Course Map Template Download the Course Map Template. Fill out the general course information. Then, transfer your learning outcomes from the Exercise Worksheet and follow the steps below to complete the course map.
Full Answer
Course Map Template Download the Course Map Template. Fill out the general course information. Then, transfer your learning outcomes from the Exercise Worksheet and follow the steps below to complete the course map. Download the Course Map Tempate See Example Course Maps Take a look at the example course maps. HOW TO MAP YOUR COURSE
5.1 Choosing the right planning, monitoring and evaluation (PME) Framework. 5.2 Outcome Mapping Principles. 5.2.1 Performer focused improvement and conduct change. 5.2.2 Constant learning and adaptability. 5.2.3 Interest and responsibility. 5.2.4 Non-linearity and commitment.
· OM provides a set of tools to design and gather information on the outcomes, defined as behavioural changes, among the ‘boundary’ partners of a project. Identifying the behavioural changes that a project aims to deliver becomes synonymous with its outcomes, and part of a wider process of focusing on how change happens.
With aligning (or curriculum mapping), staff review a given course's: learning outcomes. content. learning activities and. assessment. to identify where and how graduate attributes are taught, practised, and assessed within the course. Often this exercise shows that many graduate attributes are already being developed, but not in an explicit way.
To build your course map, create a table or chart that lists each of the student learning outcomes for your course. For each of your student learning outcomes, list what assignments or activities have been designed to address that particular outcome. When completed, your course map provides an interesting analysis.
5 Different Ways to Map Learning OutcomesThe traditional process of curriculum mapping. ... The current scenario. ... 5 levels of Mapping. ... Level 1: PO-COURSE MAPPING. ... Level 2: CO - PO MAPPING. ... Level 3: ASSESSMENTS - CO MAPPING. ... Level 4 of Mapping: Syllabus - CO mapping. ... Level 5: QUESTIONS - CO MAPPING.More items...•
Helpful HintsFocus on the student--what the student will be able to do by the end of the course or program.Describe outcomes, not processes or activities.Start each outcome with an action verb.Use only one action verb per learning outcome.Avoid vague verbs such as know and understand.More items...
In simple terms, curriculum mapping is a process that enables districts to gather data on what is actually being taught and what students are actually learning. The result of this process is a curriculum map that teachers can use as a tool to stay organized and as a framework for daily lesson planning.
Program Outcomes (POs): As stated by NBA, represent the knowledge, skills and attitudes the students should have at the end of a four year engineering program in India. The Course Outcomes(COs): They are the resultant knowledge skills the student acquires at the end of a course.
Creating a link between the Course Outcomes (Cos) and program outcomes (POs), for each lesson and assessment is called CO-PO Mapping. It helps to encourage and apply Outcome Based Education in the schools and colleges for attaining a futuristic approach towards education along with improved learning outcomes.
Steps to Writing Course Learning Outcomes for Your Course. Select an action verb using Bloom's Taxonomy: ... Levels of Achievement. A level of achievement identifies how proficient students need to be in a task. ... Conditions of Performance. ... Tips and Tricks. ... More information.
What are the five learning outcomes of the early years learning framework?Children have a strong sense of identity. ... Children are connected with and contribute to their world. ... Children have a strong sense of wellbeing. ... Children are confident and involved learners. ... Children are effective communicators.
7 Learning Outcomes7 Learning Outcomes1Identify own strengths and develop areas for growth2Demonstrate that challenges have been undertaken, developing new skills in the process3Demonstrate how to initiate and plan a CAS experience4Show commitment to and perseverance in CAS experiences3 more rows
Most of the time, a curriculum map looks a lot like a spreadsheet. The rows show the weeks or months in a marking period, and the columns show information taught in that timeframe, like state standards and the resources available to address those standards.
Curriculum mapping is an important task used to show proper alignment of program goals, course objectives, instructional support materials, formative assessment activities, summative outcomes assessments, and finally the instructional plan.
Mapping (also called “charting”) outcomes allows the department to identify which courses address each of the learning outcomes. This activity is useful for communicating where within the curriculum learning outcomes are introduced, practiced, and mastered.
Mapping can reveal opportunities align aspects of course design in new or better ways, or to introduce new learning or assessment activities, and so on.
We call the process of aligning learning activities, learning outcomes and assessment with the course and program goals "curriculum mapping". When we conduct curriculum mapping at program level, we connect these 3 elements with the development of the program's stated goals or graduate attributes.
When you're using the constructive alignment approach to curriculum design, one basic activity is to choose and develop learning activities that are aligned with intended learning outcomes. That is, they are: 1 likely to lead to students achieving the specified learning outcomes for a particular teaching session, course, or program 2 practical and appropriate to use within your current context and with available resources.
Biggs's structure of the observed learning outcome (SOLO) taxonomy (1982) supports this approach. The SOLO taxonomy provides a systematic way to describe how a learner's performance grows in complexity when mastering many academic tasks.
As one important outcome of this review process, you might revise course and program outlines so that they include clear statements of the graduate attributes each course or program is to develop.
Not every course can be expected to develop skills, knowledge and graduate attributes. Like course mapping, program mapping can reveal gaps and areas of over-concentration. You will be able to see whether the program currently integrates all its specified attributes and how effectively it does so.
Although you can map individual courses, it is most useful if you consider and conduct course design and mapping as part of a program review and revision process. To begin this process, Faculties or Schools translate University-wide attributes into a set of discipline specific program attributes.
Mapping co-curricular learning as it relates to other elements of the educational environment can help to foster the coherent, integrated learning experiences needed to foster student success. While within specific student affairs units, mapping can occur of the learning addressed as well as how elements connect with CAS Standards (Table 6), points of connection can also be explored. However, while Table 6 does not include how the learning outcome is addressed, Tables 3 and 4 presented earlier can be layered under the program column for a full picture of the theory of change behind learning support (Jankowski & Marshall, 2017).
An additional layer to add to a program-level curriculum map is considering the relationship between program-level learning outcomes and general education. This map includes exploration of the general education courses that support learning outcomes as well as how they intersect with the curriculum map (Table 5).
Since curriculum mapping is the most common approach, the vast majority of mapping activities have been led entirely by faculty, often without discussion with student affairs or students themselves. Thus, rarely do curriculum maps represent the entirety of a degree or the fulsomeness of the student learning experience. Yet, any of the approaches are applicable in an academic or student affairs setting. There are three commonly utilized approaches to mapping learning.
learning frameworks as a starting point allows for translation and cross-walking from the various places learning occurs. The case study of McKendree University provides an example of such an approach. McKendree University engaged with the DQP to refine their Diverse Perspectives outcome, as well as their innovative crosswalk of the DQP’s five areas of learning with McKendree’s seven student learning outcomes, the Association of American Colleges and Universities’ Liberal Education and America’s Promise (LEAP) Essential Learning Outcomes, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s (NCAA) Division II Life in the Balance key attributes. (Read the full case study.) An additional resource on mapping general education outcomes is that of Norfolk State University as shared in AAC&U’s Program Review publication (Cuevas, Matveev, & Miller, 2010).