10. what is meant by "mitigation" of damages with respect to lost wages? course hero

by Prof. Lexi Huels 5 min read

Mitigation of damages is an attempt to prevent victims from intentionally sustaining significant losses to gain more monetary compensation. It’s meant to prevent defendants from covering unreasonable outcomes, like self-inflicted injuries intended to procure larger awards. When the Victim Refuses Medical Treatment

Full Answer

What is mitigation of damages?

Are You a Lawyer? Grow Your Practice What Is Mitigation of Damages? Mitigation of damages is a contract law concept that requires that a victim in a contract dispute to minimize the damages that result from a breach of the contract.

What is the duty to mitigate in a breach of contract?

What Does Duty to Mitigate Mean? Same as above, when a person suffers damages as a result of a breach of contract, he or she has the legal obligation to minimize the effects and losses resulting from the injury. The duty to mitigate works to deny recovery of any part of damages that could have been reasonably avoided.

What happens if a victim does not mitigate damages?

If a victim does not mitigate damages, the court may refuse to award any exorbitant damages that could have been reasonably avoided by the victim. The court will evaluate the victim’s actions following the breach of contract to determine if they took steps that a reasonable person in similar circumstances would have taken to minimize their losses.

What is the defendant’s burden of proving failure to mitigate damages?

The defendant has the burden to prove that the plaintiff failed to mitigate damages and must prove that the plaintiff could have avoided extra costs and damages such as failed to receive medical attention or have surgery to avoid future injuries.

What is the mitigation of damages doctrine?

Under the mitigation of damages doctrine, a person who has suffered an injury or loss should take reasonable action, where possible, to avoid additional injury or loss.

What is mitigation of damages for provocative words?

Most states limit mitigation of damages for provocative words to a possible reduction in Punitive Damages, as opposed to Compensatory Damages. A tort victim also should act to mitigate damages subsequent to the wrongful acts of another. For instance, assume that the victim in the assault example suffers a broken leg.

What is tort lawmitigation of damages?

In Tort Lawmitigation of damages refers to conduct by the plaintiff that, although not constituting a civil wrong itself, may reduce the plaintiff's recovery. For example, if the victim of an assault used provocative words prior to the assault, the words may mitigate the plaintiff's damages. Most states limit mitigation of damages for provocative words to a possible reduction in Punitive Damages, as opposed to Compensatory Damages.

What should a tort victim do?

A tort victim also should act to mitigate damages subsequent to the wrongful acts of another. For instance, assume that the victim in the assault example suffers a broken leg. If the victim refuses to get medical treatment and the leg eventually must be amputated, the defendant may be liable only for the reasonable medical expenses to repair a broken leg. Because a reasonable person would seek medical attention after suffering a broken leg, a court could find it unreasonable to make the defendant pay for additional damage that the victim could have prevented with minimal effort.

Does the doctrine of mitigation of damages require a mitigation of damages?

The doctrine of mitigation of damagesgenerally does not require

What is Mitigation of Damages?

Mitigation of damages is a legal defense usually seen in tort or contract law. Also known as the doctrine of avoidable consequences, it’s the idea that an injured party cannot recover unreasonable expenses related to their injury when they could have avoided such expenses with reasonable effort.

What is a failure to mitigate?

One of the most common examples of mitigating damages involves medical treatment in personal injury cases. When a plaintiff refuses treatment after their injuries or fails to get medical attention altogether, it could be a “failure to mitigate” situation.

Can you get compensation for lost wages?

Many plaintiffs seek compensation for lost wages related to an accident. However, if the defendant shows that they had opportunities to find employment and work but failed to follow through, it could reduce their award. Legally, there’s a notable line between being unable to work and refusing to work.

Who has the right to request compensation for a wrongful death?

Victims have a right to request compensation from the party that harmed them.

Does mitigation of damages prevent injury?

Indeed, this concept prevents injured parties from receiving damages in situations where they could have reasonably avoided their injury or minimized the cost and impact of their injuries. However, like many aspects of tort and contract law, situations involving the mitigation of damages can become quite complicated.

What is Mitigation of Damages?

A person who claims damages as a result of an alleged wrongful act by another has a legal duty to "mitigate" those damages; that is, to take advantage of any reasonable opportunity he may have had under the circumstances to reduce or minimize the loss.

Pass the Bar, Guaranteed

BarPrepHero Premium offers the most complete collection of real bar exam questions licensed directly from NCBE (the organization that writes the exam).

What is the Duty to Mitigate Damages?

A plaintiff who proves their personal injury case may receive compensation. This compensation, called damages, includes past and future medical expenses, lost wages, and property damage, to name a few.

Who Decides Whether an Injury Victim Failed to Mitigate Damages?

