A Course in Miracles, Combined Volume, Third Edition as published by the Foundation for Inner Peace. | |
---|---|
Editor | Helen Schucman, Bill Thetford, Kenneth Wapnick |
Author | There is no author attributed to ACIM, although it was "scribed" by Helen Schucman |
Country | United States |
Subject | Spiritual transformation |
A Course in Miracles (also referred to as ACIM or the Course) is a 1976 book by Helen Schucman, a curriculum for those seeking to achieve spiritual transformation. The underlying premise is that the greatest " miracle " is the act of simply gaining a full "awareness of love's presence" in one's own life.
In August, 2017, the Circle of Atonement published "A Course in Miracles: Complete and Annotated Edition", which contains the original material that Helen Schucman wrote up to 1972, and prior to it being edited by Schucman, Thetford, and Wapnick into the Foundation for Inner Peace edition.
From 1958 through 1976, she was a professor of medical psychology at Columbia University in New York. It is claimed that A Course in Miracles was “scribed” by Schucman between 1965 and 1972 through a process of inner dictation.
It denies that sin is an act against God. The principal purpose of A Course in Miracles is to “restore to one’s awareness the power of one’s mind to choose.” There is no doubt that whatever “voice” Schucman was hearing, it was not the voice of Jesus Christ.
narrator Martin WeberThe narrator Martin Weber, [maz], is a longtime friend and member of CIMS Europe, a musician, and, of course, a student of A Course in Miracles. Maz sits with the material in meditation before he begins his recording and then adds music that he has composed for a perfect accompaniment.
A Course in Miracles is a psychological-spiritual path immersed in Love. It brings joy, peace, love, understanding of self and others, spiritual connection to the divine and your inner guidance, and spiritual & psychological wisdom.
1976A Course in Miracles / Originally published
A Course in Miracles calls such change of belief and changes of perception- from false ones to a correct one - A Miracle. “Miracles rearrange perception, and place the levels of perception in true perspective. This heals at all levels, because sickness comes from confusing the levels”
Other Christian critics say that ACIM is "intensely anti-biblical" and incompatible with Christianity, blurring the distinction between creator and created and forcefully supporting the occult and New Age worldview.
Feeding of the 5,000The first miracle, the "Feeding of the 5,000", is the only miracle—aside from the resurrection—recorded in all four gospels (Matthew 14:13–21; Mark 6:31–44; Luke 9:12–17; John 6:1–14).
A Course in Miracles consists of three separate volumes: Text, Workbook for Students and Manual for Teachers. The Text presents the theory of the Course, laying out its central ideas in a holistic, symphonic-like progression. The Workbook for Students provides 365 lessons, one for each day of the year.
The average reader will spend 22 hours and 13 minutes reading this book at 250 WPM (words per minute).
It was originally published as three books. It is a text with 31 chapters in it. It has a Workbook for Students that include 365 workbook lessons in it. It takes one year to complete.
Williamson became the "spiritual leader" for the Church of Today, a Unity Church in Warren, Michigan, where she had 2,300 congregants and 50,000 television viewers.
A miracle is generally defined, according to the etymology of the word—it comes from the Greek thaumasion and the Latin miraculum—as that which causes wonder and astonishment, being extraordinary in itself and amazing or inexplicable by normal standards.
People often buy a copy of A Course in Miracles and then have no idea where to start....How Do I “Do” It?Buy a copy of A Course in Miracles. ... Make a one-year commitment to train your mind by doing the workbook lessons. ... As for completing the rest of A Course in Miracles, find what works for you.
The words of the Course claim that they in some sense come from the individual known as Jesus of Nazareth.
No one debates this one. Ken and Gloria Wapnick express the obvious fact in their book, The Most Commonly Asked Questions About ACIM:
If Jesus can author the exact words of the Course, this implies that spirit can reach all the way down to our level, helping us very actively, specifically and personally. If Jesus cannot author a book in this way, then the opposite is implied: Spirit will not translate itself down to our level and so we will have to do what Helen supposedly did. We will have to hike ourselves up to its level and make contact with it. And then we ourselves will have to translate its abstract light into specific forms that suit our needs. This may in fact be the case, but to me this is a cold and comfortless picture. It amounts to nothing less than the idea that we have been left alone and have to get back home on our own.
