In other words, a life course analysis posits that health is a consequence of multiple determinants and contexts that change as a person develops. This life course analysis focuses on the risk factors leading up to the occurrence of domestic violence rather than the impacts and responses following a domestic violence incident.
From the previous explanation, it is logical to conclude that the social learning theory suggests the cycle of domestic violence can be explained by the social learning theory. Through learning the weaknesses and observing the shortcomings of a potential victim, the abuser will use their knowledge to enact abuse.
In general, the accepted notion is that the factors occurring at a younger stage in life are predominately influential on crime risk than later life experiences. As a result of this idea, the life-course theory works closely with developmental theories to reinforce explanations of crime occurrences.
Thus, identity theory can help explain domestic violence by showing how a lack of identity confirmation at the individual level is tied to the control process and aggression at the interactive level. Read more about Identity Theory.
In my opinion, the sociological theory and the psychological theory best explain the causation of domestic abuse. The sociological theory, otherwise known as the social theory, believes that criminals commit crimes due to social forces, cultural differences, specific religious beliefs,...
Structural Functionalism Theory This theory believes that domestic violence occurs when there is a change of role in the family or relationship. According to structural functionalist theory, men hold instrumental position in society while women are expected to fill expressive roles.
Social Learning Theory Often conceptualized as the ''cycle of violence'' or ''intergenerational transmission theory'' when applied to the family, the theory states that people model behavior that they have been exposed to as children.
Conflict theory explains that domination and struggle often exist between the powerful and the suppressed. In the case of a domestic situation, violent man may wish to have his way; he may never wish to have his authority in the family challenged.
Domestic violence is a choice on the part of the abuser, but certain underlying factors might sometimes contribute to a person's propensity for abuse, including:experiencing childhood trauma.holding certain belief systems about hierarchy and domination.witnessing domestic violence as a child.
Dependency Relations Theory The role of dependency in FV has been found in child, elder, and spousal abuse. 90 Children remain dependent on their abusers because they tend to be smaller and weaker than adults and are unable to escape from an abusive family or violent neighborhood or support themselves.
These include: exchange theory, subcultural theory, resource theory, patriarchal theory, ecological theory, social learning theory, evolutionary theory, sociobiological theory, pathological conflict theory, psychopathological theory, general systems theory, and inequality theory.
According to the Conflict Theory conflict is an inevitable part of all groups distinguished by positions of power, compliance and opposing goals. The society's treatment of domestic violence can be perceived from this. The batterers were given a minor punishment or a lecture by the court.
Conflict theory focuses the way in which members of the family struggle for different aspects of life. This include struggle for resources and power. As the family grows individuals within the social unit compete for wealth and prestige hence it leads to creation of conflict.
The Conflict Approach. The conflict approach emphasizes inequality in the quality of health and of health-care delivery (Weitz, 2013). As noted earlier, the quality of health and health care differs greatly around the world and within the United States.
Other studies reveal even that has domestic violence is related to other social determinants of health including living conditions, poverty, employment, culture and education. A poor socio-economic environment can also lead to stress and inability to cope with problems, which in turn result in acts of violence.
Individual Risk FactorsHistory of violent victimization.Attention deficits, hyperactivity, or learning disorders.History of early aggressive behavior.Involvement with drugs, alcohol, or tobacco.Low IQ.Poor behavioral control.Deficits in social cognitive or information-processing abilities.High emotional distress.More items...
Why is the issue of domestic violence important? Domestic violence is a serious social problem and a national health concern with significant negative impacts on individuals and our communities. It is a primary cause of injury to women in the United States.
The root causes of domestic violence exist at the individual, family, community, and societal levels. The Foundation hypothesized that a life course analysis could identify critical points in a person’s life when specific risk factors could be targeted to effectively break the cycle of violence. Recognizing the strong evidence between exposure to violence in childhood and adolescence and the likelihood of perpetrating domestic violence, the Foundation sought a better understanding of the life course factors that contribute to violence and the inter- generational cycle of violence.
Life course and developmental factors are the ecological contexts, experiences, outcomes, and individual factors across the lifespan that increase or decrease the chances that a person will engage in abuse toward intimate partners or their children. As children develop, a convergence of individual characteristics and experiences in the social and physical environment makes the perpetration of relationship violence more or less likely. A life course perspective is useful for understanding when vio-lence is likely to emerge over time. It is a well-known pattern, for example, that relationship violence, child abuse, and crime increase precipitously in adolescence and emerging adulthood (ages 15 to 26) before falling just as precipitously after that.16
Domestic violence negatively impacts every community in the United States, affecting one in three women and one in four men ,1with profound and enduring consequences. In addition, one in five children witnesses parental assault,2leading to increased risk of experiencing or perpetrating domestic violence as adults, and continuing the cycle of violence.
