Advantages. Some historians have suggested that two-party systems promote centrism and encourage political parties to find common positions which appeal to wide swaths of the electorate. It can lead to political stability which leads, in turn, to economic growth.
Washington recognizes that it is natural for people to organize and operate within groups such as political parties, but he also argues that every government has recognized political parties as an enemy and has sought to repress them because of their tendency to seek more power than other groups and to take revenge on ...
Lindblom noted that political bargaining is an essential feature of polyarchy, particularly in the US. Moreover, a perceived polyarchy—such as the United States—may bar a substantial number of its citizens from participating in its electoral process.
In political science, a multi-party system is a political system in which multiple political parties across the political spectrum run for national elections, and all have the capacity to gain control of government offices, separately or in coalition.
National Union PartyAbraham Lincoln / PartyThe National Union Party was the temporary name used by the Republican Party and elements of other parties for the national ticket in the 1864 presidential election that was held during the Civil War. For the most part, state Republican parties did not change their name. Wikipedia
In his "Farewell Address," Washington offered his advice to the citizens of the United States. His key points were to warn Americans against the danger of political parties, to remain neutral in foreign conflicts and to celebrate their achievements.
government by many personsDefinition of polyarchy 1 : government by many persons : control of especially political leaders by their followers — compare hierarchy.
Polyarchy, which means “rule by many,” describes the process of democratization, in contrast to democracy itself.
Cambodia. Cambodia is an example of anocracy because its government displays democratic and authoritarian aspects.
India adopted multi-party system because India was a vast country and its social and geographical diversity would not have been absorbed easily by only two or three parties. Thus, it was best suited for India to adopt the multi-party system.
Good examples of countries that have this system include Brazil, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Mexico, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Taiwan, Philippines, and South Korea.
In other words, multi- party systems are systems in which more than two parties are represented and elected to public office. Australia, Canada, Nepal, Pakistan, India, Ireland, and Norway are examples of countries with two strong parties and additional smaller parties that have also obtained representation.