The reason is simple: We as a race do not trust Helen Schucman as much as we trust Jesus Christ. You may think it should not matter to us where the Course came from, that it should carry weight based strictly on the merit of its words. Yet even so I suspect that if you truly imagine that its specific words came from Jesus, you will find yourself feeling differently about the Course. In evaluating words and ideas, we humans always consider the source.
Many believe that if Jesus has truly awakened, then he no longer exists as an entity that can act within time and space. When his body and his ego vanished, the individual character we knew as Jesus disappeared as well. Now “he” is merely a seamless part of the transcendental whole, a whole which is void of any trace of personal identity, including that of Jesus.
Now, this relationship can occur whether or not Jesus wrote the Course. Yet how much the Course itself can facilitate this relationship is affected by how directly and specifically we think he wrote it. If he wrote its words, then by simply reading those words we are contacting him, we are touching him. If he didn’t write its words then we are that much more removed from him, and will have to find some other way to bridge the gap between us and him.
A legal suit has been filed by Penguin, the new publishers of the Course, against Endeavor Academy in Wisconsin. While this suit is about copyright infringement, Endeavor is seeking to make the central issue the authorship of A Course in Miracles. It claims that since Jesus of Nazareth authored the Course, it is not copyrightable.
The point should read “A miracle reawakens the awareness that the spirit, not the body, is the altar of Truth. This is the recognition that leads to the healing power of the miracle.”
Even Ken Wapnick, who believes that Helen supplied the form of the Course, admits that Helen’s experience was different: “Helen’s experience, as we have seen, was that Jesus used her particular talents and abilities” (p. 482, italics mine). Yet this was not only Helen’s experience, it was what the words she heard claimed. And it was a specific application of the overall thought system she heard. This, then, will be our ninth conclusion:
In the common view, Bill was a scribe because it was his joining with Helen that gave birth to the Course, it was their joining that the Course specifically came to shepherd and heal, and it was their physical collaboration that brought the Course into written form–she took shorthand notes and he typed them up. In this typing he even fulfilled a literal scribal role, albeit of a secondary sort.
Jesus is telling Helen and Bill (p. 265) that they wasted a lot of time that day and that he would have liked to use the time to correct some past notes. He then says, “A major point of clarification is necessary in connection with the phrase ‘replacing hatred (or fear) with love.'” The notes then leave off and pick up later, with Jesus again speaking:
In Part I, I dealt with the role of Jesus. I settled on five conclusions which will be reviewed near the end of this article. Now, in Part II, I will turn to seven conclusions about the roles of Helen and Bill. At the end I will put all twelve conclusions together into a total picture and discuss the implications of that picture.
For instance, Helen was once told that of the two parts of a message she received, “The second part was put in by you, because you didn’t like the first ” (p. 237). There is a saving grace here, however. Jesus is apparently aware of Helen inserting her words in place of his.
In order to reach her, Jesus intentionally shaped his content into a “language” familiar to Helen. That explains why the Course uses so many of Helen’s forms (English language, Christian symbology, psychodynamics, curricular format, and Shakespearean blank verse).
A Course in Miracles is a mind training system. This differentiates it from many religions which appear to spend more time focusing on physical behaviour than inner mental practice. From the perspective of ACIM what you do in the world is irrelevant but what you do with your mind is everything.
A Course in Miracles is a thousand-page self-study guide to spiritual awakening. It includes a yearlong marathon consisting of three-hundred-and-sixty-five psychological exercises, one for each day of the year. The tome is said to have been dictated over a seven-year period in the 1960s and 70s by the spirit of Jesus Christ through a skeptical New York psychologist, Dr. Helen Schucman. Schucman was assisted in the transcribing of the dictations by her work associate, Dr. William Thetford.
Centuries later, the four Gospel writers described some 35 miracles performed by Jesus. In fact, their words suggest that he performed even more supernatural feats than those they report. Are these reports fact or fiction?b— Matthew 9:35; Luke 9:11.
