Which aspect of modern society endangers the functioning of an iron triangle from POLS 210 at American Public University
Question 3 of 10 100 100 Points Which aspect of modern society endangers the. Question 3 of 10 100 100 points which aspect of. ... Question 3 of 10 10.0/ 10.0 Points Which aspect of modern society endangers the functioning of an iron triangle? ... Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. ...
Question 8 of 10 100 100 Points Which aspect of modern society endangers the from POLS 210 at American Public University
Oct 07, 2016 · Question 4 of 10 100 100 Points Which aspect of modern society endangers the from POLS 210 at American Public University
The iron triangle created by these three groups (special interest groups, Congress, and government bureaucracies and agencies) is strong because of their reliance on one another to achieve their own agendas. This runs the risk of de-prioritizing citizen needs in favor of political gains.
The term " iron triangle " is a term used to describe the dynamics of policy-making between special interest groups, Congress and governmental agencies. The interrelationship between these three factions can create a self-sufficient (and sometimes corrupt) sub governmental situation in which American citizens' best interests are ignored in favor ...
Special interest groups are a key element in the iron triangle because they can create a governmental situation in which their lobbyists have an undue influence on government. Here are some examples:
As such, the Sierra Club lobbies to have its goals met, including passing Cap and Trade to fight global warming. Government agencies and Congress may choose to respond to the needs of the Sierra Club, even if it puts them at odds with voters on key issues such as the Keystone Pipeline.
The Christian Coalition of America is a political organization that seeks to strengthen the values of Christian families.
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) is a special interest group that seeks to protect a group of people that have historically faced discrimination and, to this day, still experience a lack of equal opportunity.
Bureaucracies and Government Agencies. The third corner of the iron triangle are the government bureaucracies and agencies that function as the implementation arm of policies and procedures passed by Congress . Congress is their key source of funding. This synergistic effect can lead to decisions being implemented that may be in favor ...
The iron triangle is a mutually beneficial, three-way relationship between Congress, government bureaucracies, and special interest lobby groups. Each group does some action that will help the other group, creating a lasting and unbreakable bond between the three.
The lobbyist's goal is to represent his company and get legislative bills of interest to his company passed. According to the iron triangle theory, all three will work together so that all three can achieve their goals. It all comes to three relationships among the three groups.
But in the process, orchid bees help the flowers flourish by pollinating the female parts of other orchids.
The iron triangle is a give-and-take balance the project manager needs to master by manipulating variables that can change in order to allow for those that cannot. Together, balancing these three constraints can help determine the quality of the overall project. For example, if a project must be complete by a specific deadline, the scope may need to be reduced, or costs increased to accommodate additional resources or overtime. Or if a project cannot exceed a budget, the project manager may need to extend time to reduce overtime used.
This is the financial constraint of a project, also referred to as the budget. Costs on a project can comprise of a variety of elements, including resources – both materials and people – as well as any external costs that influence a project. In some cases, costs are fixed and cannot flex; in others, costs are variable and can be adjusted ...
Controlling scope is especially critical, as adjustments to scope almost guarantee an impact to cost and time. For example, if the original request requires 10 hours of work but a stakeholder requests another addition that represents another 10 hours, it’s likely that end project costs and time will increase.
Sometimes, the timeline on a project is concrete, adhering to a specific milestone or data. In other projects, the timeline can be more flexible. But just as budgets are seldom unlimited, clients seldom accept any delivery time.