Structural and cultural factors are the macro-level drivers of violence in relationships. These factors help explain domestic violence at the social and cultural levels and are reflections of cultural norms, socioeconomic conditions, and the availability of resources, to name a few. They broadly shape the prevalence and patterns of relationship violence in the general population. Perhaps the strongest structural factors associated with domestic violence are unemployment, poverty, gender-based wage inequality, and the concentration of disadvantage within neighborhoods.17 One study illustrat-ing the effects of broader economic factors on relationship violence found that the “Great Recession” from 2007 to 2010 led to a sharp increase in domestic violence victimization among women in the United States. One well-supported theory that connects structural factors like poverty to violence in relationships is known as the “family stress model,” which posits that economic pressure leads to psy-chological distress and conflict in families that, in turn, results in violence.18 Cultural factors refer to the values, beliefs, and norms of a society. Cultural factors such as gender roles, marital processes, norms related to childrearing practices, and the prevalence of harmful “masculine ideologies” are associat-ed with physical, sexual, and domestic violence in the overall population.19
For children in middle childhood, exposure to domes tic violence or child abuse can result in many of the same developmental outcomes seen in similarly exposed younger children, such as stress response dysregulation, PTSD, and insecure attachment.
The paper assesses the impact of the “punitive paradigm,” which undergirds the current domestic violence safety net. While it is vitally important to hold harm doers accountable, the paper finds that focusing primarily on the arrest and prosecution of perpetrators may actually create more harm than good for some victims, and that truly reducing domestic violence requires an earlier and more comprehensive approach to prevention.
breaking the cycle: a life course framework for preventing domestic violence
A life course perspective takes into account social, economic and environmental determinants of well-being with the goal of trying to better understand factors to ensure optimal health and developmental trajectories over a lifetime and across generations [20]. Several features of the life course approach help to create a framework by which we might systematically understand the determinants and consequences of child abuse or neglect, adult abuse, and intergenerational transmission of abuse.
First, a life course framework seeks to understand pathways and trajectories as an “integrated continuum of exposures, experiences and interactions” [20]. So, while research which explores the link between child and adult abuse without reference to a life course perspective does simultaneously consider these as variables in regression analyses, such approaches fail to uncover relevant modifiable contextual influences or co-occurring individual, familial and social determinants [23]. Second, cumulative impacts of adverse conditions early in life can determine adult development and well-being. Within these ideas of cumulative exposure and pathways and trajectories, a life course perspective seeks to further investigate the multi-level risk and protective factors (e.g., individual behaviours, family stressors or supports, neighbourhood deprivation or resources, and larger societal level policies) that shape current and future vulnerabilities, strengths and well-being. Thus, the life course framework seeks to capture the complexity and interaction of these early determinants in a dynamic fashion rather than just as indicators of the presence or absence of early risk factors on later outcomes. For example, Sampson and Laub [4,5], in their life course theory of crime, argue that while weakened social bonds can lead people on a trajectory to antisocial and criminal behavior; there are key turning or transition points along the life course (e.g., as employment, marriage and parenthood) that reestablish social bonds and promote prosocial behavior. Within their framework, movement away from adverse life experiences occurs when people are able to access positive human and social capital in the form of networks, social relationships and contexts [4,5,22,24]. Finally, a life course perspective enables us to link critical determinants over time using a developmental approach [25].
The “chain of risk” can be applied to intergenerational patterns of criminality. Risk of criminality for a woman or her children can be enhanced through an accumulation of exposures across generations. Among the women in this study, criminality in many forms—child abuse and neglect, substance use, and intimate partner abuse—spanned the generations.
Exposure to interparental violence and resultant modeling may then teach children that violence is a means of resolving partner conflict, causing them to tolerate such behaviour and increase their likelihood of violence perpetration in adulthood [15,16,17].
Pathways, meanwhile, refer to the multiple trajectories of education, work, and family that are followed by individuals and groups throughout society. In research and in theory, particular importance is placed on understanding the developmental implications of life transitions along the pathway, for e.g., transition from school to work, birth of first child, etc.[33]. Transitions early in life such as entry into adolescence can have long-term impacts because they influence subsequent transitions [4,5]. If, for example, transition into early adolescence involves criminality in the form of drug and alcohol use, school performance and work performance may suffer, resulting in a difficult transition from school to work.
