The literature identifies two avenues by which a heavier course load could affect a student’s performance. The first is a basic time allocation problem. The more courses students take, the less time they have to spend on each course.
Despite its unique challenges, the college environment offers abundant opportunity to positively impact physical activity, nutrition, and healthy weight management practices (Lowry et al., 2000). Consideration of these factors is critical for the development of effective weight gain prevention strategies, during the college freshman year.
“Our study suggests that [students who are overloaded] experience higher levels of stress and more physical problems like sweating, headaches, exhaustion, stomach problems, and/or sleeping difficulties,” notes Galloway.
Of those with complete data (N = 372; 41%), 16.9% were overweight and 4.7% obese at the start of college, but 28.5% were overweight and 7.5% obese by the end of freshman year (McNemar’s test, χ2= 47.93, P<.001).
There are various causes for weight gain during the freshman year, such as eating in dorms, social events, eating late at night, stress and emotional eating, increased alcohol intake, and decreased physical activity.
“Our study suggests that [students who are overloaded] experience higher levels of stress and more physical problems like sweating, headaches, exhaustion, stomach problems, and/or sleeping difficulties,” notes Galloway.
Studies have variously found that obese students -- and especially girls -- tend to have lower test scores than their slimmer peers, are more likely to be held back a grade, and are less likely to go on to college.
about 8 poundsMore often, studies have found, college freshmen gain about 8 pounds over the academic year. The new study — which followed freshmen at the University of Georgia (UGA), in Athens — found a similar pattern. Students gained 3 to 4 pounds, on average, during their first semester.
Work overload is the main cause of many job related attitudes i.e. stress, anxiety, resulting in poor performance and job dissatisfaction. From research and through common practice, it has been seen that work overload has negative effect on job satisfaction (Altaf and Atif Awan, 2011).
The consensus was that overloading is fine, as long as the student is able to handle the credits. “I think [overloading] is good, if you can handle it, it's good,” junior Summer Mills said. “Especially if you overload earlier on, it's better so you can have more chill [schedules] in your later years.”
BMI was significantly negatively correlated with student's final grades (P = 0.001 Pearson's r = − 0.190) and PSQs were positively correlated with final grades (P < 0.001; Pearson's r = 0.357). Our findings show a correlation between healthy body weight and improved academic performance.
An analysis of Health-Behaviours in School-based Children (HBSC) data shows that children with obesity have lower life satisfaction, and are more prone to being bullied by schoolmates. This can lead to lower class participation and reduced educational performance.
Time and motivation were barriers for physical activity. Seventy-three percent (14 out of 19) reported eating unhealthy foods. Lack of time and convenience were barriers to eating healthier. They showed a lack of knowledge on how to make healthy food choices.
Not all college students gain weight during their first year of school. The Journal of American College of Health reported that only half of college students gain weight during the school year. 15 pounds is actually a made up number that stuck. The phrase is commonly used throughout America.
Reporting in the Journal of American College Health, the research team found that about 70 percent of students gained a significant amount of weight between the start of college and the end of sophomore year.
The freshman 15 is actually a bit of a misnomer, with students typically only putting on around 8 pounds over their first year. But that’s a substantial amount of weight to gain, particularly for students who are already overweight. In the study, UGA researchers found that first-years do pack on pounds, about 3 on average over the course of the semester. But implementing healthy patterns early can help stave off that weight gain.
Despite meal plans and 24/7 access to some campus dining options, the study showed that neither meal plan status nor whether the student lived on campus or off significantly predicted weight gain. But lack of vigorous activity did.
The students’ increased BMI is obviously a concern, but we should really focus on a more holistic view of health , especially increasing moderate and vigorous activity for students. Establishing these good exercise habits now can have lifelong benefits.” — Yangyang Deng, lead author of the study
The transition to college brings tremendous life change, including stresses related to increased academic pressures, changes in peer and family social supports, and opportunities to participate in risky behaviors, such as alcohol and drug use (Lightfoot, 2001). Many of these may play a role in college weight gain. For instance, academic stress has been shown to lead to decreased exercise, poor nutrition and increased drug use among college undergraduates (Weidner et al., 1996). Yet, it is possible that weight gain is unrelated to the college environment, perhaps instead marking the beginning of a larger trend for weight gain through the young and middle adulthood years (Lewis et al., 1997). However, there is evidence suggesting college students are prone to experience greater weight gain than their non-college-attending peers, with college women gaining weight at a rate 36 times greater than age-matched community women (Hovell et al., 1985).
