Concurrence/Dissent: In the dissenting opinion of chief Rehnquist Quest he states that death is not a suitable punishment for a mentally retarded person, and in fact it is a cruel and unusual …
View Analysis of Atkins Cases from PSYC 3020 at Louisiana State University. An Analysis of Some Atkins Cases Psychology 3020 Psychological Tests and Measurements Atkins v Virginia …
View Case study.docx from CRJ 3000 at Austin Peay State University. Atkins v. Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) FACTS OF THE CASE The defendant, Daryl Atkins, was convicted in Virginia of …
Daryl Atkins has an IQ of 59 and was sentenced to death for robbing and murdering a man at gun point. Atkins appealed his death sentence to the United States Supreme Court, claiming it violated the Eighth Amendment. The Supreme Court held that sentencing a mentally retarded individual to death violates the Eighth Amendment because ...
Daryl Atkins and William Jones captured and robbed Eric Nesbitt. After driving Nesbitt to an ATM and demanding him to withdraw additional cash at gun point, the two shot and killed their victim. Subsequent to their arrest, Atkins and Jones were charged with capital murder, armed robbery and abduction.
The Court held that the Eighth Amendment expressly states, “ [e]xcessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishment inflicted.”. The Court then looks to its decision in Penry v.
She is incredibly thankful to Maureen Sweeney for the opportunity to co-author this article.
The sentence was imposed by the State of Florida. Robinson v. California, U. Petitioner is Terrance Jamar Graham. He was born on January 6, Graham's parents were addicted to crack cocaine, and their drug use persisted in his early years. Graham was diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in elementary school.