When the effects of a prior treatment condition influences subsequent treatment conditions, a researcher is faced with this disadvantage to a within subject design. What does the 2 stand for in a 3 X 2 design?
Question 3 2 out of 2 points Barlett et al. (2005) selected a between subjects design to study the influence of action figures on male body image. Which of the following reasons listed below is not a reason why Bartlett and colleagues would have selected the design? Selected Answer: There were varying numbers of participants in the groups.
Single subject designs are more commonly known as designs. Recall the research conducted by Bartlett et al. (2005) on the influence of action figures on male body image. If Barlett exposed participants to the three conditions in the same manner and found that scores on the third condition always decreased, he might be concerned about _________.
The main disadvantage with between subjects designs is that they can be complex and often require a large number of participants to generate any useful and analyzable data. Because each participant is only measured once, researchers need to add a new group for every treatment and manipulation.
Each of these types of experimental design has its own advantages and disadvantages; within-subjects design requires fewer participants and increases the chance of discovering a true difference among your conditions; between-subjects designs minimize the learning effects across conditions, lead to shorter sessions, and ...
The key advantage of using a between-subjects design is that it is the only design that allows for the use of randomization, manipulation, and the inclusion of a comparison/control group, which are required to demonstrate cause and effect.
Between-subjects is a type of experimental design in which the subjects of an experiment are assigned to different conditions, with each subject experiencing only one of the experimental conditions. This is a common design used in psychology and other social science fields.
A major drawback of using a within-subject design is that the sheer act of having participants take part in one condition can impact the performance or behavior on all other conditions, a problem known as a carryover effect.
The word “between” means that you're comparing different conditions between groups, while the word “within” means you're comparing different conditions within the same group.
What are some advantages of within groups designs? It ensures the participants in the two groups will be equivalent (because they are the same people). Variations among participants will not effect results because their scores are only rated against themselves and not others.
For example, in a between-subjects design investigating the efficacy of three different drugs for treating depression, one group of depressed individuals would receive one of the drugs, a different group would receive another one of the drugs, and yet another group would receive the remaining drug.
between-subjects experimental design/independent measures. They MANIPULATE in the independent variable to create treatment conditions and assign DIFFERENT groups of people to each condition. The dependent variable is measured for each person and looks for differences between the groups.
in an analysis of variance, an independent variable with multiple levels, each of which is assigned to or experienced by a distinct group of participants.
Confounding from these: any characteristic of the environment that may differ
Different groups of scores all can be obtained from the same group of participants
they require a large number of people in the study because each person is only ONE score. For example, three conditions=90 people. This is a PROBLEM because if the population of study is too specific they won't get a lot of people. the primary is disadvantage of a between subjects design and why.
they can become CONFOUNDING variables. One could be higher than the other but it could also give another explanation for the difference in scores.
A major concern to the participants going through all levels of the independent variable is becoming tired of participating in the study. What disadvantage is being described here?
Farris et al. conducted a study to determine if men and women were equal in their ability to judge women's nonverbal cues. In this example, what was the IV?
Janiszewski and Uy (2008) conducted an experiment in which they had 43 participants read 10 scenarios. In this study, the researchers wanted to determine the impact of the scenario type on the anchoring and adjusting of participants. Anchoring and adjustment occurs when people use a starting point (anchor) as a basis to make judgments about a given scenario (adjustment). How many levels are there for the independent variable in this study?
Dommeyer wanted to know if the attractiveness of the researcher (attractive and not attractive) in a cover letter would influence if people responded to the mail survey. Dommeyer also wanted to know if the sex of the researcher (male or female) in the cover letter would influence if people responded to the mail survey.
Single case designs have the same disadvantages as designs.
Although there were many advantages listed in the figure, a between subjects design is not the best design for all research experiments.