The Encyclopedia of Religion explains that the founders of Buddhism, Christianity, and Islam held diverse views about miracles, but it notes: “The subsequent history of these religions demonstrates unmistakably that miracles and miracle stories have been an integral part of man’s religious life.” This reference work says that “the Buddha himself was sometimes led to work miracles.” Later, when “Buddhism was transplanted to China, its missionaries often resorted to the display of miraculous powers.”
And another irony, how people like Marianne Williamson, who became wealthy from such garbage with her own condensed version of the Course called A Return To Love, does not even follow the very spiritual tenets she so blatantly promotes. Marianne is a ‘social justice warrior’ who appears to have little problem with promoting feminism (which is based from women’s oppression) and racial politics. The irony in all of this is that how two postmodern ideas, critical theory and new thought, are actually diametrically opposed to each other but yet somehow adherents of both schools of thought have found a way to merge both of those ideas.
Ecclesiastes is attributed to Qoheleth, Son of David (9th century BCE). This has traditionally been taken to mean that the author was Solomon. The word Qoheleth is traditionally rendered as preacher, though teacher is most often used. The name Qoheleth is used eight times in the book, sometimes with the definite article which suggests that the name may be a title or epithet. Indeed, Qoheleth is depicted as a teacher and a sage rather than a king.
But Paul explained that these gifts would pass away once they were no longer needed. “Whether there are gifts of prophesying, they will be done away with; whether there are tongues, they will cease; whether there is knowledge, it will be done away with. For we have partial knowledge and we prophesy partially; but when that which is complete arrives, that which is partial will be done away with.”— 1 Corinthians 13:8-10.
It is claimed that A Course in Miracles was “scribed” by Schucman between 1965 and 1972 through a process of inner dictation.
The fundamental teaching of A Course in Miracles is the “atonement principle,” which states that separation from God through sin did not happen . The course further teaches that sin is the absence of love and nothing more. It denies that sin is an act against God. The principal purpose of A Course in Miracles is to “restore to one’s awareness ...
We students of the Course (at least most of us) believe a remarkable thing: that Jesus made inner contact with a Jewish psychologist named Helen Schucman in New York City in 1965 and dictated to her a 1,200-page book of his teachings.
[xxi] He also hopes to train his followers—via his course—to demonstrate similar abilities. Indeed, the title A Course in Miracles is meant to signify that this is a course whereby the author will teach us to do what he did. Its opening section implies this by saying, “Miracles…can heal the sick and raise the dead.” [xxii] One can almost hear the unspoken “just as I did.” Therefore, in the same way that Jesus (according to the Gospels) sent his disciples out to be healers, so the author of the Course wants his students to be the same.
Here is where the parallels between Borg’s Jesus and the Course’s Jesus get really interesting. When I first started reading Jesus scholarship, what caught my eye—because of its consonance with the Course—was the scholarly conclusion that Jesus presented himself as a teacher of wisdom, as opposed to the dying and rising God-man. Borg has developed this notion of Jesus as teacher in a way that is even more consonant with the Course. Because of the importance of this category, I will devote more attention to it than the other ones, breaking it up into several smaller sections.
Borg says that Jesus’ teaching “revolved around three great themes: an image of reality that challenged the image created by conventional wisdom; a diagnosis of the human condition [the disease]; and the proclamation of a way of transformation [the cure].” [xlv] I will treat each of these three one at a time, beginning with the first one.
According to the Course, a magical healer uses hidden powers of the mind to manipulate the physical world, while a true miracle worker allows the Holy Spirit to flow through his mind to others.
Jesus spoke of the broad way and the narrow way. The broad way—the way he spoke out against —was not the abyss of antisocial evil. Rather, it was the way of conventional wisdom. Strangely enough, what Jesus criticized was the way of decent, model citizens.
In addition to presenting himself as a spirit person (to use Borg’s term), the author is clearly training his students to be spirit persons, using, among other things, techniques of wordless meditation. He seeks to train them to experience and extend miracles, to experience holy instants (instants in which one shifts into a higher state of mind), to hear the Holy Spirit’s Voice, and to have moments of revelation (the Course’s term for mystical union).