of course you don't need all those attachments but why woulnd you southpark bike
by Luz Lemke
Published 2 years ago
Updated 1 year ago
6 min read
Send A Second Copy Without Attachments
This would be more a solution for informational messages for which you don't expect a reply or for the people who were in BCC since the To recipient(s) wouldn't have seen them anyway and a Reply All would not have addressed any of the BCC recipients either. After sending your original message with attachments, go into your Sent Items folder and For...
A more ideal solution to the above could be to place the attachments on a (secure) location the main recipient(s) has (have) also access to. This can be a network share, a corporate website solution (such as SharePoint) or an FTP-server or one of the many file sharing web sites which are available today such as OneDrive and DropBox. You'd then only provide the links to these docum…
For most scenarios, I'm in this camp myself. When people want/need a copy, they get exactly that: A full blown copy of the original in all its glory. In that case, I don’t care how many attachments it has as long as the recipients are allowed to receive them. If the attachments are “for To eyes only”, I send a second message. If the CC or BCC recipients feel they only need to keep the text a…