irregular and high handed combinations which sometimes interrupt the ordinary course of justice

What is the main idea of Federalist 78?

Federalist No. 78 discusses the power of judicial review. It argues that the federal courts have the job of determining whether acts of Congress are constitutional and what must be done if the government is faced with the things that are done on the contrary of the Constitution.

What is the main idea of Federalist 70?

In this Federalist Paper, Alexander Hamilton argues for a strong executive leader, as provided for by the Constitution, as opposed to the weak executive under the Articles of Confederation. He asserts, “energy in the executive is the leading character in the definition of good government.

What was the Federalist 51 about?

Federalist No. 51 addresses means by which appropriate checks and balances can be created in government and also advocates a separation of powers within the national government. The idea of checks and balances is a crucial part of the modern U.S. system of government.

What are Hamilton's four ingredients for an energetic executive?

The ingredients which constitute energy in the Executive are, first, unity; secondly, duration; thirdly, an adequate provision for its support; fourthly, competent powers.

What are the main points of Federalist 70 quizlet?

What benefits does a strong presidency provide to a representative democracy? A strong presidency provided unity, stability, and protection, a strong presidency not only protects the people from other countries, but also from themselves.

What is the main idea of Federalist 69?

In Federalist No. 69, Alexander Hamilton sought to explain the nature of the executive branch in order to address fears that the President would function as an elected monarch, the primary concern of Anti-Federalists.

What are the two constitutional principles that Madison is referring to in the above passage from The Federalist Papers?

At the Constitutional Convention, Madison advocated for constitutional principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, bicameralism, and federalism, which would limit government and protect individual liberties.

What did federalist 10 say?

10 shows an explicit rejection by the Founding Fathers of the principles of direct democracy and factionalism, and argue that Madison suggests that a representative republic is more effective against partisanship and factionalism.

Who wrote fed 78?

Alexander Hamilton78 by Alexander Hamilton. To the People of the State of New York: WE PROCEED now to an examination of the judiciary department of the proposed government.

What is Alexander Hamilton's main argument about the power of the executive and the executive branch in Federalist No 70?

Hamilton argues that unity in the executive branch is a main ingredient for both energy and safety. Energy arises from the proceedings of a single person, characterized by, "decision, activity, secrecy, and dispatch," while safety arises from the unitary executive's unconcealed accountability to the people.

What does it mean for a executive to be energetic?

Four ingredients of an energetic executive are unity, competent powers, adequate provision for its support, and duration. 4.) According to Hamiliton, energy is the most necessary quality for a president. Energy is required for a president to be responsible, decisive, and efficient in order to protect the people.

Which of the following characteristics make up an energetic executive?

Four ingredients of an energetic executive branch are unity, competent powers, adequate provision for its support, and duration.

What benefits does a strong presidency provide to a representative democracy Federalist 70?

A strong presidency is beneficial to representative democracy because it provides defense against foreign attacks, efficient administration of laws, and the security of liberty. ... A weak executive creates a bad government because it weakens authority and leads to bad execution of government as a whole.More items...•

Who wrote Federalist 70?

Table of ContentsNo.TitleAuthor69.The Real Character of the ExecutiveHamilton70.The Executive Department Further ConsideredHamilton71.The Duration in Office of the ExecutiveHamilton72.The Same Subject Continued, and Re-Eligibility of the Executive ConsideredHamilton81 more rows•Apr 14, 2022

When was fed 70 written?

70, [15 March 1788]

How do human weaknesses complicate decision-making according to Hamilton Federalist 70?

How do human weaknesses complicate decision-making, according to Hamilton? They lessen the respectability, weaken the authority, and distract the plans and operations of those whom they divide. They lessen the respectability, weaken the authority, and distract the plans and operations of those whom they divide.

What was the Supreme Court ruling in 1895?

In 1895, the Supreme Court heard a case about the Income Tax Act of 1894 . The Court held that the act was unconstitutional and the federal government did not have the power to tax personal income.

Which act governs the case to which they both apply?

If, then, the courts are to regard the constitution, and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply."

Which agency may shape policy in different directions than the federal bureaucracy intended?

