which action is least likely to be taken by an imperial president? course hero

What is an imperial presidency?

Question 5 of 10 10.0/ 10.0 Points Which action is least likely to be taken by an “imperial” president? A. Selectively enforce policies based on personal politics. B. Defer to Congress on policy disagreements. C. Order troops without congressional authorization. D. Unilaterally modify drug policy through executive order. Answer Key: B

Is the imperial presidency a danger to America?

Nov 13, 2016 · Question 7 of 10 10.0/ 10.0 Points Which action is least likely to be taken by an “imperial” president? A.Order troops without congressional authorization. B.Selectively enforce policies based on personal politics. C.Unilaterally modify drug policy through executive order. D.Defer to Congress on policy disagreements.

Should power be concentrated in the hands of the President?

Jul 01, 2018 · Question 6 of 10 Which action is least likely to be taken by an imperial. Question 6 of 10 which action is least likely to be. ... Course Title POLS 210; Type. Test Prep. Uploaded By jacksonwoods. Pages 4 Ratings 100% (2) 2 out of 2 people found this document helpful;

Which presidents have shown similar tendencies?

Presidents such as Andrew Jackson and Franklin Delano Roosevelt showed similar tendencies. Often, war is cited as the reason for extraconstitutional action, such as Abraham Lincoln’s suspension of habeas corpus. “Imperial presidency” is not a term that reflects an actual royal ambition or the suspension of term limits.

What is the scariest statement?

It has long been said that one of the scariest statements is, “Trust us, we’re from the government.”. The deep American distrust for such a claim was shared by the framers, who rejected a government based on assurances of the best intentions.

What was James Madison's fear of the United States?

When James Madison shaped a new constitutional system for the United States, he and his fellow framers had one overriding fear: tyranny. They wanted to divide power between three branches and create lines of separation that prevented the concentration of power in any single branch.

Is the branch of government supposed to have enough power to govern alone?

No branch is supposed to have enough power to govern alone. Once power becomes concentrated in the hands of a president, citizens are left only with the assurance that such unchecked power will be used wisely – a Faustian bargain the framers repeatedly warned us never to accept.