The Union`s "Anaconda Plan
The Anaconda Plan is the name applied to a U.S. Union Army outline strategy for suppressing the Confederacy at the beginning of the American Civil War. Proposed by Union general-in-chief Winfield Scott, the plan emphasized a Union blockade of the Southern ports, and called for an advance do…
Full Answer
Sep 06, 2010 · The Anaconda Plan was the initial Civil War strategy devised by General Winfield Scott of the U.S. Army to put down the rebellion by the Confederacy in 1861. Scott came up with the plan in early 1861, intending it as a way to end the …
The main purpose of the Anaconda plan was to defeat the rebellion by blockading southern ports and controlling the Mississippi river. This would cut off and isolate the south from the outside world. An Anaconda is a snake that squeezes and suffocates it’s victim. The Anaconda Plan was designed to do the same thing, it was a great snake that would surround and squeeze the …
Nov 12, 2021 · The main goals of the Anaconda Plan were to 1) form an Atlantic and Gulf Coast blockade along the Southern ports and 2) take control of/block the Mississippi River region to cut Confederate forces...
Sep 29, 2021 · The Anaconda Plan was the first Union strategy for winning the Civil War, and though it was not officially adopted, it still had a big impact on how the war was fought. An error occurred trying to...
The three main steps of the Anaconda Plan were 1) surround the Confederacy by sea and by land blockades, 2) take control of the Mississippi River t...
The main goal of the Anaconda Plan was to cut off supplies to Confederate forces and divide and conquer their fighting force. Lastly, the end goal...
The Anaconda Plan was a multi-step approach for the Union to win the war against the Confederacy. Parts of the plan were viewed as very successful...
The Anaconda Plan was developed at the beginning of the American Civil War. It was the Union’s strategic plan to defeat the Confederacy.
It was important because the strategic plan would have eventually ended the Civil War, ideally with minimal casualties on both sides. It was a humanitarian way of defeating the rebellion as opposed to invading the south with massive numbers of troops, killing, burning and capturing everything in sight. General Scott’s Anaconda Plan was ...
The Union would have slowly and methodically cut the Confederacy in half by taking the Mississippi river and the rebellion would have withered on the vine from a lack of food and supplies and forced to surrender.
The second objective of the plan was to transport roughly 60,000 Union troops in 40 steam transports escorted by upwards of 20 steam gunboats down the Mississippi river. Union troops would capture and hold forts and towns all along the Mississippi.
While the Union navy did set up a blockade at the start of the rebellion, it was not strong enough at the beginning of the war to adequately blockade the entire south. The naval blockade alone would not have defeated the rebellion, even if the Union also controlled the entire Mississippi river.
After a long siege General Ulysses S. Grant captured the city of Vicksburg on July 4th 1863 giving the Union control of the Mississippi river and effectively cutting the Confederacy in two.
The plan was developed by General Winfield Scott at the beginning of the Civil War following the Confederate attack on Fort Sumter on April 12th 1861.
The Anaconda Plan refers to a Northern/Union strategy of the American Civil War in the 19th century. The plan was created by a Union general after the Confederate attack at Fort Sumter in 1861.
The Civil War lasted in the U.S. from 1861-1865 and was fought between the Union/North and the Confederates/South. The main cause of the war related to Southerners' belief that their way of life, an agriculture/plantation-based system with the use of free slave labor, was threatened by the newly elected President Lincoln.
The Anaconda Plan, although never officially put into effect, was implemented in parts in a multi-pronged effort. There were three main parts of the plan, and its goals were to cut off supplies from the South and also cut their defenses into two to weaken them.
Lesson Transcript. The Anaconda Plan was a strategy created by Union General Winfield Scott in 1861, early on in the Civil War. It called for strangling the Southern Confederacy, much like an Anaconda. It was never officially adopted by the Union government.
Southern armies had to be crushed, and numerous cities had to be seized by Union forces. While Winfield Scott's Anaconda Plan was never officially adopted, it did serve as a framework for what eventually occurred throughout the Civil War.
By May 1861, Scott had formulated a strategy for subduing the Confederacy, which was based off of plans the U.S. military had formulated for putting down a domestic rebellion. The plan called for two essential elements. First, Scott proposed blockading the entire South with the U.S. Navy closing all Southern ports. This would have enormous consequences on the nascent Confederacy, such as stopping shipments from reaching port cities, disrupting the Southern economy, preventing Confederate armies from receiving necessary military supplies, hurting civilians and undermining the South's ties with other nations. Second, Scott suggested taking a force of roughly 80,000 men and moving down the Mississippi River, taking every key city and port, with the intended effect of cutting the Confederacy in two. Scott did not himself refer to this plan as the Anaconda Plan, but it gained that moniker because of its emphasis on putting a stranglehold on the Confederacy, much like an anaconda snake does with its prey.
