May 19, 2008 · Within ten years Pompey (106-48), a ruthless and arrogant young veteran of Sulla’s campaigns, rose to power. Having won victories first in Spain and then at home, where he worked with the millionaire Marcus Licinius Crassus (c. 112-53) to suppress a slave rebellion led by the gladiator Spartacus (73-71), in 70 B.C. he became
Sulla captured Jugurtha, won the major battles during the Social War (90–88 BC), defeated Mithridates (88 -84 BC) and defeated the Marian forces in the civil war (83 BC). He was elected Consul and later Dictator (82–79 BC). Caesar conquered Gaul and won the civil war versus the Pompeian forces (49 BC - 45 BC).
Mar 15, 2022 · Caesar's interest in a marriage alliance with Pompey was practical, too. The powerful general who controlled his own private army once credibly boasted, "I have only to stomp my feet and legions will spring up," via "Decline and Fall of Pompey the Great."The marriage between 17-year old Julia and 47-year-old Pompey in 59 B.C. avoided that outcome, as …
What did the Roman generals Sulla (c. 138-78 B.C.E.), Pompey (106-48 B.C.E.), and Julius Caesar (100-44 B.C.E.) have in common? A willingness to embroil Rome in civil wars to secure their own personal wealth and power. How did the general and …
In fact, perfugae testimony was not normally considered important unless the deserter was of high rank. The struggle for political hegemony in the Roman Empire between Caesar and Pompey began when the Roman Senate, under the influence of Pompey, refused to accept Caesar’s offers of compromise.
Upon his arrival in Spain, Caesar marched toward the camp of Afranius, the Pompeian commander. There he demonstrated his capacity for deception. In setting up camp, he had his men dig trenches rather than build ramparts as was common.
Pompey then believed he had won the war. According to Dio, he indeed would have had he adopted a more active policy. After the victory at Dyrrachium, Pompey took the title imperator, but was unwilling to boast over “the downfall of citizens.
Rubicon River divided Gaul provinces from Italy. This act triggered civil war in Roman Republic since the appearance of the proconsul with the army in Italy was illegal. Caesar motivated his actions with the revenge for the violation of Tribune rights, by trying to shift the responsibility for the war on his enemies.
Caesar remained briefly in Rome. Caesar wanted with an unexpected attack on Pompey’s troops in Spain to set back their eventual offensive. In the beginning Caesar had no success, but when reinforcements from Gaul arrived, he managed to defeat Pompey’s troops at Ilerda 49 BC.
Caesar’s crossing over the Rubicon River. In January 10, 49 BC Caesar crossed the Rubicon River with one legion. According to Suetonius (Roman historian who wrote The Life of the Caesars ), Caesar uttered the phrase alea iacta est (“the die has been cast”). Rubicon River divided Gaul provinces from Italy.
Battle of Pharsalus and its significance. The movement of Caesar’s army after the Battle of Ilerda. In the 49 BC, Pompey had an advantage because he had a huge number of well-armed and food supplied troops as well as strong fleet. Caesar’s army on the other hand was very well disciplined.
Titus Annius Milo was exiled from the Rome. Caesar was neither sure nor safe, whether he should come to Rome and run for consul. The biggest speeches against Caesar were held by the Marcus Porcius Cato the Younger. The first triumvirate had fallen apart long time ago.
Augustus, the first Roman emperor. The Roman emperors were the rulers of the Roman Empire dating from the granting of the title of Augustus to Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus by the Roman Senate in 27 BC, after major roles played by the populist dictator and military leader Julius Caesar. Augustus maintained a facade of Republican rule, ...
The Laskarid dynasty of the Empire of Nicaea is considered the legitimate continuation of the Roman Empire because they had the support of the (Orthodox) Patriarch of Constantinople and managed to re-take Constantinople.
In the late 3rd century, after the Crisis of the Third Century, Diocletian formalised and embellished the recent manner of imperial rule, establishing the so-called Dominate period of the Roman Empire.