In Study 1, weight gain averaged 3.5 kg in females and males; in Study 2, weight gain averaged 1.6 kg for females and 2.5 kg for males. Students continued to gain weight their sophomore year, with females 4.2 kg and males 4.3 kg heavier than at start of college. Overweight/obesity rates increased from baseline to end of freshman year for Study 1 (21.6% to 36%) and Study 2 participants (14.7% to 17.8%).
A life course approach to obesity management suggests that risk factors and experiences earlier in ones life may impact long-term health and disease outcomes, with strategies aimed at altering early risk factors of youth leading to possible prevention or attenuation of obesity-related medical complications in later adulthood (Kuh & Ben-Shlomo, 2004). Identification of high risk time periods for weight gain will allow for better understanding of the contributors to weight gain and thus development of more effective prevention efforts. For this reason, it is important to gain a better understanding of critical periods for developing overweight and/or obesity and contributing to the upward weight trajectory of Americans.
While this is not ideal, the pattern of weight change is consistent across the two studies- and consistent with recent research reports (e.g., Holm-Denoma et al., 2008)- providing new knowledge on the patterning of college weight gain. A final limitation involves lack of body composition measurements (e.g., DEXA), which would have allowed for quantifying the extent changes in BMI were reflective of changes in adiposity relative to lean body mass (Hoffman et al., 2006).
There were no significant changes in height over the year for males (P=.99+) or females (P=.3). Thus, the changes in BMI parallel those observed for weight. For males, the mean BMI increased from 22.9±3.4 to 23.6±3.3, and among females from 21.9±3.0 to 22.5±3.0.
Results from these two studies add to our knowledge of freshman weight gain in several ways. First, they show that bothmales and females gain weight, with similar patterns observed over the freshman year and the greatest weight changes for both sexes occurring during the first semester. Second, our data suggest that students may not lose this weight over time. Rather, students, particularly males, continue to gain weight during their sophomore year, leaving over one quarter of them 7 kg heavier than when they began college. These results are consistent with Hovell and colleagues (Hovell et al., 1985), who found a mean rate of weight gain in females of 3 kg, declining to 0.5 kg during the sophomore year. Third, Study 2 found neither males nor females increased in height over the course of the freshman year. Thus, changes in BMI are likely reflective of weight gain.
This study examines the effects of college on weight over much of the life cycle. I compare weights for college students with their weights before and after college and with the weights of noncollege peers using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY).
Recent estimates suggest that 35 % of adult Americans are obese, which is roughly a 100 % increase from 25 years prior (Flegal et al. 2012 ). Those aged 18–29 (who include college students) form the age cohort experiencing the largest increase in obesity rates (Mokdad et al. 1999; Yakusheva et al.
Several studies have examined weight for college freshmen (Crombie et al. 2009 ); however, all have used small “convenience” samples of students attending a particular university, typically where the study’s researchers are employed.
I use NLSY97 data to examine college attendance and weight.
I use multivariate regression analysis to estimate the relationship between college attendance and weight. The key variables are a measure of weight ( W) and college attendance ( C ). Formally, consider an empirical model in which weight is regressed on college attendance:
First, I present weighted descriptive statistics for 17- to 23-year-old NLSY97 respondents in Table 1 for the full sample and separately for those who are enrolled and are not enrolled in college.
This analysis provides new estimates of the effects of college on weight. College students from the NLSY97 gain about 4 pounds during their freshman year and between 2 and 3 pounds during subsequent college years.
When Baum looked at the weights of male college students during their freshman, sophomore, junior and senior years of college as well as during the year immediately before college and the year immediately afterward, he found they had gained an average of 14.1 pounds over that six-year period. Their counterparts who did not attend college gained 14.8 pounds, on average. For women, the difference was much larger. Female college students gained an average of 8.3 pounds over the six years while women who did not go to college gained 14.6 pounds.
