Integrated Emergency Management Course (IEMC) - All Hazards: Preparedness and Response Recent disasters illustrate the need to have disaster preparedness and response plans to provide continuity for a successful recovery. This addresses preparedness and response in emergency situations resulting from man-made and natural disasters.
The all hazards approach is defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as an “integrated approach to emergency preparedness planning that focuses on capacities and capabilities that are critical to preparedness for a full spectrum of emergencies or disasters.”.
Response The response phase occurs in the immediate aftermath of a disaster. During the response phase, business and other operations do not function normally. Personal safety and well- being in an emergency and the duration of the response phase depend on the level of preparedness.
All Hazards Disaster Response. The All Hazards Disaster Response (AHDR) course teaches students how to respond to the many types of disaster scenarios they may encounter, including natural disasters and infrastructure failings, fires and radiological events, pandemics, active shooter incidents, and other mass casualty events.
The goal of this course is to introduce you to the fundamentals of emergency management as an integrated system, surveying how the resources and capabilities of all functions at all levels can be networked together in all phases for all hazards including coordinating plans of the various components of the emergency management system fire and pol...
These common elements allow you to prepare for and protect yourself and your animals from disaster. Emergency managers think of disasters as recurring events with four phases: Mitigation, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery. The following diagram illustrates the relationship of the four phases of emergency management.
The response phase is a reaction to the occurrence of a catastrophic disaster or emergency. Recovery consists of those activities that continue beyond the emergency period to restore critical community functions and begin to manage stabilization efforts.
The four phases of disaster: 1) mitigation; 2) preparedness; 3) response; and 4) recovery. The model helps frame issues related to disaster preparedness as well as economic and business recovery after a disaster.
Response. The Response phase includes the mobilization of the identified emergency staff, including first responders, to an internal or external event which could have an impact on patient care operations or the campus.
5 phases of emergency managementPrevention. Prevention focuses on preventing hazards from occurring, whether they are natural, technological or caused by humans. ... Mitigation. Mitigation is the effort to reduce loss of life and property by lessening the impact of disasters and emergencies. ... Preparedness. ... Response. ... Recovery.
The mitigation phase, and indeed the whole disaster management cycle, includes the shaping of public policies and plans that either modify the causes of disasters or mitigate their effects on people, property, and infrastructure.
The three phases of a disaster program are disaster planning, disaster management and disaster recovery.
The “mitigation” phase occurs before a disaster takes place. Here, an organization will take steps to protect people and property, while also decreasing risks and consequences from a given disaster situation.
Four Phases of Disaster Managementresponse.recovery.mitigation/prevention.preparedness.
ALERT — When warning is available, there's a flurry of preparation. There may also be debate as to the reality and magnitude of the threat. (This phase can last for a few minutes to a few days, depending on circumstances. Doesn't happen at all for earthquakes and other unanticipated impacts.)
Disaster Medical Services Preparedness and Response Description. The EMS Authority, as the lead agency responsible for coordinating California's medical response to disasters, provides medical resources to local governments in support of their disaster response.
The primary aims of disaster response are rescue from immediate danger and stabilization of the physical and emotional condition of survivors. These go hand in hand with the recovery of the dead and the restoration of essential services such as water and power.
The basis of the "All Hazards" approach starts with Upstate Medical University and Hospital's Hazard Vulnerability Analysis (HVA). The HVA identifies disasters and other events from a technological, natural, man-made and hazardous materials perspective which are most likely to impact the Upstate community. These events are ranked in order of severity and greatest impact to Upstate Medical University and Hospital. A risk factor is obtained for each identified hazard by ranking probability, human impact, property impact, business impact, and overall preparedness from both internal and external response entities.
The Response phase includes the mobilization of the identified emergency staff, including first responders, to an internal or external event which could have an impact on patient care operations or the campus. Response procedures are pre-determined by the university and hospital, and are detailed in disaster plans during the Preparedness phase. Response to an internal or external incident on campus or in the hospital is directed through the Incident Command System (ICS). Response plans remain flexible in nature due to the varying members of staff available at any given time.