Learned problem parenting, accumulated across generations, created environments of elevated risk for exposure to criminality as it pertained to childhood abuse or neglect. One woman’s exposure to criminality in childhood predisposed her to criminality in adulthood. Specifically, her experience of neglect by her mother during childhood was a contributing factor to her own neglect of her daughter.
As mentioned above, housing instability, in the form frequent housing mobility, was a contextual feature of childhood for women and for their children. Residence in social housing, and in some cases homelessness, was another feature of housing instability that contextualized both childhood and adulthood.
In particular, researchers have sought to identify the factors associated with intimate violence in an effort to develop theories explaining the causes of battering. One of the most widely cited theories in the domestic violence literature is Lenore Walker’s cycle of violence. According to Walker, the cycle of violence is characterized by three distinct phases which are repeated over and over again in the abusive relationship. As a result, domestic abuse rarely involves a single isolated incident of violence. Rather, the abuse becomes a repetitive pattern in the relationship. Read more about Cycle of Violence.
Identity theory provides an important avenue for theoretical development in domestic violence research because all behavior, including aggression, is rooted in issues of self and identity. To understand aggression, we need to understand the meanings individuals attribute to themselves in a situation, that is, their self-definitions or identities. In all interactions, the goal of individuals is to confirm their identities. When their identities are not confirmed, persons may control others in the situation to make them respond differently in order to confirm their identities. If control does not work, aggression may be used as a last resort to obtain control and, in turn, confirmation of identity. Thus, identity theory can help explain domestic violence by showing how a lack of identity confirmation at the individual level is tied to the control process and aggression at the interactive level. Read more about Identity Theory.
Victim-blaming theory describes the practice of holding victims partly responsible for their misfortune. It represents the faulting of individuals who have endured the suffering of crimes, hardships, or other misfortunes with either part or whole responsibility for the event. Often, victim-blaming theories rely on the premise that individuals should recognize the dangers that exist in society and therefore should take the necessary precautions to maintain a certain level of safety. Those who do not take such precautions are perceived as blameworthy for their demise even if they have not acted carelessly. These perceptions in effect shift the culpability away from the perpetrator of the crime onto the victim. When discussing issues of family violence, violence against women, or sexual assault, one often hears victim-blaming statements such as, ‘‘Why didn’t she leave?’’ or ‘‘She was asking for it.’’ Within the context of family violence, victim blaming often includes condemnation of the victim for staying in an abusive relationship. Read more about Victim-Blaming Theory.
Attachment theory is a useful lens through which to understand perpetrator behavior. It explains how early childhood experiences have led to a particular way of experiencing close relationships. It also helps therapists to see how, depending on the attachment status of the client, interventions will need to be developed to address their specific needs and that cookie cutter approaches will not advance the profession. The attachment findings make it clear that domestic violence is not just a result of social conditioning; if anything, it is at least the interaction between psychological conditioning and the social context. Therefore, while social changes are necessary, violence will never stop as long as the psychological and biological factors are minimized or altogether ignored. Read more about Attachment Theory.
As with the general exchange theory, the key assumption of an exchange theory of family violence is that human interaction is guided by the pursuit of rewards and the avoidance of punishment and costs. Simply stated, individuals will use force and violence in their relationships with intimates and family members if they believe that the rewards of force and violence outweigh the costs of such behavior. A second assumption is that a person who supplies reward services to another obliges the other to fulfill a reciprocal obligation; and thus, the second individual must furnish benefits to the first (Blau 1964). Blau (1964) explains that if reciprocal exchange occurs, the interaction continues. However, if reciprocity is not received, the interaction will be broken off. Of course, family relations, including partner relations, parent–child relations, and sibling relations, are more complex and have a unique social structure compared with the exchanges that typically exist outside of the family. Read more about Exchange Theory.
Since the late 1970s, researchers and theorists have focused increased attention on the widespread problem of domestic violence in contemporary society. Research has shown that domestic violence cuts across racial, ethnic, religious, and socioeconomic lines. In particular, researchers have sought to identify ...
The attachment findings make it clear that domestic violence is not just a result of social conditioning; if anything, it is at least the interaction between psychological conditioning and the social context. Therefore, while social changes are necessary, violence will never stop as long as the psychological and biological factors are minimized ...
The life course perspective is a broad approach that can be used in a variety of subject matters such as psychology, biology, history, and criminology. As a theory, the denotation establishes the connection between a pattern of life events and the actions that humans perform s.
When putting the theory into practice, key assumptions should be acknowledge. An assumption made continually by life- course theory supporters regards human behavior as being affected by nurture rather than nature.
From a criminological stance, the aspect of Mannheim’s discovery on the importance of influence is the primary focus. Although Mannheim’s research helped expand the life-course approach, generally in the social sciences field W.I Thomas and F. Znaniecki are the two sociologists credited to having ignited the broad theory.
