what was the hollywood antitrust case? course hero

What are some of the most famous antitrust cases?

ANTITRUST CASE 2 Antitrust Case Analysis Overview of Antitrust Law Cases The first case that was chosen was Oscar Insurance Company of Florida (plaintiff) versus Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc (defendant). This case was over a matter the Oscar filed a claim stating that Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida was violating the Sherman Act and using coercion to …

Who enforces antitrust laws?

Antitrust Case Briefs the jury determination that Brown’s actions had a reasonable possibility of injuring competition should not have been overturned. Reversed. Bell Atlantic v. Twombly* United States Supreme Court 550 U.S. 544 (2007) Rule To state a claim under § 1 of the Sherman Act, the complaint must contain enough factual material to suggest that an agreement existed …

What is the scope of antitrust laws?

 · The case was initially heard in both the United States district court located in Newyork and then brought up to the United States Supreme Court for a further hearing . 2 . Relevant facts The big name film companies listed above all were in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act due to being involved in monopolistic practices in the film industry .

Why did the government sue the studios in 1938?

aka The Paramount Antitrust Case The famous entrance to the Paramount studio, the largest of the major film companies of the classic Hollywood era. The 1948 Supreme Court decision in …

When did the antitrust case come back?

The efforts by independent producers helped get the government’s antitrust case back into court in the fall of 1945. After a New York District Court handed down a guilty ruling (the terms of which nonetheless failed to satisfy the government and the independent producers), both sides submitted appeals that would eventually take the case all ...

What major studios were sued by the government?

In July 1938, the government reversed its stance toward Hollywood and filed its lawsuit against seven major studios: Paramount, Universal, MGM, Twentieth Century-Fox, Warner Bros., Columbia and RKO. The government’s case accused the studios of violating the Sherman Antitrust Act in their total control over movie distribution and exhibition.

When did the Supreme Court rule on the studios?

The trial proceeded quickly once it reached the Supreme Court in February 1948. On May 3, the court issued its ruling, which affirmed the earlier verdicts and declared the studios guilty of violating antitrust law.

What was the forerunner of the Paramount case?

The forerunner of the case was a 1928 antitrust lawsuit brought by the Federal Trade Commission against the Famous Players-Lasky Corporation (the forerunner to Paramount) and nine other major film studios.

What is the purpose of antitrust laws?

The US antitrust law is a collection of federal and state government laws that regulates the conduct and organization of business corporations to promote fair competition for the benefit of consumers.

Who was the judge that decided Microsoft had a monopoly on PC operating systems?

Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson of the Department of Justice issued his findings in the month of November, 1999. In his legal opinion, Microsoft had a monopoly on PC Operating Systems and had tried to ensure that it retained it through various tactics.

What happened to Kodak colored film?

They would charge other companies a fee to process colored film as well as a fee to deliver it back to them. The result was a deal that allowed other companies to license colored film from the company . These decrees remained in effect until 1994 when they were terminated by a court due to a shift in economic conditions in the US.

What was the result of the consent decree that Kodak would only sell its own film?

This obviously prompted antitrust lawsuits from several parties, private and federal. However, perhaps the most significant of these cases was brought forth by the US government in 1921. The result was a consent decree that basically said that Kodak would only sell its own film and not retain a monopoly on all film produced for either photography and film.

Why did the United States file a lawsuit against Standard Oil?

The United States’ government filed a case against Standard Oil due to alleged antitrust violations under the Sherman Act. The Supreme Court application of the Sherman Act in this case set a precedent for most other antitrust cases in the future. In fact, it is argued that this case helped contribute to the creation of the Clayton Anti-Trust Act. Legal experts believe that the Clayton Act is a much more comprehensive and improved version of the Sherman Act.

Is AT&T a natural monopoly?

The case has raised serious concerns about the viability of antitrust enforcement. For many years, AT&T was considered a natural monopoly, and when the government suddenly took action, it seemed like a shift in the government’s understanding of what a monopoly was. This natural monopoly defense has been used several times for other companies in similar antitrust cases. The Aluminum Company of America, for example, became the only producer in the United States, with control of many production plants. It took steps to secure this status such as obtaining exclusive rights to certain mines and acquiring land rights to build and operate hydroelectric facilities.