A brief overview of the case: Suppose you find yourself in a situation in which killing an innocent person is the only way to prevent many innocent people from dying. What’s the right thing to do? This question arose in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens (1884), a famous English law case involving four men stranded in a lifeboat without food or water.
Dec 10, 2020 · View JUSTICE - HARVARD.docx from ERX JUSTICE at Harvard University. JUSTICE Michael Sandel 1 Table of Contents Lecture 1: Doing the Right Thing o Moral Reasoning Philosophy of Utilitarianism Lecture
Course description. Taught by lauded Harvard professor Michael Sandel, Justice explores critical analysis of classical and contemporary theories of justice, including discussion of present-day applications. Topics include affirmative action, income distribution, same-sex marriage, the role of markets, debates about rights (human rights and ...
Feb 08, 2016 · Michael Sandel . Head Teaching Fellow Sergio Imparato ... While Justice is a course that encourages active discussion amongst students, ... Course schedule . Lecture 1: Doing the Right Thing (January 25) Lecture video;
Sandel believes that philosophy is not "distant and abstract" but, instead, a function of the "hard ethical" choices that life throws up. What's more, he argues that it's vital for the democratic health of society to be able to identify the big questions that lie behind everyday conflicts and presumptions.Apr 7, 2012
Sandel introduces the principles of utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham with a famous nineteenth century law case involving a shipwrecked crew of four. After nineteen days lost at sea, the captain decides to kill the cabin boy, the weakest amongst them, so they can feed on his blood and body to survive.
What two objections to this argument does Sandel mention? Sandel objects that the benefits to those three men don't really outweigh the cost that the murder puts on society. He also says, essentially, that it is just downright morally wrong, without the consideration of the cost/benefit ratio.
“In his new book, Michael Sandel —the closest the world of political philosophy comes to a celebrity — argues that we now live in a society where 'almost everything can be bought and sold.Aug 16, 2016
In this 12-part series, Sandel challenges us with difficult moral dilemmas and asks our opinion about the right thing to do. He then asks us to examine our answers in the light of new scenarios. The result is often surprising, revealing that important moral questions are never black and white.
Three approaches to justice—the welfare of the community at large, the rights of the individual, the value of good citizenship—are the heart of Sandel's matter.
As Sandel explains, utilitarianism is the theory that consequences are what matter, and so the just action is that which promotes the best outcome for the greatest number of people. Sandel then discusses some major objections to utilitarian thought.
The attempt to detach arguments about justice and rights from arguments about the good life is mistaken for two reasons: first, it's not always possible to decide questions of justice and rights without resolving substantive moral questions, and this is true whether we're arguing about surrogacy or about how to ...Jun 16, 2009
For the moral individualist, to be free is to be subject only to obligations I voluntarily incur; whatever I owe others, I owe by virtue of some act of consent—a choice or a promise or an agreement I have made, be it tacit or explicit.Apr 30, 2011
The thesis of Sandel's book is that when market reasoning goes beyond the domain of material goods, it must “traffic in morality.” In other words, in order to decide what money should and should not be able to buy, we have to decide what values should govern various aspects of social and civic life.Sep 24, 2012
In What Money Can't Buy, Sandel examines one of the biggest ethical questions of our time and provokes a debate that's been missing in our market-driven age: What is the proper role of markets in a democratic society, and how can we protect the moral and civic goods that markets do not honour and money cannot buy?Jun 15, 2012
Sandel says that in the debate about what money can and cannot buy, two objections recur. The first is about fairness – about the inequality that market choices may reflect – and the other is about corruption – the way in which attitudes and norms are dissolved by market logic.Jun 8, 2012
Sandel presents some contemporary cases in which cost-benefit analysis was used to put a dollar value on human life. The cases give rise to several objections to the utilitarian logic of seeking “the greatest good for the greatest number.”.
It certainly has been the most widely discussed. Of all the commentary it has spawned, none has been more important than the critique offered by Michael Sandel in a book published in 1982 called Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, which succeeded in calling into question some of Rawls’s more fundamental premises.”.
Sandel introduces the principles of utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham with a famous nineteenth century law case involving a shipwrecked crew of four. After nineteen days lost at sea, the captain decides to kill the cabin boy, the weakest amongst them, so they can feed on his blood and body to survive.
Aristotle disagrees with Rawls and Kant. He believes that justice is about giving people their due, what they deserve. The best flutes, for example, should go to the best flute players. And the highest political offices should go to those with the best judgment and the greatest civic virtue.
Lecture 13 – A Lesson in Lying#N#Immanuel Kant believed that telling a lie, even a white lie, is a violation of one’s own dignity. Sandel asks students to test Kant’s theory with this hypothetical case: if a friend were hiding inside your home, and a murderer came to your door and asked you where he was, would it be wrong to lie to him? This leads to a video clip of one of the most famous, recent examples of dodging the truth: President Clinton talking about his relationship with Monica Lewinsky.
This course explores critical analysis of classical and contemporary theories of justice, including discussion of present-day applications. Topics include affirmative action, income distribution, same-sex marriage, the role of markets, debates about rights (human rights and property rights), arguments for and against equality, and dilemmas of loyalty in public and private life. The course invites learners to subject their own views on these controversies to critical examination. The principal readings for the course are texts by Aristotle, John Locke, Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, and John Rawls. Other assigned readings include writings by contemporary philosophers, court cases, and articles about political controversies that raise philosophical questions. The recorded lectures are from the HarvardX course Justice.
a family emergency or major illness). A heavy workload is not sufficient. Late assignments will be penalized 0.5 points per day.