there's nothing a politician can really do to reverse the course from what i've seen

Do politicians have a positive or negative face?

Positive face is, of course, pretty ignoble, and politicians we perceive to be able to say what they really feel, regardless of the flak they get, are admired disproportionately to how honest or talented or effective they demonstrably are. Negative face, however, is much more of a conundrum.

Do social class backgrounds of politicians matter?

It would be convenient, for instance, if we could sidestep this question entirely by saying that the social class backgrounds of politicians don’t really matter, that politicians always do their best to work for the common good regardless of where they come from (This was Alexander Hamilton’s argument in the Federalist #35).

Why don’t politicians give direct answers to interviewers?

First, Bull details why politicians evade giving direct answers to interviewers: “It’s primarily to do with face; positive face is concerned with making sure they themselves don’t look bad, and negative face is about keeping one’s freedom of action and not committing to anything.”

Are politicians really seasoned evaders?

Clearly, politicians are seasoned evaders, and an amateur couldn’t compete. But what struck me is that these conversations are nothing like a civilian evasion, nothing at all like pretending to like a gift or a haircut.

What is the main idea of President Reagan's speech a time for choosing?

In the speech, he revealed his ideological motivation: "The Founding Fathers knew a government can't control the economy without controlling people. And they knew when a government sets out to do that, it must use force and coercion to achieve its purpose.

Who wrote Ronald Reagan's speeches?

In 1981, Khachigian was named chief speechwriter and special consultant to the President. Within the first 100 days, Khachigian wrote Reagan's inaugural address, his three main economic speeches, and the welcome home to the Iranian hostages.

Why was his presidency referred to as the Reagan Revolution?

The Reagan Era or Age of Reagan is a periodization of recent American history used by historians and political observers to emphasize that the conservative "Reagan Revolution" led by President Ronald Reagan in domestic and foreign policy had a lasting impact.

What did Reagan do?

Reagan enacted cuts in domestic discretionary spending, cut taxes, and increased military spending, which contributed to a near tripling of the federal debt. Foreign affairs dominated his second term, including the bombing of Libya, the Iran–Iraq War, the Iran–Contra affair, and the ongoing Cold War.

Was Ronald Reagan a good communicator?

Reagan said that it was his "empathy" with the American people that made him an effective communicator and leader. Reagan was able to connect to people through storytelling. While this simple form of communicating led detractors such as Clark Clifford to label Reagan as "an amiable dunce", Michael K.

Who are the best presidents?

Abraham Lincoln, Franklin D. Roosevelt, and George Washington are most often listed as the three highest-rated presidents among historians.

Did Reaganomics help the economy?

Real GDP grew over one-third during Reagan's presidency, an over $2 trillion increase. The compound annual growth rate of GDP was 3.6% during Reagan's eight years, compared to 2.7% during the preceding eight years.

Was Reagan a Republican?

Reagan, a Republican from California, took office following a landslide victory over Democratic incumbent President Jimmy Carter in the 1980 presidential election. Four years later, in the 1984 election, he defeated Democrat former vice president Walter Mondale to win re-election in a larger landslide.

Did the election of Reagan indicate a change in political party alignment?

Having been elected twice to the presidency, Reagan reshaped the Republican Party, led the modern conservative movement, and altered the political dynamic of the United States.

Why did Reaganomics not work?

Cuts worked during Reagan's presidency because the highest tax rate was 70%. They have a much weaker effect when tax rates are below 50%. Reaganomics would not work today because tax rates are already low compared to historical levels of 70%.

Who is the 42th president of America?

William Jefferson Clinton (né Blythe III; born August 19, 1946) is an American politician who served as the 42nd president of the United States from 1993 to 2001....Bill ClintonOfficial portrait, 199342nd President of the United StatesIn office January 20, 1993 – January 20, 2001Vice PresidentAl Gore39 more rows

Who was the youngest president?

The youngest person to assume the presidency was Theodore Roosevelt, who, at the age of 42, succeeded to the office after the assassination of William McKinley. The youngest to become president by election was John F. Kennedy, who was inaugurated at age 43.