State and local agencies may shape policy in different directions than the federal bureaucracy intended, which forces the federal bureaucracy to spend resources enforcing compliance with the original policy.

Which case struck down the Violence Against Women Act?

In United States v. Morrison (2000), the Supreme Court struck down the part of the Violence Against Women Act that made gender-motivated violence a federal crime, as it was not related to the commerce clause.

What does Senator Cruz believe about the Supreme Court?

Senator Cruz believes that the Supreme Court made several controversial decisions that undermine states' rights under the Constitution.

Which two authors omitted the phrase "circumstances of the"?

8.  “circumstances of the” omitted in McLean and Hopkins.

Why does the British constitution dictate that the propriety of a council not only ceases to apply but turns against?

But in a republic, where every magistrate ought to be personally responsible for his behaviour in office , the reason which in the British constitution dictates the propriety of a council not only ceases to apply, but turns against the institution. In the monarchy of Great-Britain, it furnishes a substitute for the prohibited responsibility of the chief magistrate; which serves in some degree as a hostage to the national justice for his good behaviour. In the American republic it would serve to destroy, or would greatly diminish the intended and necessary responsibility of the chief magistrate himself.

What does the experience of other nations teach us?

As far however as it teaches any thing, it teaches us not to be inamoured of plurality in the executive. We have seen that the Achæans on an experiment of two Præetors, were induced to abolish one.7The Roman history records many instances of mischiefs to the republic from the dissentions between the consuls, and between the military tribunes, who were at times substituted to the consuls. But it gives us no specimens of any peculiar advantages derived to the state, from the circumstance of the8plurality of those magistrates. That the dissentions between them were not more frequent, or more fatal, is matter of astonishment; until we advert to the singular position in which the republic was almost continually placed and to the prudent policy pointed out by the circumstances of the state, and pursued by the consuls, of making a division of the government between them. The Patricians engaged in a perpetual struggle with the Plebeians for the preservation of their antient authorities and dignities; the consuls, who were generally chosen out of the former body, were commonly united by the personal interest they had in the defence of the privileges of their order. In addition to this motive of union, after the arms of the republic had considerably expanded the bounds of its empire, it became an established custom with the consuls to divide the administration between themselves by lot; one of them remaining at Rome to govern the city and its environs; the other taking the command in the more distant provinces. This expedient must no doubt have had great influence in preventing those collisions and rivalships, which might otherwise have embroiled the peace of9the republic.

What is Federalist No. 70?

The Federalist No. 70 1. [New York, March 15, 1788] To the People of the State of New-York. THERE is an idea, which is not without its advocates, that a vigorous executive is inconsistent with the genius of republican government. The enlightened well wishers to this species of government must at least hope that the supposition is destitute ...

Why do men oppose things?

Men often oppose a thing merely because they have had no agency in planning it, or because it may have been planned by those whom they dislike. But if they have been consulted and have happened to disapprove, opposition then becomes in their estimation an indispensable duty of self love. They seem to think themselves bound in honor, and by all the motives of personal infallibility to defeat the success of what has been resolved upon, contrary to their sentiments. Men of upright, benevolent tempers have too many opportunities of remarking with horror, to what desperate lengths this disposition is sometimes carried, and how often the great interests of society are sacrificed to the vanity, to the conceit and to the obstinacy of individuals, who have credit enough to make their passions and their caprices interesting to mankind. Perhaps the question now before the public may in its consequences afford melancholy proofs of the effects of this despicable frailty, or rather detestable vice in the human character.

Why did the Patricians fight with the Plebeians?

The Patricians engaged in a perpetual struggle with the Plebeians for the preservation of their antient authorities and dignities ; the consuls, who were generally chosen out of the former body, were commonly united by the personal interest they had in the defence of the privileges of their order.

Is it unnecessary to introduce inconveniences into the constitution of the executive?

Upon the principles of a free government, inconveniencies from the source just mentioned must necessarily be submitted to in the formation of the legislature; but it is unnecessary and therefore unwise to introduce them into the constitution of the executive. It is here too that they may be most pernicious.