Feedback: A question of policy deals with whether a specific course of action should or should not be taken.
What is the result of passive agreement? Listeners will agree that a particular policy is a good idea.
Persuasion is the process of creating, reinforcing, or changing people's beliefs or actions.
There are four basic organizational patterns for question of policy: problem-solution, problem-solution with cause, comparative advantage of solutions, and Monroe's motivated sequence.
There are four common claims that can be made: definitional, factual, policy, and value.
Factual persuasive speech is based on whether or not a particular topic is true, and is backed by concrete evidence. This type of speech persuades the audience as to whether something exists or does not exist, whether it happened or did not happen.
When planning your speech, your subject should consider attitudes, beliefs, and values altogether. During the action stage of Monroe's Motivated Sequence, you show receivers how your proposal will both benefit them and improve the situation.
Persuasive speech is a type of speech that helps convince the audience of a certain view. We tend to believe that we have a positive influence over others, but in reality, exerting influence isn't always easy. Persuasive speaking skills help us become more convincing and create a true impact when we speak.
There are three kinds of persuasive speeches most often used in the area of beliefs and attitudes. These are speeches of fact, value, and policy. You can argue about what is, what should be, or how it should be.
Monroe's (1935) motivated sequence is a commonly used speech format that is used by many people to effectively organize persuasive messages. The pattern consists of five basic stages: attention, need, satisfaction, visualization, and action. In the first stage, a speaker gets an audience's attention.
Monroe's Motivated Sequence. One of the most commonly cited and discussed organizational patterns for persuasive speeches is Alan H. Monroe's motivated sequence.
The final step in Monroe's motivated sequence is the action step, in which a speaker asks an audience to approve the speaker's proposal. For understanding purposes, we break action into two distinct parts: audience action and approval....Action.Step in the SequenceYesNoBenefits of plan relate to the audience□□23 more rows
The prosecution uses facts to convince the jury that the defendant is guilty. The defense lawyer uses facts to convince the jury that the defendant is not guilty. The way facts are presented may conflict with each other. The prosecution uses facts to convince the jury that the defendant is guilty.
The defense lawyer uses facts to convince the jury that the defendant is not guilty. The way facts are presented may conflict with each other. There is no possibility of dispute over questions of fact. The prosecution uses facts to convince the jury that the defendant is guilty.
Any movement on the scale toward the speaker's position constitutes persuasion. A listener may begin from a neutral position on the scale. A listener may end up in a neutral position on the scale. Any movement on the scale toward the speaker's position constitutes persuasion.
A listener may end up in a neutral position on the scale.
Persuasion occurs only with a radical shift along the scale toward the speaker's position.
The process of creating, reinforcing, or changing people's beliefs or actions. Persuasion. The mental give-and-take between speaker and listener during a persuasive speech. Mental Dialogue with the Audience. The portion of the whole audience that the speaker most wants to persuade. Target Audience.
Question of Value. A question about whether a specific course of action should or should not be taken. Question of Policy. A persuasive speech in which the speaker's goal is to convince the audience that a given policy is desirable without encouraging the audience ti take action in support of the policy.
T or F. An audience that is informed about a speaker's topic and holds a neutral view of the speaker's position is called a sympathetic audience.
T or F. For Monroe's Motivated Sequence to be effective in a persuasive speech, the first step is the most important one.
T or F. In a motivated sequence organization pattern, the problem is discussed in the visualization step
T or F. Questions of value ask for qualitative judgments about something's significance
T or F. A question of fact can ONLY use a "topical" or "cause and effect" pattern.
Our next step in the problem solving process is to design a method for monitoring the outcome. The method we select should assess whether the goal and action plan corrects the problem. In addition, a well-designed monitoring method will help the team to determine when the action plan needs to be improved.
Example of a goal that is not specific - "The advisory team will improve Pleasantview Dairy's profitability."
A team of professionals should not spend much time going over numerous data sets. They should have simple spreadsheets or graphs that tell how well the action plan is working and move on to bigger problems. Most teams need a short list of key parameters related to goals that they follow each meeting. An extensive list of production items is provided in the Resource/Special Tools section for ideas. Many teams track summary data from accounting reports, inventories of resources, or other items critical to monitoring action plans.
Based on the goal the action plans answers five questions - What? When? How? Where? Who?
A relevant goal is appropriate to a person who will be attempting to achieve it and to the overall goals and objectives of the farm.
Achievable goals are realistic, and well within the abilities, responsibilities and resources of the management and staff. This does not mean that goals must be easy to achieve. Every effort should be made to reach a higher level of performance.
Example of a goal that is not measurable - "Employees of Pleasantview Dairy will improve feed quality."
Factors that influence a health department’s decision whether or not to conduct a field investigation in response to one or more cases of disease include: The nature of the disease. The number of cases. Resources available. Health department’s traditional attitude toward conducting field investigations.
Common methods of identifying additional cases (expanding surveillance) as part of an outbreak investigation include: Advising the public through newspapers, TV, radio, and the health department’s website to contact the local health department.
Hypothesized exposure. Ideally, a case definition is 100% accurate in identifying who does and does not have the disease in question, but in reality few case definitions achieve this ideal. True. False. Once a case definition for an outbreak investigation has been established, it should not be changed.