After this lesson is over, you should be able to: Describe Winfield Scott's early Union battle plan against the South known as the Anaconda Plan. Recognize why the plan hinged on sea blockades and controlling the Mississippi River. Explain why the Anaconda Plan was not formally adopted by the Union.
His strategy became known as the Anaconda Plan.
At the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861, Winfield Scott was one of the most accomplished and recognized generals in American history. Born in 1786, he entered the U.S. military in 1808 as an artillery captain. During the War of 1812, he rose through the ranks, becoming a brigadier general in 1814. Following the war, Scott was a leading figure in studying military tactics and training new soldiers, holding several high-ranking and prestigious posts. By 1841, Scott became the highest-ranking general in the United States army. This position meant that Scott played a leading role in the war with Mexico. In addition to being the overall United States commander, Scott led an army and captured Mexico City, helping to ensure an American victory in the war. With this fame, Scott ran for president as a Whig in 1852, but lost to Franklin Pierce. He remained as the commander of all United States troops until the start of the Civil War in 1861.
When war broke out between the North and the South with the firing on Fort Sumter in April 1861, Winfield Scott was a close adviser to the newly elected President Abraham Lincoln, who himself had no experience commanding troops.
The Anaconda Plan was the nickname attached to Lieutenant General Winfield Scott ‘s comprehensive plan to defeat the Confederacy at the start of the American Civil War (1861–1865). Scott called for a strong defense of Washington, D.C., a blockade of the Confederacy’s Atlantic and Gulf coasts, and a massive land and naval attack along ...
General Winfield Scott. Still, the Anaconda Plan had problems. Scott’s military and political approach was essentially conciliatory. He assumed that the military only needed to create the right circumstances for Unionism to reemerge in the South.
He did not plan for a long-term occupation of the South, and he failed to see at least one important effect of the blockade.
The imperative of 1861 was action, and any plan that did not immediately strike at Richmond was unwelcome. Of course, Scott did call for a massive attack on the Confederacy, with anywhere from 60,000 to 80,000 men in the Mississippi River Valley.
The Confederacy’s third secretary of war, George Wythe Randolph of Virgin ia, advocated a focus on the Western Theater and was overruled by Jefferson Davis .) The cry of the day was “On to Richmond” and not “On to Natchez.”.
Grant claimed Vicksburg, Mississippi, in July 1863, the Mississippi River belonged to the Union, creating logistical chaos for the Confederacy. What remained was, to some extent, a war of attrition in which Union men and matériel slowly overwhelmed the South.
In the early days of the Civil War, General-in-Chief Winfield Scott 's proposed strategy for the war against the South had two prominent features: first, all ports in the seceding states were to be rigorously blockaded; second, a strong column of perhaps 80,000 men should use the Mississippi River as a highway to thrust completely through the Confederacy.
The Anaconda had a historical development, both in its origin and the way it played out in the experience of battle. The blockade had already been proclaimed by President Lincoln.
USS Kanawha cutting out a blockade runner at the entrance to Mobile Bay.
Although almost a century and a half has elapsed since the end of the Civil War, the importance of the Anaconda Plan remains to some extent a matter of debate. Clearly, the war was not the relatively bloodless affair that General Scott promised in his original proposal.
ORA (Official records, armies): War of the Rebellion: a compilation of the official records of the Union and Confederate Armies.
This page uses Creative Commons Licensed content from Wikipedia ( view authors) .
The problem with the thesis that the Anaconda Plan won the ACW is that is not what happened! The Union did have to invade the Confederacy. Yes, the Union did use both of the two part strategies, and both of those 2 strategies helped the Union win the ACW.
Scott's Anaconda Plan assumed that those achieving those two strategies would be enough of a bargaining chip for the Union to cause the CSA to decide to re-enter the Union.
Leftyhunter". Leftyhunter did not explicitly say that the Anaconda Plan won the American Civil War (ACW). Perhaps Leftyhunter does not think that the Anaconda Plan won the Civil War. However, to me, leftyhunter's post suggests that he might think that the Anaconda Plan is what won the Civil War.
The Union did have to invade the Confederacy. Yes, the Union did use both of the two part strategies, and both of those 2 strategies helped the Union win the ACW. However, if the Union only did Winfield Scott's Anaconda Plan, the Union would not have won the ACW.
Winfield Scott thought the key to the Anaconda Plan was it would allow the Union to win the ACW with a minimum of troops and a minimum of bloodshed because the Union would not have to invade the Confederacy itself by the Anaconda Plan.
However, if the Union only did Winfield Scott's Anaconda Plan, the Union would not have won the ACW. It was the invasions of the Confederacy that proved decisive in winning the ACW. The Anaconda Plan was only a tiny part of what won the ACW.
If Winfield Scott was correct, the CSA would have surrendered when Vicksburg and Port Hudson surrendered in the summer of 1863 because both parts of Winfield Scott's Anaconda Plan were fully implemented by then . It's a myth that the Anaconda Plan is the strategy that won the ACW.