Congress’ original goal of enacting the AMT was to ensure that very wealthy taxpayers do not escape tax liability through the abuse of tax preferences. However, the most economically sound way to achieve that was not to graft additional complexity onto the tax code.
Full Answer
IRS Tax Tip 2011-47 on the AMT – Here are six facts the Internal Revenue Service wants you to know about the AMT and changes for 2010. 1. Tax laws provide tax benefits for certain kinds of income and allow special deductions and credits for certain expenses.
Data source: IRS. It's important to point out that not everyone can deduct the AMT exemption from their alternative minimum taxable income. Specifically, if your income exceeds the annual phaseout ...
Alternative Minimum Tax - AMT: An alternative minimum tax (AMT) recalculates income tax after adding certain tax preference items back into adjusted gross income . AMT uses a separate set of rules ...
Congress enacted the modern alternative minimum tax (AMT) in 1979 to operate in tandem with the add-on minimum tax. The main preference items, including capital gains, moved from the add-on tax to the AMT. Congress finally repealed the add-on tax, effective in 1983.
AMT liability is the excess, if any, of this amount over the amount of tax owed under the regular income tax rules. Before the enactment of the TCJA, some of the larger AMT preference items included the deduction for state and local taxes (62 percent of all preferences in 2012 according to data from the US Department of the Treasury), ...
The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), included provisions that significantly reduced the impact of the AMT. The TCJA enacted a higher AMT exemption and a large increase in the income at which the exemption begins to phase out.
What is the AMT? A. The individual alternative minimum tax (AMT) operates alongside the regular income tax. It requires some taxpayers to calculate their liability twice—once under the rules for the regular income tax and once under the AMT rules—and then pay the higher amount.
For singles and heads of household, the exemption rises from $54,300 in 2017 to $72,900 in 2020.
The AMT provisions, along with almost all other individual income tax measures in TCJA, are set to expire at the end of 2025.
Congress subsequently enacted an “add-on” minimum tax that households paid in addition to regular income tax. It applied to certain income items (“preferences”) taxed lightly or not at all under the regular income tax. The largest preference item was the portion of capital gains excluded from the regular income tax.
Congress enacted the AMT in 1969 following testimony by the Secretary of the Treasury that 155 people with adjusted gross income above $200,000 had paid zero federal income tax on their 1967 tax returns. (See Appendix for the AMT’s legislative history.)
First, by broadening the definition of income and eliminating tax preferences it would preserve the AMT’s goal of minimizing tax avoidance by wealthy taxpayers. Second, a broad er tax base would allow revenue-neutral reductions in marginal rates. Since high marginal rates provide the main incentive for tax evasion, rate reductions reduce the incentives for tax evasion to begin with.
The AMT consists of two tax brackets—26 percent for incomes below $175,000, and 28 percent for incomes above. It allows a standard exemption that exempts most low-income taxpayers—$45,000 for those who are married filing jointly and $33,750 for most other taxpayers in 2005.
A far more important factor causing the AMT’s recent expansion is the effect of the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts. Ironically, by reducing regular income tax liabilities without substantially changing the AMT, the Bush tax cuts will be responsible for most of the expansion of the AMT through 2011 (see Figure 1). Since taxpayers must pay the greater of either their AMT or regular tax liability, the decline in income tax liability without any change in the AMT pushed many taxpayers into the AMT.
The AMT is a tax system that is parallel to the regular income tax. It was originally designed to capture a small number of wealthy taxpayers who were avoiding income taxes, but the AMT’s reach has ballooned in recent years. Until recently, the AMT affected less than 1 percent of taxpayers.
Figure 2 divides the number of AMT payers by the roughly 131 million total tax returns filed in 2003. However, more than 40 million of those tax filers paid zero income tax in that year, as they have been removed from the income tax base thanks to various credits and deductions.
One advantage of repeal is that it would help refocus tax reform efforts on broadening the tax base and lowering rates in the regular income tax system. Congress’ original goal of enacting the AMT was to ensure that very wealthy taxpayers do not escape tax liability through the abuse of tax preferences.
Congress enacted the modern alternative minimum tax (AMT) in 1979 to operate in tandem with the add-on minimum tax. The main preference items, including capital gains, moved from the add-on tax to the AMT. Congress finally repealed the add-on tax, effective in 1983.
AMT liability is the excess, if any, of this amount over the amount of tax owed under the regular income tax rules. Before the enactment of the TCJA, some of the larger AMT preference items included the deduction for state and local taxes (62 percent of all preferences in 2012 according to data from the US Department of the Treasury), ...
The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), included provisions that significantly reduced the impact of the AMT. The TCJA enacted a higher AMT exemption and a large increase in the income at which the exemption begins to phase out.
What is the AMT? A. The individual alternative minimum tax (AMT) operates alongside the regular income tax. It requires some taxpayers to calculate their liability twice—once under the rules for the regular income tax and once under the AMT rules—and then pay the higher amount.
For singles and heads of household, the exemption rises from $54,300 in 2017 to $72,900 in 2020.
The AMT provisions, along with almost all other individual income tax measures in TCJA, are set to expire at the end of 2025.
Congress subsequently enacted an “add-on” minimum tax that households paid in addition to regular income tax. It applied to certain income items (“preferences”) taxed lightly or not at all under the regular income tax. The largest preference item was the portion of capital gains excluded from the regular income tax.