A new study suggests students gain about a pound – not 15 – during their first year of college. Also, young adults who attend college gain less weight than those who do not.
Individuals aged 17 to 23 who were enrolled in college weighed less than those who were not. College students in this age group weighed an average of 157.9 pounds compared to 168.4 pounds for individuals not in college.
The American Academy of Pediatrics stresses that healthy habits developed in childhood can last for many decades. But the transition from high school to college can prompt significant lifestyle changes as students become more independent from their parents, making their own decisions about what to eat and how to spend their time.
The American College Health Association is an advocacy group that focuses on the health needs of college students. It administers the National College Health Assessment, a survey of student health habits, behaviors and perceptions.
Having a college degree reduces the probability of becoming obese. For individuals who were between the ages of 25 and 31 in 1992 or 2010, college completion lowered their chances of being obese by about 7.5 percentage points. For individuals who were between the ages of 45 and 52 in 2010, the probability of becoming obese was slashed by two-thirds if they had earned a college degree.
To prevent weight gain during the first year in college, we have to understand factors causing body weight change and then develop appropriate intervention strategies. It is well documented that both an unhealthy diet and physical inactivity are closely related to body weight gain as they directly influence the energy balance of individuals ( Abbey et al., 2017; Plotnikoff et al., 2015 ). In regard to psychological factors that influence body weight, various health behaviour theories including the Health Belief Theory, Socioecological Model, Social Cognitive Theory and Transtheoretical Model have highlighted the importance of individuals’ knowledge, skills, attitude, self-efficacy and intention in behavioural practices ( Giles-Corti and Donovan, 2002; Glanz et al., 2002; Prochaska and Velicer, 1997 ). Previous studies provide evidence that these individual-level factors are associated with physical activity and dietary practices among the college student population ( Iwasaki et al., 2017; Kołłajtis-Dołowy and Żamojcin, 2016; Ranasinghe et al., 2016; Yan et al., 2014 ). For example, a recent study showed that a lack of nutrition knowledge was associated with higher fat consumption among college population ( Yahia et al., 2016 ); another study showed that self-efficacy was associated with different stages of physical activity behaviour among college students ( Horiuchi et al., 2017 ).
Specifically, health educators and promoters should consider helping college students overcome barriers such as lack of motivation to exercise by implementing more enjoyable exercise programmes. For students who perceive bad weather as a barrier to exercise, intervention might focus on building skills, confidence and enjoyment of indoor physical activities, particularly in colleges and universities in locations where winter is long and brutal. In addition, colleges should also make an effort to make the campus environment more conducive to healthy behaviours. For example, more indoor exercise facilities should be provided and cafeterias should provide a wider range of healthy food options. Meanwhile, helping students recognise healthy options in the environment is as important as building the positive environment, for example, informing students about indoor exercise programmes’ availability and their schedules, putting up a sign on how to make a healthy and delicious salad by the salad bar and so forth.
Transitioning from high school, college is an important turning-point of life for young adults to develop a healthy lifestyle. The ability to maintain healthy body weight at this time yields lifelong benefits. The results of this study provide useful information for health promotion professionals to help students to maintain healthy body weight. Traditional health education that focuses on knowledge and positive attitudes may not be effective for the college population. Instead, intervention should focus on overcoming personal barriers and building positive environmental perceptions.
It is well documented that overweight and obesity are associated with increases in the rates of diabetes, heart disease, hypertension and some cancers ( Holm-Denoma et al., 2008 ). Worldwide, as of 2016, 1.9 billion people over the age of 18 were classified as overweight, and 650 million were obese ( World Health Organization, 2017 ). This translates to 39% and 13% of the global population, respectively ( World Health Organization, 2017 ). In the USA, the obesity rate increased from 30% to 40% of the adult population and 15% to 20% of adolescents (age 12–18 years) between 2000 and 2016 ( Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2017 ). In the United Kingdom, approximately 22% of men and 23% of women aged between 16 and 24 years are overweight, and 17% of men and 15% of women between 16 and 24 years are obese ( Moody and Neave, 2016 ).
Health education and promotion professionals should guide students to overcome barriers to healthy eating and exercise, as well as making the campus environment more conducive to healthy behaviour.
