are pretty tricky.

Re: Q23 - Philosopher: An action is morally

changsoyeon wrote: Is it because (B) doesn't tell us why the unchanged actions are also "right" instead of "wrong"? Assuming (B) doesn't really help us in making the author's conclusion, right?

Re: Q23 - Philosopher: An action is morally

The very end of the stimulus is where I got tripped up: "are also right." From the discussions above I see that everyone effortlessly equated MORALLY RIGHT = RIGHT.

What is moral action?

Moral action involves taking the necessary steps to transform the intent to do the right thing into reality.

What are the three things that turn moral intent into moral action?

Professor Hannah and his colleagues argue that it takes three things to turn moral intent into moral action, and those are moral ownership, moral efficacy, and moral courage . Fortunately, the teachings of behavioral ethics can bolster all three.

What is behavioral ethics?

Behavioral ethics draws upon behavioral psychology, cognitive science, evolutionary biology, and related disciplines to determine how and why people make the ethical and unethical decisions that they do. Much behavioral ethics research addresses the question of why good people do bad things.

What is moral efficacy?

Moral efficacy is a belief in our ability to act ethically and to induce others to do so in the face of moral adversity. Often people have an abstract desire to do the right thing, but just don’t feel empowered to resist all the forces of authority, conformity and the like that can make it difficult to do so.

Why is moral courage important?

Finally, moral courage is necessary to translate moral decisions into moral action. The late ethicist Rushworth Kidder defined moral courage as “a commitment to moral principles, an awareness of the danger involved in supporting those principles, and a willing endurance of that danger.”.

What is the No Child Left Behind Act?

Since the enactment of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), some parents, teachers, and administrators have taken their own stand against something that they believe is harmful for public education and American children: high stakes testing. Under NCLB, every child in the U.S. must achieve proficiency in reading and math. While each state can determine its own level of proficiency, a child’s ability to advance to the next grade level, and even graduate from high school, hinges on passing a standardized test. Across the U.S., children in minority communities have been more likely not to receive a diploma due to low-test scores on mandated exams.

When one supposes one has broken one's own moral code, what has actually occurred?

When one supposes one has broken one’s own moral code, what has actually occurred is not the breaking of said code, but a misunderstanding of what the code actually was. It may be said that the wrong-doing is that a law has been violated, and not the actual act performed per se.

What does Patrick Devlin think of morality?

But this does not make any sense. Morality is the internal sense of right and wrong peculiar to the individual; a result of teaching, upbringing, indoctrination, evolution even, and the human condition itself.

What did Lord Templeman say about consent?

Lord Templeman suggested that the issue of consent was irrelevant to the question of the illegality of an action , since the latter constitutes a breach of the peace. This traces back to high-minded English snobbery about a king needing able-bodied soldiers.

Why does Socrates decide that the act should be punished?

Despite this, he decides that the act should be punished because it just is illegal. He uses precedents rather than his own reasoning, and adds the charge that was famously imposed on Socrates: the corruption of youth, since members of the group were recruited aged 15.

Is morality a rationality?

But this is not so, since morality excludes rationality. It is rational to protect the self, to further the interests of the same. It is considered a good deed in the moral codes of many to perform acts that benefit others more than oneself. So there is no necessary connection between morality and rationality.

Is society more important than individual liberty?

The idea seems to be that a society is more important than its individuals. But this is, of course, erroneous, for it seems obvious, upon reflection, that there can be nothing more sacred than individual liberty. Ashworth suggests (2009, p.23ff) that we are morally responsible because of said individual autonomy.

Who said no one voluntarily does bad things?

Socrates said that no one voluntarily does bad things, and this is true. When people think they have done wrong, they really think that they have done wrong according to someone else’s code, or according to law, but it is in fact impossible for someone to act immorally on their own code.