Scrum Anti Patterns are behaviors that the team members exhibit that would drain the resources from the Scrum Team in the long run. Keeping an eye out for such behaviors in the Scrum Team would enhance the productivity and performance of Developers.
Here Scrum is described as easy to understand, lightweight, and difficult to master. Hence, beginners use some Scrum practices and mechanically use them without knowing the underlying principles.
No longer mandatory since the 2020 edition of the Scrum Guide is that the Scrum team agrees to tackle at least one high-priority improvement issue from the previous Sprint Retrospective. The Scrum Guide characterizes the Sprint Planning as follows:
As stated in the Scrum Guide, Scrum is a framework where people can address complex problems productively and creatively by delivering products of the highest value. Here Scrum is described as easy to understand, lightweight, and difficult to master.
The following anti-patterns focus on the mishandling of the Sprint itself: Flow disruption: The Scrum Master allows stakeholders to disrupt the flow of the Scrum Team during the Sprint. ... Lastly, the Scrum Master allows either stakeholders or managers to turn the Daily Scrum into a reporting session.
TL; DR: Scrum Master Anti-Patterns The reasons Scrum Masters violate the spirit of the Scrum Guide are multi-faceted. Typical Scrum Master anti-patterns run from ill-suited personal traits to complacency to pursuing individual agendas to frustration with the team itself.
Anti-patterns in agile or scrum anti-patterns are (bad) practices that you follow to improve the process. Still, they do the opposite by hampering your efforts and slowing your progress towards achieving Agile goals.
The top three Sprint Retrospective anti-patterns from my perspective are: not making the retrospective a safe place, unequally distributed speaking time, and a ritualized format that never changes.
Typical scrum anti-patterns include: turning stand-ups into status meetings, monologues from team members that take too much time to answer, extra-long stand-ups, team members interrupting each other, boring disengaging stand-ups, overly focused on the past stand-ups, and stand-ups with too many unnecessary ...
Nevertheless, some Product Owner anti-patterns during the Daily Scrum may be as follows: Planning meeting: The PO hijacks the Daily Scrum to discuss new requirements, refine new work items, or have a micro (Sprint) planning meeting. The talkative PO: The Product Owner actively participates in the Daily Scrum.
Let's discuss the six most common types of anti-patterns and their solution in software development.Spaghetti Code. This is one of the most common types of anti-pattern you will find in software development. ... Golden Hammer. ... Boat Anchor. ... Dead Code. ... God Object and God Class. ... Copy and Paste Programming.
Wikipedia defines the term “Anti-pattern” as follows: “An anti-pattern is a common response to a recurring problem that is usually ineffective and risks being highly counterproductive.”
For a Scrum team to operate successfully, the entire team—including product owner, cross-functional development team, and ScrumMaster—must honor the Scrum values of commitment, courage, focus, openness, and respect.
The Scrum sprint retrospective is a timeboxed meeting that takes place after the sprint review and before sprint planning. Its purpose is to: Examine how the just-completed sprint went as far as people, relationships, processes, and tools. Identify and order what went well. Do the same with things that didn't go well.
DON'T turn the Retrospective into witch hunt If the meeting will turn into a witch hunt, people will become defensive, uncooperative and in some cases even hostile. Negative emotions and feelings towards team members will destroy team spirit and can be a threat to future collaboration.
Product owners are full, first-class team members. It's critical that they participate in retrospectives and they are as open as everyone else to hearing things they can do to improve. Teams that don't include their product owner tend to suffer from us vs. them thinking that is almost always harmful to the project.