course hero what is the theory behind the doctrine of respondeat superior?

Full Answer

What is respondeat superior?

Overview A legal doctrine, most commonly used in tort, that holds an employer or principal legally responsible for the wrongful acts of an employee or agent, if such acts occur within the scope of the employment or agency. Typically when respondeat superior is invoked, a plaintiff will look to hold both the employer and the employee liable.

What happens when respondeat superior is invoked?

Typically when respondeat superior is invoked, a plaintiff will look to hold both the employer and the employee liable. As such, a court will generally look to the doctrine of joint and several liability when assigning damages .

What is respondeat superior liability in a car accident case?

One of the hazards of having employees use vehicles to perform work for you is possible respondeat superior liability. Unlike some of the other liabilities of having employees use your vehicles, you face respondeat superior liability even if your employees get into accidents while driving their own vehicles.

How do you defend a respondeat superior claim?

Thus, defending a respondeat superior claim typically involves one of the following options: Establishing that an employee committed an intentional wrong, which makes it unlikely that he or she was acting within the scope of employment. Be careful about relying too much on this type of defense.

What is respondeat superior?

Typically when respondeat superior is invoked, a plaintiff will look to hold both the employer and the employee liable.

What is the third restatement of torts?

The Third Restatement of Torts helps to outline the difference between an employee and an independent contractor for the purpose of respondeat superior. It presents a fairly thorough balancing test : the extent of control that the agent and the principal have agreed the principal may exercise over details of the work.

What is the characteristic test?

Characteristics Test. If the employee's action is common enough for that job that the action could be fairly deemed to be characteristic of the job, then the employer will be liable for harm resulting from the employee’s actions.

Is there a national standard for respondent superior?

There is not a national standard for respondeat suprerior. Because states create their own standards for the doctrine, different jurisdictions will use different tests to prove respondeat superior. However, most jurisdictions will use 1 of the following 2 tests: Benefits Test.

Can a respondeat superior be compared to strict liability?

As such, respondeat superior may be compared with strict liability.

Why is respondeat superior important?

In many respondeat superior cases, this may be your most viable option because accidents do happen while employees are performing duties within the scope of their jobs. While you can't always avoid such accidents, the right insurance coverage can go a long way to avoid a devastating financial loss.

What is respondeat superior liability?

Respondeat superior liability explained. The phrase respondeat superior is a Latin term that lawyers sometimes use. The term may be "translated" as: If your employee, is at fault for an accident (or an incident); and. was doing work for you at the time of the accident/incident (lawyers will often refer to this as "acting within the scope ...

Can respondeat liability come after an accident?

In fact, you'll find that respondeat superior liability can come into play after any unfortunate incident — not just auto accidents — where an employee has harmed someone else or someone else's property.

Overview

• A legal doctrine, most commonly used in tort, that holds an employer or principal legally responsible for the wrongful acts of an employee or agent, if such acts occur within the scope of the employment or agency. Typically when respondeat superior is invoked, a plaintiff will look to hold both the employer and the employee liable. As such, a court...

See more on law.cornell.edu

Jurisdictional Differences

Strict Liability Comparison

Exceptions

Further Reading