May 07, 2017 · Question 7 0 out of 3 points A complex legal issue in Internet law is cybersquatting, which Selected Answer: is used to "shake down" illegal registrants of domain names. Correct Answer: is a technique to grab domain names in bad faith.
May 04, 2019 · Question 7 3 out of 3 points A complex legal issue in Internet law is cybersquatting, which Selected Answer: is a technique to grab domain names in bad faith. Correct Answer: is a technique to grab domain names in bad faith.
View full document. See Page 1. 32. It is a law in the Philippines that aims to address legal issues concerning online interactions and harmful internet behavior in the Philippines. It aims to prevent and punish cybercrime in the country. 1. Cybersquatting 2. Cybercrime Act 3. …
May 07, 2017 · View Test Prep - week 5 quiz 4 from BUS 300 at Strayer University. Question 1 3 out of 3 points The overriding concern the SEC has is that Selected Answer: all investors have an opportunity to learn
Cybersquatting – is when someone registers a domain name, in bad faith, violating the rights of the trademark owner. They usually intend to extort payment from the trademark owner, and they keep the names to sell later to the highest bidder.
Spam is accounted for around 80% of all U.S. email. 20% of U.S. residents actually buy products from spammers, and this makes it worthwhile for them to continue to harass us with unsolicited emails. There are no laws to prohibit spamming, but there are laws to regulate spam. There are also laws that prevent email harvesting (programs that read through websites looking for email address to add to their database). Many states require opt-in or opt-out options in the email. There are laws that prohibit false headings and laws against spammers that identify their message as coming from someone else. Trademark and unfair competition laws have been used against a spammer whos message reads that it is coming from someone else, and in one case a man was sentenced to 3 years in prison and $16 million in fines. Unfortunately it is very difficult to enforce the statewide spam laws because a sender really has no way of knowing all the states he is sending his spam to by the list of email addresses he has.
Protect Yourself from Identity Theft 1 Cross-shred documents 2 Review your credit report twice a year 3 Be aware of billing cycles and put vacation holds on mail 4 Never reveal your Social Security number unless absolutely necessary 5 Don’t carry seldom used credit cards or unnecessary id’s 6 Be aware that identity stealers are not always strangers 7 Don’t give out personal information over the phone, mail or posts on the internet 8 Take out the hard drive from a computer and destroy it before discarding. Even if deleted, personal information can still be recovered from a computer’s hard drive
There are good reasons to register a trademark though. One reason, like copyrights, it establishes a public record. The second reason is that it needs to be registered in order to file for trademark infringement. It also helps to establish trademark in other countries and to stop imports of infringing foreign goods from entering the country. A trademark is valid indefinitely, but if not maintained it can be lost and fall into public domain. For instance, if a trademark becomes a common phrase, then it will be deemed lost and the trademarked term considered common usage (Aspirin, Allen Wrench, Granola, and Yo-Yo are just a few examples).
Fair Use. ‘Fair Use’ allows limited use of a copyrighted work. Some examples of what are considered ‘fair use’ are: teaching, criticism, comment, news reporting, and research. Only a court can decide if a copyrighted works use was considered ‘fair use’.
In a case of ‘Work-Made-For-Hire’, the protection term is 95 years from first publication or 120 years from the year of creation (whichever comes first). Once copyrights expire they become part of the public domain and are free to use by anyone.
The first amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to free speech. But there are instances when that can provoke a lawsuit. The four main causes of action against speech on the internet is:
Internet law refers to how legal principles and legislation govern the use of the internet in all its forms. Another term for internet law is cyberlaw. Unlike other areas of the law, internet law cannot be identified as one solid, stable, and specific field of practice. Rather, it incorporates and applies principles from several traditional fields, ...
Norms: On the internet, as in all areas of life, human behavior is governed by cultural norms. These can help fill in the gaps left by formal regulations. For instance, in deleting inappropriate comments from an online forum, moderators go above and beyond legal requirements and rely on social norms.
Copyright protects authors' rights to their own material so that other people cannot manipulate, steal, or earn profit from it. Naturally, copyright applies to online content just as it does to more tangible work. It is helpful for organizations and individuals to place copyright and trademark signs on their websites and other materials to express their ownership and warn people not to steal or misuse their work.
In 2002, a serious of electronic commerce regulations were initiated, and the European E-commerce Directive was brought into UK law. These laws were meant to affirm that electronic contracts are in fact legally binding, and that they can have the power to control online commerce behavior across Europe.
Lawyers, policymakers, and governments often look to recent cases that occurred in their region in order to decide how to resolve new conflicts. The following are some recent developments that affect internet law.
Architecture: Where laws are government-imposed rules, the term "architecture" refers to the actual technological limitations of the internet. It encompasses everything that affects how information can be transmitted on the internet, from search engines and filters to encryption and coding. Norms: On the internet, as in all areas ...
When a court case hinged on evidence that came from a cell phone tracking device, a New York state judge declined to consider such data in the evaluation of a case. It was decided that such intimate technology should not be used to gather information, and this ruling may be used as an example in upcoming cases.