What does Trader Joe's wises up tell the leftists?

Trader Joe's wises up, reverses course, tells the leftist political-correctness mob 'no'

What does "taking something from another culture" mean?

A: I mean, my understanding of the term is that it means, when you're taking something from another culture, claiming it as your own without recognizing where it comes from, and that couldn't be further from what I'm doing.

Did the change.org petition have an effect?

Yes, it did have an effect, and now the lefties are gathering more signatures to complain further. See how Change.org arranged the two statements and framed the issue on its site. They thought they had a cave-in from Big Corporate, and now are upset that they don't.

Is enjoying another culture racist?

It seems the good guys are winning now. Enjoying another culture is not racism , it's white Karenism, done by wokester teens with absolutely nothing intelligent to say. Glad Trader Joe's woke up and smelled the coffee.

Why don't qualified working class people appear on the ballot?

Qualified working-class Americans almost never appear on your ballot in part because powerful people are less likely to encourage or support them. Protesters attend the Los Angeles rally on the anniversary of the Women’s March. Women now make up almost 20% of Congress. Photograph: Mark Ralston/AFP/Getty Images.

How does the absence of working class affect public policy?

These differences, coupled with the virtual absence of working-class people in our political institutions, ultimately have enormous consequences for public policy. States with fewer legislators from the working class spend billions less on social welfare each year, offer less generous unemployment benefits and tax corporations at lower rates. Towns with fewer working-class people on their city councils devote smaller shares of their budgets to social safety net programs; an analysis I conducted in 2013 suggested that cities nationwide would spend approximately $22.5bn more on social assistance programs each year if their councils were made up of the same mix of classes as the people they represent. Unfortunately, we can’t write off white-collar government as politically inconsequential. As the old saying goes, when the working class isn’t at the table, it’s often on the menu.

Why do candidates like Ocasio-Cortez raise eyebrows?

The root cause – and one of the reasons that candidates such as Bryce and Ocasio-Cortez raise eyebrows – is that workers almost never run, even at the state and local levels. In nationwide surveys of people campaigning for state legislatures in 2012 and 2014, candidates from working-class jobs made up just 4% of both Republican and Democratic candidates. In California – the one state that offers detailed data on the occupational backgrounds of candidates at the local level – between 1995 and 2011, workers made up just 4% of candidates for county and local office.

Why do workers rarely run for office?

First, workers seldom run for public office in the US because of the fundamental personal burdens associated with campaigning – doing so always takes a great deal of time and energy, and working-class Americans are far less likely to have the time and energy to spare.

Why don't workers hold office?

The idea that workers don’t hold office because they lack the necessary skills simply doesn’t add up. If just 1% of working-class Americans had what it takes to govern, that would be more than enough potential politicians to staff every office in the United States.

Is it good to make public office more accessible?

From a reform standpoint, that is actually good news. Making public office more accessible to a broad cross-section of the economy won’t require significantly changing our laws or electoral institutions. People who work in and around government just need to devote more attention and resources to qualified working-class candidates.

Do reformers run?

Nonetheless, they seldom run. But researchers and reformers are starting to understand why – and to identify interventions that might give working-class Americans more of a seat at the table in government.

Why do politicians evade giving direct answers to interviewers?

First, Bull details why politicians evade giving direct answers to interviewers: “It’s primarily to do with face; positive face is concerned with making sure they themselves don’t look bad, and negative face is about keeping one’s freedom of action and not committing to anything.” Positive face is, of course, pretty ignoble, and politicians we perceive to be able to say what they really feel, regardless of the flak they get, are admired disproportionately to how honest or talented or effective they demonstrably are.

Who is May compared to?

May is often compared to Margaret Thatcher – they have that ineffable, sphinxish quality so rare in public life (let’s call it, for brevity, being female), but their evasive techniques couldn’t be more different. Thatcher frequently attacked the interviewer, which might have been charmless, but had the desired effect: few stayed on point after a skirmish. (“Theresa May isn’t like that at all. She is very polite.”) Neil Kinnock was known for negative evasion – he would tell the interviewer what he wasn’t going to do, which wasn’t effective at all, encouraging a predictable, punchier response: well, what are you going to do, then?

