An inductive argument is inductively strong when you have the following: If all its premises were true, then it its highly likely or probable that its conclusion would also true. “Strong” and “weak” are the terms used to describe the possibilities for the logical strength of inductive arguments. To determine if an argument is strong or weak:
Full Answer
Feb 13, 2017 · Student Answer: There is no strict line at which inductive arguments become strong; it is a matter of context. It is strong if it confers a 90% likelihood on its conclusion. It is only truly strong if the conclusion is absolutely certain. It has all true premises and the conclusion is likely. Student
Jun 12, 2018 · Question 15 1 1 pts What does it mean for an argument to be cogent It is from PHI 103 at Ashford University
Jun 03, 2019 · What does it mean for an argument to be inductively strong? The premises make the conclusion very likely to be true. 3. 4. This form of argument is an inductive form that reasons from the general to the specific. ... Course Hero is not sponsored or …
By contrast, an inductively strong argument with true premises provides good, but not conclusive grounds, for its conclusion. Since we have defined things so that inductively strong arguments are not de-ductively valid, we can think of arguments as arranged along a continuum of de-scending strength: 1. Deductively valid
An inductive argument is inductively strong when you have the following: If all its premises were true, then it its highly likely or probable that its conclusion would also true. “Strong” and “weak” are the terms used to describe the possibilities for the logical strength of inductive arguments.
An inductive argument is strong when, assuming the premises are true, it is improbable for the conclusion to be false. An inductive argument is weak when, assuming the premises are true, it is probable for the conclusion to be false. A further evaluation involves the actual truth of the premises.
If there is a general statement in the premises, the argument will always be inductive. If the conclusion of an argument is a generalization (all) from evidence in the premises (some), the argument will be inductive.
Definition: A strong argument is a non-deductive argument that succeeds in providing probable, but not conclusive, logical support for its conclusion. A weak argument is a non-deductive argument that fails to provide probable support for its conclusion.
Here are some examples of inductive reasoning: Data: I see fireflies in my backyard every summer. Hypothesis: This summer, I will probably see fireflies in my backyard. Data: Every dog I meet is friendly.Dec 7, 2021
There are a few key types of inductive reasoning.Generalized. This is the simple example given above, with the white swans. ... Statistical. This form uses statistics based on a large and random sample set, and its quantifiable nature makes the conclusions stronger. ... Bayesian. ... Analogical. ... Predictive. ... Causal inference.Sep 29, 2021
Inductive reasoning has many advantages over deductive reasoning when it comes to many issues. For example, inductive reasoning is often more available, robust, and persuasive. True or False: In the philosophy of science it is generally considered a good thing if a claim is falsifiable. TRUE.
Inductive reasoning involves starting from specific premises and forming a general conclusion, while deductive reasoning involves using general premises to form a specific conclusion. Conclusions reached via deductive reasoning cannot be incorrect if the premises are true.Nov 16, 2021