and if you are curious what's difference between varchar (255) and varchar (256) then varchar (256) can hold upto 256 ascii characters instead of 255.
Full Answer
Historically, 255 characters has often been the maximum length of a VARCHAR in some DBMSes, and it sometimes still winds up being the effective maximum if you want to use UTF-8 and have the column indexed (because of index length limitations).
The defined length (255) also represents where input would throw an error if it is longer - so inserting "123456" into a varchar (5) column would result in a "Data too long" error. Sorry, something went wrong. So the “var” stands for variable. Exactly because it takes up a variable amount of space based on the string length.
And "Old habits die hard" is probably the truest answer of all. – Andrew M Jun 20 '12 at 17:05 Add a comment | 22 I'm going to answer the literal question: no, there isn't a good reason you see VARCHAR(255) used so often (there are indeed reasons, as discussed in the other answers, just not good ones).
many databases use varchar fields of the given size in the tables so that they don't have to move rows around when that field is changed for a row. – SingleNegationElimination
Should I use varchar(255) or varchar(256) when designing tables? I've heard one byte is used for the length of column, or to store metadata. Does it matter anymore at this point? I saw some posts on the internet, however they apply to Oracle and MySQL.
I rant against 255 occasionally. Sure, there used to be some reasons for '255', but many are no longer valid, and even counter-productive.. In MySQL, there are reasons to stop at 191, 255, 767, 3071, 64K, and probably other values. Some depend on Engine, some on CHARACTER SET, etc.. A VARCHAR is stored as a 1- or 2-byte length plus enough bytes for the current text in whatever charset you have ...
Example. Suggested max len. First, I will mention some common strings that are always hex, or otherwise limited to ASCII. For these, you should specify CHARACTER SET ascii (latin1 is ok) so that it will not waste space:. UUID CHAR(36) CHARACTER SET ascii -- or pack into BINARY(16) country_code CHAR(2) CHARACTER SET ascii ip_address CHAR(39) CHARACTER SET ascii -- or pack into BINARY(16) phone ...
1. CHAR Datatype: It is a datatype in SQL which is used to store character string of fixed length specified. If the length of string is less than set or fixed length then it is padded with extra blank spaces so that its length became equal to the set length.
In this article. Applies to: SQL Server (all supported versions) Azure SQL Database Azure SQL Managed Instance Azure Synapse Analytics Analytics Platform System (PDW) Character data types that are either fixed-size, char, or variable-size, varchar.Starting with SQL Server 2019 (15.x), when a UTF-8 enabled collation is used, these data types store the full range of Unicode character data and ...
Historically, 255 characters has often been the maximum length of a VARCHAR in some DBMSes, and it sometimes still winds up being the effective maximum if you want to use UTF-8 and have the column indexed (because of index length limitations).
When used this way, VarChar only uses the number of bytes + 1 to store your text, so you might as well set it to 255, unless you want a hard limit (like 50) on the number of characters in the field.
I realize, of course, that a tighter limit would be more ideal, if you somehow know the maximum length of the string. But if you are using VARCHAR (255) that probably indicates that you don't know the max length, only that it is a "shortish" string.
255 is used because it's the largest number of characters that can be counted with an 8-bit number. It maximizes the use of the 8-bit count, without frivolously requiring another whole byte to count the characters above 255.
An unsigned 1 byte number can contain the range [0-255] inclusive. So when you see 255, it is mostly because programmers think in base 10 (get the joke?) :)
No. you don't save two bytes by declaring 253. The implementation of the varchar is most likely a length counter and a variable length, nonterminated array. This means that if you store "hello" in a varchar (255) you will occupy 6 bytes: one byte for the length (the number 5) and 5 bytes for the five letters. Share.
Historically, 255 characters has often been the maximum length of a VARCHAR in some DBMSes, and it sometimes still winds up being the effective maximum if you want to use UTF-8 and have the column indexed (because of index length limitations).
When used this way, VarChar only uses the number of bytes + 1 to store your text, so you might as well set it to 255, unless you want a hard limit (like 50) on the number of characters in the field.
I realize, of course, that a tighter limit would be more ideal, if you somehow know the maximum length of the string. But if you are using VARCHAR (255) that probably indicates that you don't know the max length, only that it is a "shortish" string.
255 is used because it's the largest number of characters that can be counted with an 8-bit number. It maximizes the use of the 8-bit count, without frivolously requiring another whole byte to count the characters above 255.
An unsigned 1 byte number can contain the range [0-255] inclusive. So when you see 255, it is mostly because programmers think in base 10 (get the joke?) :)
No. you don't save two bytes by declaring 253. The implementation of the varchar is most likely a length counter and a variable length, nonterminated array. This means that if you store "hello" in a varchar (255) you will occupy 6 bytes: one byte for the length (the number 5) and 5 bytes for the five letters. Share.