Students should discuss how countries compete in economic ways and how world trade can strongly affect the economies of specific countries—that a country can become strong or weak through economic dealings and that one country can essentially "conquer" another without military action through trade and other economic policies.
Memorize flashcards and build a practice test to quiz yourself before your exam. Start studying the Bush v. Gore flashcards containing study terms like Bush v. Gore, 1. State the issue before the Supreme Court in this case? (Constitutional issue), 2. What facts of the case were presented to the Court? (Who, what, where, when) and more.
Mar 17, 2017 · Bush v. Gore. Following is the case brief for Bush v. Gore, Supreme Court of the United States, (2000) Case Summary of Bush v. Gore: After Bush was declared victorious by a few hundred votes, reports surfaced of widespread ballot issues questioning the overall results. Gore sued Florida requesting a manual recount using the “reasonable ...
a. was a trade agreement between Japan and the United States. b. addressed the issue of global warming and was rejected by President Bush. c. was a declaration of war guilt by the Japanese. d. addressed the issue of global warming and was supported by President Bush.
The next day, Gore sued the secretary, alleging that the certified results were illegitimate because the recount process was not yet complete.
The recount resulted in a dramatic tightening of the race, leaving Bush with a bare 327-vote lead out of almost 6 million ballots cast. With the race so close, Florida law allowed Gore the option of "manual vote recounts" in the counties of his choosing.
Gore (2000), a divided Supreme Court ruled that the state of Florida's court-ordered manual recount of vote ballots in the 2000 presidential election was unconstitutional. The case proved to be the climax of the contentious presidential race between Vice President Al Gore and Texas Governor George W. Bush.
In a 5-4 decision, they ruled that Florida Supreme Court's recount order was unconstitutional because it granted more protection to some ballots than others, which was violating the Fourteenth Amendment. So George W. Bush became the de facto winner because they were not able to recount the votes within the time limit.
The Court argued that voting for a president constituted a "fundamental right" strictly guarded by the Equal Protection Clause, and that the Florida Supreme Court's order violated this right because it was "arbitrary.".
Thus, with no time left to recount votes consistent with the Court's ruling, George W. Bush became the de facto winner.
In the concluding lines of his dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens proclaimed that "one thing ... is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year's Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear.
Bush v. Gore is famous for its impact on one of the closest elections in U.S. history , this case stressed the importance of having a set uniform procedure of hand-counting ballots in the event of a recount.
history. After Gore won the popular vote, the election’s outcome was contingent upon Florida and its twenty-five electoral votes. Once the deadline for counting the votes had passed, no clear winner of Florida’s electorate vote was announced. Gore then requested a manual recount under Florida’s statute. The state statute provided for “contest’ of election results when a receipt of a number of illegal votes or rejection of a number of legal votes sufficient to change or place in doubt the result of the election.” The trial court found for Bush ruling that Gore failed to prove his burden with “reasonable probability.”
The second issue is whether the Florida Supreme Court’s construction of the state statutory provisions governing contests impermissibly changes state law in violation of the Constitution. The actions of the state Supreme Court did not substantially change the legislature’s electoral scheme.
Gore, case in which, on December 12, 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed a Florida Supreme Court request for a selective manual recount of that state’s U.S. presidential election ballots. The 5–4 decision effectively awarded Florida’s 25 votes in the electoral college —and thus the election itself—to Republican candidate ...
On December 11, the two sides presented their cases, Bush’s team asserting that the Florida Supreme Court had exceeded its authority by authorizing the recount of undervotes and Gore’s team stating that the case, having already been decided at the state level, was not a matter for consideration at the federal level.
Gore was a case heard before the U.S. Supreme Court in which that court reversed a Florida Supreme Court request for a selective manual recount of ballots cast in the U.S. presidential election of 2000. The ruling effectively awarded Florida’s 25 votes in the electoral college—and thus the election itself—to Republican candidate George W. Bush.
By November 10, the machine recount was complete, and Bush’s lead stood at 327 votes out of six million cast. As court challenges were issued over the legality of hand recounts in select counties, news stories were filled with the arcane vocabulary of the election judge.
On December 8, in a 4–3 decision, the Florida Supreme Court ruled that manual recounts should continue in all counties where a statistically significant number of undervotes were observed for the office of president. Get a Britannica Premium subscription and gain access to exclusive content. Subscribe Now.
On December 12, 2000, in a 7–2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the Florida Supreme Court’s decision that manual recounts of ballots should continue in some counties, holding that the various methods and standards of the recount process violated the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution. The court ruled 5–4 on the remedy of the ...
Sample ballot from Palm Beach county, Florida, for the 2000 U.S. presidential election. A tug-of-war ensued between Harris, who initially sought to certify the state’s election results on November 14, and the Florida Supreme Court, which ruled that hand recounts of questionable ballots should proceed in four counties and ...