The most promising and interesting findings were that, contrary to our expectations based on previous research, knowledge, attitude, intention and behavioural practices regarding physical activity and diet, and stress management when entering college did not predict weight change, except attitude towards physical activity. Instead, the major predictor of weight gain was the perception of barriers. Participants who gained weight perceived more personal barriers to undertake physical activity (i.e. lack of motivation) and eat healthily (i.e. lack of time for healthy eating). Both of these barriers have been previously identified as primary obstacles to adopting a healthy lifestyle ( Ebben and Brudzynski, 2008; Silliman et al., 2004; Yaemsiri et al., 2011 ).
However, the factors that predict their weight gain are unknown. The purpose of this study was to explore the predictors of weight gain among first-year college students at a US college over a 3-month period.
Anxiety is the most prevalent mental illness on college campuses due to the culture of non-stop learning and living. According to UI Associate Director of Student Health, Trish Welter, many UI students report feeling hopeless and overwhelmed. “You start to feel pressure from society to do something in college, in order to like get a good job, ...
Figueredo is not the only one who struggled with balancing school work and sleep. “I used to not privilege sleep enough, so I would stay up,” seconded senior Eleni Koutsonikolis. She elaborated to say that as the years went by, she had to make sleeping her first-priority for her well-being.
New research has shed some light on the reason behind this feeling and shows that overloading students causes not only academic stress, but also takes a toll on students’ mental and physical health, which, unsurprisingly, hinders learning.
Students also voiced their frustration with their workload, saying things like; “There’s never a time to rest, there’s always something more you should be doing;” “It can feel like you are drowning;” and “My body crashes when I’ve done maybe half of my homework.”
The study, led by Mollie Galloway from Lewis and Clark College, shows that although students who spend more time doing homework are sometimes more behaviourally engaged in school, they also tend to be more anxious, and report more physical symptoms due to stress.
Based on such student feedback, the researchers speculate that homework overload can actually limit a person’s capacity to learn.
Students and teachers should generally align in their description of the purpose of homework (that is, students should be able to identify the purpose) Teachers should not simply check-off homework as “complete” or “incomplete.”. Homework should be incorporated or utilized in the lesson to facilitate the learning experience.
The negatives of long time-to-degree are clear: earnings penalties for some (Witteveen and Attewell 2019 ), poorer overall performance, perhaps due to skill atrophy (Brugiavini et al. 2020 ), cohort crowding (Kurlaender et at. 2014 ), and additional financial cost in terms of tuition outlays and delayed entry into the labor market. One way to improve time to degree would be for institutions to support efforts to increase credits per semester. However, there is a concern that additional credits may harm student performance. We find no evidence that increased course load harms performance, which supports the use of time-to-degree policy that uses course load as a lever.
While academic momentum theory suggests that additional credits may also improve student performance, and there is a strong positive correlation between course load and student performance, high course load may reduce time investment in each course, giving high course load a negative causal effect on performance.
Must submit a Course Overload Petition in order to overload with 20-24 credits. (See information below for continuing students)
Students who enrolled (matriculated) at the University of Rochester prior to the fall 2021 semester will not be impacted by this new overload policy until fall 2022. For the spring 2021 semester, continuing students who wish to overload are subject to the GPA requirements noted above. A petition is not required for spring 2022, unless a continuing student wishes to overload in 25 or more credits.
Minimum of a 3.0 term grade point average (GPA) in the previous semester.
Enrollment in more than 24 credit hours is not permitted under the new policy once it is fully implemented.
Students are expected to discuss their plans to overload with an advisor (either College advisor, major advisor, or CCAS advisor) before submitting the petition.
Students auditing a course should make note of this restriction. Additionally, audited courses do not count toward full-time status. More information is available in the Advising Handbook under audits.
Seniors: Overloads in the senior year are subject to the same conditions above, but permissions for exceptions to these rules may be allowed based on the individual student’s circumstances (curricular, financial, etc.). In the overload petition, seniors must explain how the requested course overload is necessary to complete all graduation requirements by Commencement. Seniors in this situation are strongly encouraged to speak with an advisor in CCAS to discuss their plans for registration and graduation, including other possibilities to complete degree requirements.