Course Evaluations at Berkeley offers departments the opportunity to coordinate course evaluations through a customizable online system with easy management and reporting. This campus-provided common-good service is managed by RTL and is available to departments who have opted into the service.
Course Evaluations at Berkeley offers departments the opportunity to coordinate course evaluations through a customizable online system with easy management and reporting. This campus-provided common-good service is managed by RTL and is available to departments who have opted into the service.
Course-to-course articulation – At this level, a transfer course has been approved as equivalent to a Berkeley course and may satisfy all degree requirements* in which the Berkeley course is accepted. *The American Cultures requirement is the one exception.
The Central Evaluation Unit (CEU) conducts an evaluation of each transcript submitted to Berkeley and determines if a course is UC transferable and at what level of articulation. Articulation is essentially an agreement that a course from an institution outside of Berkeley can be used to satisfy a degree requirement.
Course Evaluations allows for the automation and simplification of final semester reviews for instructors and allows students to access their evaluations forms at their convenience. The reporting of results is automated and helps departments save resources by freeing up staff time from evaluation creation and reporting tasks.
Are students required to complete evaluations? No, but they are strongly encouraged to provide feedback that will inform and improve the teaching on our campus. Instructors may not penalize students who do not not complete evaluations.
A course-by-course evaluation allows us to better understand the U.S. equivalency for courses and grades obtained at colleges and universities outside of the United States. We require that all candidates with a bachelor's degree from an international university submit a full course-by-course evaluation of their degree.
You can access the course evaluations system directly without needing to click on an email link by going to https://course-evaluations.berkeley.edu/ and logging in with your CalNet ID and passphrase.
What is a Course Evaluation? Course evaluations are anonymous surveys completed by students, usually at the end of a term, to reflect on the efficacy of an instructor and the course.
Here's our simple, three-step evaluation process: Submit your application and receive your WES reference number. Read our document requirements and send in your documents. Remember to include your WES reference number. We verify your credentials, create your report, and deliver it to your recipients.
Grade Point Average (GPA) is determined by multiplying the credits per course by the quality points for the grade for that course, repeating this procedure for each course, totaling the credit hour quality points thus obtained, and dividing by the total number of credits.
Yes, student responses are anonymous. Instructors do not know which students responded or what responses individual students provided. However, instructors can track overall response rates for their courses.
Course evaluations usually open two weeks before the end of a course and remain open through the last week of classes and reading days. Your responses are confidential and your professors will not be able to see your name or user ID in relation to your answers.
A: No, this is not possible. Instructors and TA's are not able to see their evaluation reports until they have turned in grades. The evaluation reports they are provided contain aggregated information and no specific responses or ratings can be traced back to individual students.
In addition to helping professors improve their classes, these evaluations play a role in helping administration make tenure decisions and influence where potential raises are offered, Carini said. Though they aren't the deciding factor, these surveys are one component of how teaching is evaluated.
How to respond to student evaluationsGet past your gut reaction. Anyone who has received negative feedback knows criticism can stir up emotions ranging from disbelief to discouragement. ... Consider the context. ... Seek teaching advice if you need it. ... Get feedback more often. ... Show students you care.
If you attended UC Berkeley Extension’s Concurrent Enrollment program, the CEU conducts an “internal transfer” 6-8 weeks after the term ends to add the Concurrent Enrollment courses to your Berkeley undergraduate record. This happens automatically for all matriculated students that were not dismissed during the time they enrolled in this program.
There are two levels of transfer course evaluation and articulation:
Unit credits can be awarded for college-level transfer coursework that is similar in scope and depth to undergraduate courses offered at the UC campuses . The transfer course must: be listed in the institution’s official course catalog for the year in which the course was completed. include the same, or similar, content to UC undergraduate courses.
Before enrolling in a transfer course, consult the unit assigning the requirement (i.e. your college advising office, or major/minor department) to be sure the transfer course can be used to satisfy the requirement.
To request a transfer course be reviewed for UC transferability, please contact the CEU by opening a CSC case. This evaluation can also confirm how many units you may earn from the course and whether lower or upper division units will be awarded.
