Characteristics of the moral point of view include ______. (Check all that apply) always acting in one's own interest considering the consequences on stakeholders situational ethical decision making sometimes acting in the best interests of others considering the consequences on stakeholders sometimes acting in the best interests of others
Elements of Moral Philosophy” by James Rachel’s: Chapter 1 Summary Morality Moral philosophy is the study of what morality means and what it requires from us. This first chapter of “Elements of Moral Philosophy” begins by attempting to define morality. This is a difficult task since so many possible and rival definitions exist.
attitudes, dispositions, or character traits that enable us to be and to act in ways that developed this potential. Virtues a moral philosophy that posits that what is moral in a given situation reflects what a well-intentioned person with a "good" moral character would deem appropriate
This preview shows page 1 - 3 out of 8 pages. Elements of Moral Philosophy” by James Rachel’s: Chapter 1 Summary Morality Moral philosophy is the study of what morality means and what it requires from us. This first chapter of “Elements of Moral Philosophy” begins by attempting to define morality.
Characteristics of the moral point of view include considering the consequences on stakeholders and sometimes acting in the best interest of others.
The philosophical view that there are no universal moral standards that are applied to all people at all times is associated with ethical relativism.
Ethical relativism is the belief that morality is relative to the norms of one's culture.
According to the Six Pillars of Character, the primary motivation for ethical action is one's inner sense of right and wrong.
The underlying attributes of ancient Greek Philosphy include excellence and happiness.
Being ethical is not the same as following the law.
Kant recognizes that it is difficult to determine one’s intentions, so he makes a distinction between acting in conformity with duty and acting from duty. To illustrate this distinction, let’s take the example of three young men who see an elderly woman needing help across the street.
An Introduction to Kant’s Moral Theory. Morally speaking, Kant is a deontologist; from the Greek, this is the science of duties. For Kant, morality is not defined by the consequences of our actions, our emotions, or an external factor. Morality is defined by duties and one’s action is moral if it is an act motivated by duty.
Duties are principles that guide our actions. Duties are imperatives in the sense that they tell us what to do. Kant recognizes that there are different types of imperatives in his distinction between a hypothetical and a categorical imperative. An imperative is essentially a ought; something I ought to do.
It is good when it acts from duty. To clarify, Kant thinks the good will is the only thing that is intrinsically valuable. If we think about the other goods and things that we value, such are not good without qualification.
However a categorical imperative does not depend upon my desires or wants. These are necessary and always binding and are the oughts that determine what our moral duties are. Even if I don’t want to help the elderly person across the street, if I have a duty to do so, my ought is binding.