Why does Beveridge believe the US should annex the Philippines? Beveridge also argues that the United States would benefit due to the strategic location of the Philippines, it being in the Pacific and near to China, as well as its rich resources. Beveridge sees the annexation of the Philippines as an obligation of the American people.
Nov 05, 2018 · According to Albert Beveridge, why is annexation of the Philippines an honorable course of action? Even though some anti-imperialists like George F. Hoar were against the annexation of the Philippines as they believed it was against the traditional American republican deals, Albert Beveridge was an imperialist who supported this idea.
Senator Beveridge's speech on the Philippines reflects an era of American imperialism in the Pacific. U.S. Senator Albert J. Beveridge speaks on the Philippine Question, U.S. Senate, Washington, D.C., January 9, 1900 | US-China Institute
Beveridge is known as one of the most prominent American imperialists. He supported the annexation of the Philippines and, along with Republican leader Henry Cabot Lodge, campaigned for the construction of a new navy.
What does Albert Beveridge say about governing people without their approval? He explains that we govern many people without their consent (children, land, the Indians) and that the people of the Philippines would prefer a just, human, civilizing government.
How does Beveridge justify the lack of consent from the people of the Philippines? It is irrelevant for savage and uncivilized people who know no better.
Americans who advocated annexation evinced a variety of motivations: desire for commercial opportunities in Asia, concern that the Filipinos were incapable of self-rule, and fear that if the United States did not take control of the islands, another power (such as Germany or Japan) might do so.