Mitigation is the most cost-efficient method for reducing the impact of hazards. A precursor activity to mitigation is the identification of risks. Physical risk assessment refers to the process of identifying and evaluating hazards. The higher the risk, the more urgent the need is to target hazard specific vulnerabilities through mitigation efforts. One example of mitigation at University Hospital is the 96 Hour Business Continuity Plan, which includes mitigation strategies and plans that have been developed to ensure continuity of operations in areas such as utilities, communications, food, water, medication, staffing, and medical supplies when the community is unable to support the hospital due to an external disaster scenario.
Response to an internal or external incident on campus or in the hospital is directed through the Incident Command System (ICS).
Recovery efforts are primarily concerned with actions that involve rebuilding destroyed property, re-employment, the repair of other essential infrastructure, as well as the re-opening of essential services in the hospital.
The all-hazards approach is defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as an “integrated approach to emergency preparedness planning that focuses on capacities and capabilities that are critical to preparedness for a full spectrum of emergencies or disasters.”.
To the contrary. Instead, all-hazards planning focuses on developing capacities and capabilities that matter when the going gets tough. In other words, it doesn’t zero in on every .single.threat but instead makes sure businesses have the training, supplies, and leadership to address a broad range of emergencies.
One of the most important features of any emergency planning is to make sure the business has the most modern mass communication system available. Gone are the days of walkie-talkies, phone trees, and loudspeaker announcements.
Of course, anything could happen but it’s probably more effective to assess threats that have the most potential. No matter how many situations you have to cover, the all-hazards approach is scalable enough to handle any emergency occurrence.
Ready.gov recommends taking an all-hazards approach to emergency planning since businesses face many different threats or hazards. But it’s almost impossible to determine the probability of a specific hazard. That’s why it’s important to examine various threats and hazards and the likelihood they will happen.
Emergencies aren’t fun to think about, and of course, no one wishes them on any employee or business. But planning ahead using the all-hazards approach is the most effective and scalable way to face the potentially scary and frightening events of the future.
Mitigation and Prevention seek to reduce the cycle of disaster damage and generally are intended for long-term sustained effects.
Response activities follow an emergency or disaster and are generally designed to provide emergency assistance for casualties (for example, search and rescue, emergency shelter, medical care, mass feeding). Response activities are focused on the short-term need, but also seek to reduce the probability of secondary damage resulting from ...
This is the process of identifying the personnel, training, and equipment needed for a wide range of potential incidents, and developing jurisdiction-specific plans for delivering capabilities when needed for an incident . This phase represents a continuous process involving efforts at all levels of government and between government and private-sector and nongovernmental organizations to identify threats, determine vulnerabilities, and identify resources.
The IEMC places public officials and other key community leaders in a disaster simulation. The course consists of classroom instruction and planning sessions, and exercises allow for structured decision-making in a learning environment that will simulate realistic events.
Emergency management involves participants at all governmental levels and in the private sector. Activities are geared according to phases before, during, and after emergency events. The effectiveness of emergency management rests on a network of relationships among partners in the system. This course examines specific parts ...
CEM was institutionalized with the creation of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in 1979. FEMA emerged from the consolidation of five federal agencies, each dealing separately with an aspect of large-scale emergencies. Since that time many state, local, and tribal governments have accepted CEM and changed the names ...
The concept of improving sustainability in the context of emergency management is attributable to a book, Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. The book is based on an assessment, sponsored by the National Science Foundation and others, of two decades of natural hazards research. The author, Dennis Mileti, observes that:
journal article, A Comparison of Disaster Paradigms: The Search for a Holistic Policy Guide compares Comprehensive Emergency Management (CEM) and some new “paradigms,” including the three discussed above—reducing vulnerability (disaster resistance), sustainable mitigation, and resilience. The authors of the paper also propose another approach they describe as Comprehensive Vulnerability Management (also as Invulnerable Development). (McEntire 2002)
A textbook, Introduction to Emergency Management (3rd Edition), by Haddow, Bullock, and Coppola, includes references to the four phases of emergency management and identifies them as “response, recovery, preparedness, and mitigation.” However, the idea of connecting these components in some sort of sequence is barely addressed. In fact, the authors refer to the four components as “disciplines of emergency management,” and add their own fifth “discipline.” The book has ten chapters, including:
In a closely related action in 1979 President Carter, a former Governor, created the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) with an Executive Order that combined numerous disaster-related programs from multiple federal agencies.