Why do people of color pull the reverse racism card?

The “reverse racism” card is often pulled by white people when people of color call out racism and discrimination, or create spaces for themselves ( think BET) that white people aren’t a part of. The impulse behind the reverse racism argument seems to be a desire to prove that people of color don’t have it that bad, ...

Is Black History Month reverse racist?

How racist!! Things like Black History Month, BET, and Black Girls Rock are not “reverse racist” against white people, they’re not examples of a double standard in which White History Month, The White Entertainment Channel, and White Girls Rock would be considered offensive.

Is affirmative action a reverse racism?

The affirmative action debate has been raging for decades, with many people arguing that it’s a prime example of reverse racism. They believe deserving white students are discriminated against while academically unqualified students are given highly coveted college or company positions ― just because they happen to tick the “ethnic minority” box. This argument ignores the fact that affirmative action did not come out of nowhere ― there was a need for a system that would address the decades of underrepresentation of people of color both academically and in the job world.

Is reverse racism wrong?

There have been so many explainers on why the concept of reverse racism is inherently wrong, so many breakdowns, but perhaps another way to tackle this discussion is to address some of the main topics and issues that get called out as reverse racism. Here are four common arguments that have no merit:

What happens if a white person uses a racist slur?

If a white person used as racist slur such as “niggar,” he or she would be crucified by media and peers. In fact, merely mentioning the word in a public forum will usually drive days of national stories condemning the action. Martha Stewart and Paula Deen both had their careers derailed for making racist remarks many years prior. Any incidents of discrimination against minorities usually leads to lawsuits, boycotts, and regular media attacks. But what about the opposite? Virtually every rapper has used racist slurs of some kind in their songs. Any minority celebrity could use racist slurs through any media interview, and it likely wouldn’t even be mentioned a single time by the national media. Think about hate crimes based solely on race. In which case do you think there is more likelihood of a hate crime, when a black person walks alone through an all-white suburban neighborhood, or a white person walks alone through an inner city all-black neighborhood? Another example – what do you think would be the reaction if there were a whites-only student union or fraternity, scholarship fund, or hiring quotas? However, it’s perfectly acceptable to have non-white race requirements for any of these items.

How do government benefits help people?

Everyone needs a helping hand in life when they go through difficult periods such as a sudden loss of job. Food stamps, unemployment insurance, the earned income credit, Medicare, and other government benefits can certainly help launch people out of poverty. However, the combinations of benefits plus the lack of time limitation has created an incentive to work less or not at all. Why take a low-paying job when you have a safety net that pays almost as much as the job? If you go without work for too long, you tend to become lethargic and unmotivated. It also becomes harder to get hired when you have a long employment absence. Consequently, too many individuals fall into a pattern of living off the system. It limits a person’s potential. When a person is forced to get a job to survive, they develop job skills and experience. If it’s an unskilled minimum wage job, it may motivate them to pursue a college or technical degree. In short, long-term government benefits only work to prevent people from being all they could be.

Should education be a priority?

There is nothing more important to the future of a nation than education, so it stands to reason that it should be a high priority in setting budgets. However, with today’s technology, costs should be going down significantly. You can get a free or nearly free course on almost any subject through KhanAcademy.org, Udemy.com, Youtube, GCFLearnFree.com, or an endless list of other internet resources. As for teachers, they can download complete lesson plans, tests, video lectures, and so on. Books can be downloaded to computers and mobile devices, so we shouldn’t have to spend as much on large printed textbooks. Computers keep coming down in price. Many tech companies like Google are providing free devices or software to students. Add it all up and education cost per student should be plummeting. Of course, the mere suggestion that education budgets should be cut would quickly bring out a lynch mob.

Is it a right to not engage in sex transactions?

This is supposed to be a free country. If you oppose the activity for moral or religious grounds, it is absolutely your right to not engage in sex transactions. There are harmful effects to those involved, but that is their choice.