which of the following is not true of the premises for an argument course hero

Can the premises be true when the conclusion is false?

Start studying The Premise of an Argument. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Home. Subjects. Explanations. Create. Study sets, textbooks, questions ... If the argument is valid and you accept that the premises are true. A good, convincing argument is: Sound. Validity + True Premises= Sound. Example ...

When is an argument that concludes a is G not valid?

the statement in an argument that the premises are claimed to provide support for, or imply. ... The component of a conditional statement immediately following the word "if"; (2) the component of a conditional statement to the left of the horseshoe. ... has all true premises, and meets the total evidence requirement. Uncogent Argument.

What are the premises of a deductively valid argument?

Example of an inductively strong, cogent argument is: Most recording artists have talent. Britney Spears is a recording artist. Therefore, Britney Spears probably has talent. (b/c it is strong with all true premises) Example of an inductively strong, incogent argument is: Most boys like to play sports. Britney Spears is a boy.

What does the truth of the premises guarantee?

valid argument. a deductive argument that succeeds in providing logical conclusive support for its conclusion. -The conclusion logically follows from the premises. -a deductively valid argument is such that if its premises are true, its conclusions must be true. That is,if the premises are true, there's no way that the conclusion can be false.

What is a cogent argument?

Cogent Argument: (1)strong. (2)has all true premises. Example of an inductively strong, cogent argument is: Most recording artists have talent. Britney Spears is a recording artist. Therefore, Britney Spears probably has talent. (b/c it is strong with all true premises) Example of an inductively strong, incogent argument is:

Does B/C conform to textbook model?

No, b/c does not conform to textbook model.

Is Sominex a fallacious argument?

(It's saying it will help you sleep well, b/c it will help you sleep well) Argument from Dubious Authority: -This is a fallacious argument from authority.

What is the purpose of premises in argument?

premises are intended to provide logically conclusive support for its conclusion. -that is, the premises are intended to guarantee the truth of the conclusion. If premises are true, conclusion must be true. valid argument. a deductive argument that succeeds in providing logical conclusive support for its conclusion.

What is a strong argument?

strong argument. an inductive argument that succeeds in providing probable-but not conclusive-logical support for its conclusion.

What is truth preserving?

truth-preserving. a characteristic of a valid deductive argument in which the logical structure guarantees the truth of the conclusion if the premises are true. invalid argument. a deductive argument that fails to provide logical conclusive support for its conclusion.

What is a deductive argument?

a deductive argument that succeeds in providing logical conclusive support for its conclusion. -The conclusion logically follows from the premises. -a deductively valid argument is such that if its premises are true, its conclusions must be true.

How to check validity of a parallel argument?

You check for validity by simply devising a parallel argument that has the same form of the argument you're evaluating (the test argument) but has obviously true premise and false conclusion.

Can an argument have a true conclusion?

True or False. A valid argument can have true premises and a false conclusion.

Is it possible to have a deductively valid argument?

No, it's not possible. A deductively valid argument is such that if the premises are true , its conclusion must be absolutely, positively be true.

What is an argument from premises about a sample to conclusions about the whole class?

Arguments from premises about a sample to conclusions about the whole class are inductive.

Which argument always provides more reason for its conclusions?

Deductive arguments always provide more reason for their conclusions than inductive arguments do.

What does "probably" mean in an argument?

The word "probably" suggests that this argument is not intended as a valid proof of its conclusion. When an argument is valid, it is necessary—not just probable—that the conclusion is true if the premises are true. Thus, if an arguer says only that the conclusion is probably true given the premises, then that person does not intend the argument to be valid. This makes the argument inductive.

Why is an argument deductive?

Deductive. This argument is valid because its conclusion can never be false while both of its premises are true. To see this, just try to tell a coherent story where the premises are all true and the conclusion is false. You can't, so the argument is valid. Almost all arguments that are valid were intended to be valid. Hence, this argument was probably intended to be valid. That makes it deductive.

Is inductive strength defeasible?

True. To say that inductive strength is defeasible is to say that adding new premises can turn a strong inductive argument into a weak inductive argument. That is possible when the argument is not valid. The classic example is that many people observed thousands of swans throughout six continents and concluded that all swans are white. That was a decently strong inductive argument, because their sample was very large and diverse. But then they learned about black swans in Australia. As soon as they had that new information in their premises, they ceased to have any reason at all to believe that all swans are white.

When do arguments from premises about a sample to general conclusions about the whole class commit the fallacy of hasty

Arguments from premises about a sample to general conclusions about the whole class commit the fallacy of hasty generalization when the sample in the premises is biased.

When a poll asks a question that is slanted in order to reach a certain result,

When a poll asks a question that is slanted in order to reach a certain result, then the poll does not provide strong reason to believe the desired conclusion.