If you completed more than 70 lower division units, however, all courses will still be considered for degree requirements; a maximum of 70 units will be counted toward the 120 minimum units needed for graduation.
If you have already completed the transfer course, then the review for UC transferability will occur when the official transcript is received.
Formative Evaluations are evaluations FOR learning. They are often ungraded and informal. Their aim is to provide both the students and instructor with a gauge of where their level of understanding is at the current moment, and enable the instructor to adjust accordingly to meet the emerging needs of the class.
Formative evaluations are particularly important because they allow you to make changes that affect the current students, while the end of term forms only affect future classes. In addition, formative evaluations signal your class that you are indeed interested in what and how they're learning, and in their responses to your teaching.
Angelo & Cross (1993, Classroom Assessment Techniques) highlight characteristics of classroom assessment: 1 Learner‐Centered – its focus is on observing and improving learning, rather than on observing and improving teaching 2 Teacher‐Directed – the individual teacher decides what to assess, how to assess, and how to respond to the information gained through the assessment 3 Mutually Beneficial – students reinforce course content and strengthen their self‐assessment skills; faculty sharpen their teaching focus by asking 3 questions: “What are the essential skills and knowledge I am trying to teach?”, “How can I find out whether students are learning them?”, and “How can I help students learn better?” 4 Formative – its purpose is to improve the quality of student learning, not to provide evidence for evaluating or grading students; it provides information on what, how much, and how well students are learning 5 Context‐Specific – the assessment technique is chosen to fit the subject matter and the needs of the particular class 6 Ongoing – it is an ongoing process, i.e. the creation and maintenance of a classroom “feedback loop”; as this approach becomes integrated into everyday classroom activities, the communications loop between faculty (teaching) and students (learning) becomes more efficient and effective; it provides early feedback – before students are evaluated for grades – so that necessary adjustments can be made
Summative assessment tools most commonly utilized are mid-term or end-of-term exams to determine the level at which students achieved the expectations for their learning as prescribed by the instructor and to identify instructional areas that may need additional attention.
Formative – its purpose is to improve the quality of student learning, not to provide evidence for evaluating or grading students; it provides information on what, how much, and how well students are learning
Check student understanding in a lesson by asking them to take out a sheet of paper and take one minute to, for example, write down an explanation of a concept, solve an equation, or draw a main point from a reading.
After working through a topic, ask students to explain the content to a lay audience in their own words.
Student Evaluation (end of course) Current students can comment on an instructor's ability to communicate clearly, the extent and level of the instructor's course preparation, whether the instructor makes effective use of class time, how sensitive and responsive the instructor is to difficulties students may be having in the course, the workload, ...
It is recommended that departmental evaluation forms give students the opportunity both to numerically rate instructors and to comment narratively on instructors' performance. Frequency of administration. Every course should be evaluated by students each time it is offered.
Departments should retain raw student evaluation data for three years for all faculty; summary information (including statistical data and syntheses of open ended responses) should become a permanent part of the teacher's file.
Department chairs should meet with faculty members whose ratings are significantly below departmental norms to advise them of ways they might improve their teaching and to inform them of the campus resource for instructional improvement, the Center for Teaching and Learning.
On the “Large Classes and Seminars” evaluations, for example, 1/8 means that this question was ranked first among the 8 questions in the evaluation form that have a possibility of 5 or 7 answers (questions 1-6 & 9-10). This will be 1/10 in the “Skills” evaluations, 1/5 in the “Clinic Seminars,” and 1/6 in the “Clinics.”
They allow us to gather information about the course itself and the teachers who instruct the students. Because the information about the teachers is often used to determine future employment, awards and stipends , a teacher cannot share a set of evaluations with another professor or instructor. Each person who instructs students at Boalt, to any degree, needs his or her own set of evaluations. This is extremely important and there are no exceptions. Please do not exempt yourself.
Because the information about the teachers is often used to determine future employment, awards and stipends, a teacher cannot share a set of evaluations with another professor or instructor. Each person who instructs students at Boalt, to any degree, needs his or her own set of evaluations.