The ordinary course of business defense is commonly argued as an exception by vendors. That defense protects payments, in all or part, received by an unsecured creditor within 90 days of the bankruptcy from recovery where the creditor establishes certain elements detailed below.
Legal Definition of ordinary course of business. : the usual manner and range of a business especially considered in relation to the amount, circumstances, and validity of a particular transfer the bankruptcy trustee voided a transfer that was not in the ordinary course of business — see also buyer in ordinary course of business.
The business and operations of the Specified Assets shall have been conducted in the Ordinary Course of Business up to and including Closing.. Buyers in the Ordinary Course of Business 4802.1 B-O-C-B Wins and 6 Del.. Pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions hereof, and subject to applicable Law, for as long as it remains a Qualifying Shareholder, Sanmina shall …
definition. In the Ordinary Course of Business means all such acts and transactions undertaken by the Company, including, but not limited to sale or purchase of goods, property or services, leases, transfers, providing of guarantees or collaterals, in the normal routine in managing trade or business and is not a standalone transaction.
Dec 21, 2018 · Dividing a Business in a Divorce In many cases, a business is considered community property in a divorce, which means both spouses have a 50 percent interest in the business. This is true if the business was created after the marriage, and it is true even if one spouse did not work in the business.
No Borrowing Base calculation shall include Collateral acquired in a Permitted Acquisition or otherwise outside the Ordinary Course of Business until completion of applicable field examinations and appraisals (which shall not be included in the limits provided above) satisfactory to Agent.
Ordinary Course of Business means any action taken by a Person that is in the ordinary course of the normal, day -to-day operations of such Person and is consistent with the past practices of such Person.
Authorizing the Banks to Continue to Maintain, Service, and Administer the Bank Accounts In the Ordinary Course of Business Is Also Appropriate and Warranted.
In the Ordinary Course of Business means in the ordinary course of business of Borrower and the Subsidiaries and on ordinary business terms.
Most court decisions dealing with the applicability of the subjective prong of the OCB defense have relied on the consistency in the timing of the alleged preference payments compared with the timing of payments during the parties’ prior course of dealing before the preference period. The courts have compared the timing of the payments made during and prior to the preference period based on a variety of methodologies that have sometimes led to conflicting decisions.
The OCB defense requires proof, by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) the alleged preferential transfer paid a debt that was incurred in the ordinary course of the debtor’s and creditor’s business or financial affairs— which merely requires proof of a trade creditor’s extension of credit terms to the debtor—and (2) that the transfer was either (a) made in the ordinary course of the debtor’s and creditor’s business or financial affairs (the “subjective” part of the OCB defense), or (b) made according to ordinary business terms (the “objective” part of the OCB defense).
There have not been many published decisions addressing the industry a creditor can rely on in attempting to prove the alleged preference payments were made according to ordinary business terms. Nonetheless, this issue has been consistently raised by both plaintiffs and defendants over the last few years and has introduced another layer of complexity into determining the applicability of the objective OCB defense.
New value that remains unpaid on the bankruptcy filing date always reduces preference liability. However, courts have reached conflicting holdings on whether new value that was ultimately paid during the preference period should reduce preference liability.
The paid new value defense has been further complicated where the new value was paid for or the creditor otherwise recovered the new value after the bankruptcy filing. This occurs where (1) a creditor received payment of the new value post-petition pursuant to court order, such as a critical vendor order, or (2) the creditor reclaimed the goods that were part of its new value defense, or (3) the debtor returned the new value to the creditor. The few courts that have addressed this issue have reached conflicting holdings over whether a creditor’s new value defense would be reduced by the debtor’s post-petition repayment or return of new value pursuant to a court order.
Satija v. C-T Plaster, Inc., aka Cen-Tex Plaster, Inc., et al. (In re Sterry Industries, Inc.), the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas court analyzed the subjective OCB defense by a defendant whose ownership, and course of dealing, had changed prior to the preference period. Sterry and the defendant had a business relationship for some time prior to Sterry’s bankruptcy filing. Up until six months before Sterry’s bankruptcy, each invoice was on “Net 30” terms. Sterry would generally mail a check to the defendant but sometimes a representative of the defendant picked up the check.
Another issue with selling the business is that market fluctuations can have a serious impact on the value of the business. Perhaps a business may not be valued very high during an economic downturn, but would be worth a considerably greater amount in a better economic climate.
When a couple goes through a divorce, assets and liabilities are split through a process called Equitable Distribution . Essentially, a court will classify property as either marital or separate, place a value on the property, and then distribute the property between the spouses.
Here’s an explanation of the most common divorce terminology you’re likely to encounter during your divorce. Absolute Divorce: The absolute ending of a marriage, leaving both parties free to remarry. Adversarial Divorce: When a couple cannot come to an agreement about the terms of their divorce.
Marriage breakdown is the sole ground for legally ending a marriage under the terms of Canada’s Divorce Act. Guardian-ad-Litem: A person appointed by a judge to prosecute or defend a case for a person legally unable to do so, such as a minor child. Hearing: Any proceeding before a judicial officer.
Ab Initio: Latin phrase meaning “from the beginning.”. Action: Lawsuit or proceeding in a court of law. Affidavit: Written statement of facts made under oath and signed before a notary public or other officer who has authority to administer oaths. Agreement: Verbal or written resolution of previously disputed issues.
Alimony Also known as “Spousal Support” or “Maintenance”. The standard is to give support to the spouse who needs it in order to keep the family on an equal setting – however, there is an underlying duty for each spouse to work towards being independent of each other. Annulment: The legal end of an “Invalid Marriage”.
Contempt of Court: The willful failure to comply with a court order, judgment, or decree by a party to the action. Contempt of Court may be punishable by fine or imprisonment. Contested Divorce: Any case where the judge must decide one or more issues that are not agreed to by the parties.
Court Order: A written instruction from the court carrying the weight of the law. Orders must be in writing. Anyone who knowingly violates a court order can be held in contempt of court. Cross Examination: The questioning of a witness presented by the opposing party on trial or at a deposition.
Decree: The final ruling of the judge on an action for divorce, legal separation, or annulment. Decree has the same meaning as judgment. Decree Nisi / Rule Nisi: An order by the court stating that a conditional divorce will become absolute by a certain date unless a party contests the order.
Legal and professional fees in divorce case not deductible as business expenses. The Tax Court held in Lucas, T.C. Memo. 2018 - 80, that a taxpayer could not deduct legal and professional fees incurred during his divorce that were not related to his business or attributable to the production of taxable income.
Attorneys' fees and other costs paid in connection with a divorce, separation, or decree of support are generally personal expenses and not deductible (Regs. Sec. 1. 262 - 1 (b) (7)). However, the regulations contain exceptions to this general rule, including an exception for costs attributable to the taxpayer's profit - seeking activities, ...
212 allows an individual to deduct all of the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred in (1) producing income; (2) managing, conserving, or maintaining property held for the production of income; or (3) determining, collecting, or refunding any tax.
Sky Lucas was an active partner in Vicis Capital LLC, an investment advisory partnership. Vicis received management and performance fees for its management of several investment funds. Vicis, vis - à - vis Lucas and his partners, elected to defer some of the management and performance fees earned during 2006, 2007, and 2008 from one of the funds. As a result of the 2008 financial crisis, the partnership began to liquidate and finally wind down operations in January 2010. The deferred fees were distributed to Vicis from the fund in February 2010.