Jun 07, 2017 · 5. How did Cass’s treatment of the Indians compare to Jacksons? It seems as if he felt more empathy towards them, while Jackson was cruel. “He wished that all this could have been done with "a smaller sacrifice; that the aboriginal population had accommodated themselves to the inevitable change of their condition... .
In fact most politicians in Jackson's time agreed with his decisions about the Indians. As president, Jackson and his successor Martin Van Buren (1782–1862) forced 70,000 Indians from their homes. Troops continued to attack even after Indians surrendered. Secretary of War Lewis Cass (1782–1866) considered the Indians "a barbarous people."
May 31, 2017 · Lewis Cass, shared an unbroken bond of trust with the Indians. She claimed that Cass himself had told her so. “I never broke my word to an Indian,” she remembered hearing her grandfather say on more than one occasion, “and no Indian ever broke his word to me.”1 Elizabeth‟s assertion that Governor Cass had great respect for Native Americans
harrison plead to the Indians to test the prophets deity, if he is really sent by God. Could the prophet really make the sun stand still-the moon alters its course or dead rise to the grove. The message backfired and the prophets announced to every Indian he could reach that he would indeed make the sun stand still.
Introduction. The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.Jan 22, 2019
President Jackson told Congress that he felt the act was fair because a fair exchange of land was being granted and because the General Government proposed to pay the whole expense of the red man's removal and settlement...
What does Jackson name as the advantages of the Indian Removal Act for Native Americans? By separating them from whites, Native Americans would be free from the power of the U.S. government. He believes it would allow their tribes to live according to their own ways in peace, thus reducing their decline.
There were two main reasons the Indian Removal Act was wrong. The first reason is that the 5th amendment states, “No person shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…” Taking the Native Americans land with the Indian Removal Act violates one of the amendments.
Which argument did Andrew Jackson use to persuade people that the Indian Removal Act was a good decision? Removing American Indians will alow white settlers to become wealthier. What was the main purpose of Andrew Jackson's message in "On Indian Removal"?
He declared that the only hope for the Southeastern tribes' survival would be for them to give up all their land and move west of the Mississippi River. Jackson warned the tribes that if they failed to move, they would lose their independence and fall under state laws. Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress.
This chapter describes how the U.S. government's desire for expansion led to the forced removal of Indians. Zinn adds "the word 'force' cannot convey what happened." He discusses how different Indian tribes reacted to U.S. aggression.
Zinn starts by comparing two kinds of oppression: women's limitations and Indian removal. By the 19th century the wealthy white rulers of America had a stronghold. Other groups were treated according to how they met the needs or activated the fears of these rulers.
The Seal of the Territory of Wisconsin reflects 1812 attitudes: “Civilization Succeeds Barbarism.”
The Indian Removal Act authorized the negotiation of treaties that would exchange Indian lands in the east for land in the unorganized territories of the trans-Mississippi West.
Before he became president, Andrew Jackson had been instrumental in moving Indians from their eastern lands – both by waging war against Native Americans and negotiating treaties to trade their eastern lands for land west of the Mississippi River. Once elected president, Jackson outlined his proposed Indian removal policy in his Second Annual Message to Congress in 1830. At Jackson’s request, Congress began crafting and debating a bill about Indian removal to western territories. Congress passed the bill on May 28, 1830; Jackson signed it into law on June 30, 1830.
During the forced march, which came to be known as “the Trail of Tears,” over 3,000 Cherokee died.
In 1818, he led an invasion of Florida to punish the Seminole nation for assisting runaway slaves. And, of the eleven major treaties signed between 1814 and 1824, Jackson negotiated nine of them. No other American was so instrumental to Indian Removal.
Era 4: Expansion and Reform (1801-1861) Standard 1: United States territorial expansion between 1801 and 1861, and how it affected relations with external powers and Native Americans
The War of 1812 and Indian Wars: 1812-1821. A timeline of Andrew Jackson’s military and political career from the War of 1812 to governing Florida Territory.
The great loss of life among the Red Sticks leads to the surrender of Red Eagle and the Creek rebellion is defeated. 23 million acres of Indian-occupied lands will be ceded to the U.S., including lands of former allies as well as enemies, and subsequently opened to American land speculators and farmers.
Jackson engages in armed brawl with brothers Jesse and Thomas Hart Benton in a Nashville hotel. Jackson is seriously wounded by a pistol shot in the shoulder.
Adams-Onis treaty ceding Florida to the U.S. is signed and ratified by the U.S. Senate. Spain will ratify the treaty in October 1820 and the Senate re-ratify in February 1821.
Treaty of Ghent signed by the British and Americans , defining negotiated terms for the end of the War of 1812. Word of the peace treaty travels slowly to the U.S.