An accident victim doesn’t have to take every step to avoid damages after an accident, no matter how inconvenient or expensive. They must only take reasonable precautions to prevent additional losses.

Comparative Negligence Versus the Duty to Mitigate

Sometimes, there is confusion between the doctrine of comparative negligence and the duty to mitigate. Both involve reducing the award of damages due to the plaintiff’s conduct. Comparative negligence, however, refers to when the plaintiff is partially at fault in the accident and has their damages proportionately reduced.

Contact a Tampa Personal Injury Lawyer for Help

If a person injured you due to unreasonable behavior, you can file a personal injury claim against them.

What is the burden of proof in a personal injury case?

In a personal injury case, the burden of proof is usually on the claimant to prove the elements of their case. However, when a defendant claims mitigation of damages as an affirmative defense, they assume the burden of proof.

What are the damages that victims can claim?

One aspect of damages that victims can claim is a loss of wages. If their injuries led to lost wages or even job loss, they should be compensated. However, if the victim could perform some sort of work, they need to attempt to find employment and limit the amount of lost wages. If they do not, they may have failed to mitigate their damages.

How Mitigation Works in Injury Cases

Mitigation of damages applies to breach of contract cases, real estate disputes, contract law, and personal injury cases. Also called the doctrine of avoidable consequences, mitigation of damages rules work to reduce a claimant’s final compensation if some of the claimed expenses could have been avoided.

Your Duty to Mitigate Damages

Legal rights go hand-in-hand with legal obligations. As the injured party, you have a legal obligation to limit your losses the way any reasonable person would in the same situation.

Common Ways of Failing to Mitigate Damages

Being injured in an accident doesn’t take away your patient rights. You still have the legal right and independence to make decisions about your medical care.

Mitigating Your Lost Wages

After an injury, you may not be able to return to work right away or work in the capacity that you did before the accident. Your lost wages make up a portion of your damages.

Do I Have A Duty to Mitigate Damages?

What Are Some Examples of The Mitigation of Damages?

  • Mitigating damages can take a variety of forms. It will depend on the specific facts of the accident. Some examplesinclude: 1. in a wrongful death claim after a car accident, the victim died after refusing medical care because the medical attention would have gone against his religious beliefs,4 2. a victim of medical malpractice did not go to physical therapy in order to alleviate th…
See more on shouselaw.com

How Is This Different from Contributory Negligence?

  • Mitigating damages is similar to a shared fault rule like contributory negligence. Both reduce your compensation because of something that you did. However, shared fault rules reduce your award for your negligence before the accident. You lose compensation for being partially to blame for the accident happening. Damage mitigation reduces your award for your conduct after the accid…
See more on shouselaw.com

What Compensation Am I entitled to receive?

  • In a personal injury case, you are entitled to recover all of your losses that stem from the accident. Generally, this includes things like: 1. medical bills, including reasonably anticipated expenses for future medical treatment, 2. lost wages and other income, 3. lost earning capacity, if the injury leaves you unable to work at full capacity in t...
See more on shouselaw.com

Is This Duty Confined to Personal Injury Cases?

  • No, the duty to mitigate damages is not relegated strictly to personal injury, or tort, cases. It is also a defense 1. in contract lawand 2. in some real estatecases. An example of the duty in contract law is when one party breaches the contract. The other party is not allowed to accumulate expenses and then try to recover all of them in a lawsuit for a breach of contract.7 Similarly, the …
See more on shouselaw.com

What Is Mitigation of Damages?

Image
Mitigation of damagesis a legal defense usually seen in tort or contract law. Also known as the doctrine of avoidable consequences, it’s the idea that an injured party cannot recover unreasonable expenses related to their injury when they could have avoided such expenses with reasonable effort. Indeed, this concept prevents injur…
See more on hasnerlaw.com

Understanding Duty to Mitigate Damages

  • The duty to mitigate damages is the idea that an injured party must take reasonable action to limit the extent of the harm they suffered due to a defendant. For example, in a car accident, you should pull off to the side of the road if possible to avoid being hit by another vehicle. It also applies to seeking medical attention for injuries and following medical instructions to avoid exac…
See more on hasnerlaw.com

Common Examples of Damage Mitigation

  • Since the duty to mitigate damages is a broad term, it’s sometimes easier to understand through real-life examples. Remember, it’s usually used as a defense to offset the defendant’s liability in the matter at hand.
See more on hasnerlaw.com

Proving Failure to Mitigate Damages

  • Failure to mitigate damages is a common defense. Though it won’t likely prevent the defendant from paying damages altogether, it could reduce the amount for which they are liable. However, the defendant must demonstrate that the plaintiff could reasonably have done something different.
See more on hasnerlaw.com