course hero what was the mean score of voyeurism in the reality tv group? 2.80 2.92 5.32 3.5

Why did Rachel Thompson blame the show?

In her CNN article, Rachel Thompson blames the show for neglecting to provide mental health resources for its stars after the show ended. Thompson argues that this commodification of reality TV stars is toxic and possibly inhumane v. S hock Treatment, 1981.

Was shock treatment a reality TV show?

Reality TV in the 80s was nothing like what it is today. Yet, with all of the game shows, dating/marriage contests, and Real Housewives we have now, Shock Treatment showcases a reality TV-centric society that’s reminiscent of ours today. The entire movie takes place in a sound studio, and the audience members even sleep in their seats.

What is voyeurism in TV?

Voyeurism is defined broadly as a disorder that causes a person to gain pleasure from watching unsuspecting individuals.

Why do people have voyeuristic tendencies?

In the cases of television, people may have voyeuristic tendencies because they enjoy any chance to see what they would otherwise be unable to see when the curtains are left open on others’ lives. Reality TV is the backstage pass.

1. The cost of inequality to middle-class households

This figure shows that the stakes of rising inequality for the broad American middle class are enormous. The figure compares the income growth of the middle three-fifths of American households since 1979 to their income growth had there been no growth in inequality.

2. Wage trends of the last three decades

Slow and unequal wage growth in recent decades stems from a growing wedge between overall productivity—the improvements in the amount of goods and services produced per hour worked—and the pay (wages and benefits) received by a typical worker.

3. Factors driving wage stagnation and inequality

In a nation of increasing inequality, the most extreme wage disparities are between the heads of large American corporations and typical workers. This figure tracks the ratio of pay of CEOs at the 350 largest public U.S. firms to the pay of typical workers in those firms’ industries. In 1965, these CEOs made 20 times what typical workers made.

About the authors

Lawrence Mishel, a nationally recognized economist, has been president of the Economic Policy Institute since 2002. Prior to that he was EPI’s first research director (starting in 1987) and later became vice president. He is the coauthor of all 12 editions of The State of Working America. He holds a Ph.D.