With this project, Sampson and Laub ultimately ended up contradicting one of criminology’s most popular theorists, Travis Hirschi, by stating “criminality is not a constant, but affected by the larger social forces which change over a life-course” (Yeager).
The history of the theory partially stems from the 1920’s theorist, Karl Mannheim, who wrote the groundbreaking dissertation, The Sociological Problem of Generations.
In conclusion the Life Course Theory teaches us how people are analyzed based on their enviorments, culture and their social bonds that lead to anti-social behavior
Life-course criminology focuses on three issues: Development of antisocial behavior, poor parenting and bad conduct in early childhood as well as school failure and social rejection can lead to antisocial behavior . One of the first steps to deliquency is poor parenting.
One way one can aproach this through analizing crime by the reasoning behind it, such as the way a subject may have grown up in a abusive home which led the subject to later in life adopt the same behavior. Antisocial behavior begins early in life and often continues through adolescence and adulthood.
One of the theories that one can study through Criminology is the Life Course. Theory, which is “a perspective that focuses on the development of antisocial behavior, risk factors at different ages, and the effect of life events on individual development.” (Fuller: Pg 140.) This refers to a “multidisciplinary paradigm” for the study ...
Criminology; “The study of the making of laws, the breaking of laws, and the social reaction to the breaking of laws.” (Fuller: Pg 4.) In other words it is the study of how people acknowledge how crime is comited and the resoning behing it, as well as peoples reaction to it. One of the theories that one can study through Criminology is ...
The final Life Course issue is the effect of life events on individual’s development, which is the development of human beings, their societies, and cultures are impacted by genetic and social factors of course, family also plays a role in this. The individual begins his/her development as a result of genetics which are imbedded in the bio-chemical make-up of the humanbeing which is “How brains adopt psychological character depends not only on accidents of environmental events but also on their innate architecture.” (Gazzaniga, 1985, p.11). The basic needs of man/woman must be satisfied in order that he/she may function on the organic level. But in order that he/she may function satisfactorily on the social plane, the most fundamental of the basic social needs must be satisfied in an emotionally adequate manner for personal security or equilibrium (Montagu, 1966, p.99). In most cases, the family social environment influences the person’s early belief and value systems.
Studies have shown that children who are antisocial perform poorly in school. They might disrupt the classroom and fail to do their homework. They spend less academic time on task and lack academic skills such as regular attendance and participation in the class.
An additional theory that falls under the umbrella of the sociological theory which, in my opinion, explains domestic violence is the rational choice theory . The rational choice theory has laid the groundwork to establish a better understanding regarding social and economically driven behavior (Schacter, Gilbert, & Wegner, 2009). This theory believes that an individual will choose criminal behavior by “free will” after weighing out the rewards and benefits verses the consequences or punishment for their behavior (Gosselin, 2005).
From the previous explanation, it is logical to conclude that the social learning theory suggests the cycle of domestic violence can be explained by the social learning theory. Through learning the weaknesses and observing the shortcomings of a potential victim, the abuser will use their knowledge to enact abuse.
The sociological theory contains two subtopic theories which are called structural and subcultural theories. The structural theory, which applies to domestic violence, believes that individuals who possess low or lack of educational opportunities, a low income status, and/or a lack of community support are susceptible to choose a life ...
Due to the complexity of this crime, many criminologists and socialologists have studied its causes and the effects in order to determine social policies and additional theories to better understand the causation of domestic violence. The social policies and theories that are developed from this research can better explain, educate, and assist the victims of domestic abuse, the judicial system, and law enforcement on how to gain a clearer understanding regarding the relationship between crime causation, criminal behavior, and domestic abuse (Greene, Heilburn, Fortune and Nietzel, 2007).
Most abusers will not openly abuse their victims in front of others in order to deter detection. Detection is not an option for most abusers, since they are familiar with the consequences of their actions. A second example of a theory that would explain domestic violence would be the social learning theory.
Personal choice, as referred to by the rational choice theory, suggests the abuser does understand the causes and effects of his or her actions by the selective methods they choose to inflict the abuse. In summary, the exact causation of domestic violence is a mystery.
Each of these theories have assisted the criminal justice system by providing specific knowledge and data that has been helpful with the establishment of laws (specific laws that fit the crime of domestic violence such as the stalking law), sentencing practices (different punishment guidelines for acts of domestic abuse that differ from non-domestic situations), and social policies (aid and education for abuse victims) (Greene, Heilburn, Fortune and Nietzel, 2007).