Which model of criminal justice is more like an “obstacle course” than an assembly-line? a. The crime control model b. The diversion model c. The due process model d. The institutional model e. The misdemeanor model ANS: C REF: Page 23 44. Which of the following is not a primary emphasis of Packer’s crime control model of criminal justice? a.
Study sets, textbooks, questions. Log in. Sign up
· Yes, criminal justice degree is a requirement for a police officer position. It will take you about 4 years to finish the criminal justice course to become a police officer.
Start studying Criminal Justice Test #1. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. ... Which model of criminal justice is more like an "obstacle course" than an assembly-line? The due process model. The State of Michigan v. Christopher Jones provides an instance of...
If the Crime Control Model resembles an assembly line, Packer says, the Due Process Model looks very much like an obstacle course.
The due process modelThe due process model focuses on having a just and fair criminal justice system for all and a system that does not infringe upon constitutional rights. Further, this model would argue that the system should be more like an 'obstacle course,' rather than an 'assembly line.
It is easy to point to specific factors that increase or decrease crime rates. The due process model is viewed as the "obstacle course model."
The due process model prioritises the interests of the individual suspect who is confronted by the mighty power of the State. Such an individual is entitled to a presumption of innocence, and should not be found guilty of an offence other than by way of clearly defined and formal decision-making processes.
Due Process Values If the Crime Control Model resembles an assembly line, the Due Process Model looks very much like an obstacle course. Each of its successive stages is designed to present formidable impediments to carrying the accused any further along in the process. …
The crime control model reflects conservative values, while the due process model reflects liberal values. Political climate determines which model shapes criminal justice policy at a specific time. During the politically liberal 1960s, the principles and policies of due process predominated in criminal justice.
The due-process model focuses upon the rights of the defendant, who is presumed innocent until proven guilty, and aims at individualizing rehabilitation programs for those found guilty.
The conflict model of criminal justice, sometimes called the non-system perspective or system conflict theory, argues that the organizations of a criminal justice system either do, or should, work competitively to produce justice, as opposed to cooperatively.
The due process model and the crime control model both believe that the defense counsel's job is to act as an advocate within the criminal justice system. Another similarity of both models is they both believe that criminals should be punished if they violated the law.
In the crime control model, allowing investigators to use all necessary power to determine factual guilt is the goal of the legal system. The due process model makes a distinction between those who are factually guilty and those who are legally guilty (Packer, 1964).
One of the pros of the Due process is that accused gets to enjoy all Constitutional protections of law and the entire process is fair and well balanced. However the con is that it takes the time, hardship on the victims and their families in having to be at every hearing.
The Consensus Model or Systems Perspective of criminal justice argues that the organizations of a criminal justice system either do, or should, work cooperatively to produce justice, as opposed to competitively. A criminal justice model in which the majority of citizens in a society share the same values and beliefs.
In order to describe and evaluate the Canadian criminal justice system, two particular models have been developed: crime control and the due process models. By evaluating the political implications of the Charter on the criminal justice system, this essay will accomplish four objectives. First, it will describe the framework in which these models operate and explain their theoretical purpose. Secondly, it will establish the metaphor and complexities of the two models. Thirdly, it will argue for the advantages of the Due Process Model. Finally, concluding that the shift from crime control to due process, supported by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, is an improvement on Canadian criminal justice system.
Legal guilt refers to the “‘dignity enhancement’ rationale for greater procedural constraints on law enforcement” (86, Manfredi), which means the court can use various Charter provisions to protect the accused and to safeguard the credibility of the criminal process, making it more difficult to perceive legal guilt.
The exclusionary rule in Canada is listed under section 24 (2), which states that illegally gathered evidence is inadmissible if its admission would discredit the administration of justice. As we will see later, if the evidence is real and not self-incriminating and yet obtained in an illegal way, it can be admissible.
The criminal justice process should look like an obstacle course, consisting of a series of impediments that take the form of procedural safeguards that serve as much to protect the factually innocent as to convict the factually guilty.
The repression of crime should be the most important function of criminal justice because order is a necessary condition for a free society. Criminal justice should concentrate on vindicating victims' rights rather than on protecting defendants' rights.
1) The most important function of criminal justice should be to provide due process or fundamental fairness under the law e.g. PACE. 2) Criminal justice should focus on defendants right not victims rights, sometimes defendants rights are ignored and if you are wrongly convicted it can affect the rest of your life.
1) The repression of crime should be the most important function of the criminal justice system because order is a necessary condition for a free society- this ensures people are punished for the crime they commit. The benefits of this is that it acts as a deterrent, less risk to society, prevents further crime and moral panics from happening.
Crime control 'values' include the notion that that those thought to be guilty may be pursued regardless of the rules that may be in place for protecting the rights of suspects.