Malcolm Gladwell’s book ‘ Blink ’ and Tony Buzan’s work on Mind Mapping are other good resources that can help you. Once you have come up with an appropriate number of alternative ways of achieving your task you can evaluate each in turn and choose the best course of action. I find that 3 to 5 options is optimal.
Looked at in another way, the right course of action may be so obvious that the problem no longer exists.” The ‘Which’ question relates to selection. There are generally many roads we can choose to get to our destination.
By the way, 'fairness' is a synonym for 'justice.' In order to conclude that 'Equal Justice' and 'Equal Justice Under Law' are the same, one must believe that laws are based upon concepts of fundamental fairness.... The law is the law and justice is justice. If the law is not necessarily just, how can 'Equal Justice Under Law' be just or fair?...
Sandel introduces Aristotle and his theory of justice. Aristotle disagrees with Rawls and Kant. He believes that justice is about giving people their due, what they deserve. When considering matters of distribution, Aristotle argues one must consider the goal, the end, the purpose of what is being distributed.
Justice means giving each person what he or she deserves or, in more traditional terms, giving each person his or her due. Justice and fairness are closely related terms that are often today used interchangeably.
These three theories of ethics (utilitarian ethics, deontological ethics, virtue ethics) form the foundation of normative ethics conversations.
The ethics of justice deals with moral choices through a measure of rights of the people involved and chooses the solution that seems to damage the fewest people. Rooted in a respect for the legal system, it applies in the Western democracy ideas like social contract theory to everyday moral decisions.
Four broad categories of ethical theory include deontology, utilitarianism, rights, and virtues.
Utilitarianism holds that the most ethical choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number. It is the only moral framework that can be used to justify military force or war.
Philosophers divide ethics into into three different levels, which range from the very abstract to the concrete: metaethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics. Understanding these levels is a good step toward grasping the breadth of subject.
Social justice promotes fairness and equity across many aspects of society. For example, it promotes equal economic, educational and workplace opportunities. It's also important to the safety and security of individuals and communities.
The three principles that our justice system seeks to reflect are: equality, fairness and access.
Rules that prevent smoking in residents' rooms are enforced without exception as dictated by the principle of Justice, thereby restricting individual autonomy. Therefore, Justice demands that one's right to exercise Autonomy is limited when it affects the safety and well-being of another person.
Steps to Ethical Decision MakingStep 1: Identify the problem. ... Step 2: Identify the potential issues involved. ... Step 3: Review relevant ethical guidelines. ... Step 4: Know relevant laws and regulations. ... Step 5: Obtain consultation. ... Step 6: Consider possible and probable courses of action.More items...
Ethical behavior suggests someone is honest and forthright in communications whether written or oral. A salesperson explaining potential problems with a product is being honest. A customer service representative taking responsibility for failing to follow through with a service action is making an ethical decision.
We need to be ethical because it defines who we are individually and as a society. These are norms of behavior that everyone should follow. Our society might fall into chaos if we accept that each of us could pick and choose what the right thing to do is.
Sandel introduces Aristotle and his theory of justice. Aristotle disagrees with Rawls and Kant. He believes that justice is about giving people their due, what they deserve. When considering matters of distribution, Aristotle argues one must consider the goal, the end, the purpose of what is being distributed.
Rawls argues that even meritocracy—a distributive system that rewards effort—doesn’t go far enough in leveling the playing field because those who are naturally gifted will always get ahead. Furthermore, says Rawls, the naturally gifted can’t claim much credit because their success often depends on factors as arbitrary as birth order.
View Lecture. Aristotle believes the purpose of politics is to promote and cultivate the virtue of its citizens. The telos or goal of the state and political community is the “good life”. And those citizens who contribute most to the purpose of the community are the ones who should be most rewarded.
With humorous references to Bill Gates and Michael Jordan, Sandel introduces the libertarian notion that redistributive taxation —taxing the rich to give to the poor—is akin to forced labor.
We will be looking some more at the ‘cons’ in the next section on risk. But we will start here by looking to generate various courses of action so we can then evaluate them. We need a variety of options to examine and compare so at this stage we do some brainstorming.
There are many ways to help your creativity in thinking through a problem. Edward de Bono has written some excellent books on the topic such as Lateral Thinking and Six Thinking Hats . Malcolm Gladwell’s book ‘ Blink ’ and Tony Buzan’s work on Mind Mapping are other good resources that can help you.
The time spent on this process is not wasted as the courses you don’t choose become your contingency planning. There is an army phrase that “no plan survives contact with the enemy.” In other words, there will always be unforeseen circumstances meaning you will have to adapt your ideas.
By this stage, you should have several courses of action that you could choose, Each option could achieve your aim. You will also have a feel for which option is the most attractive.
Therefore, the department, in all aspects of its operations, will place its highest priority on the protection of life.
Another way for the police executive to establish effective leadership in the realm of police-community violence is to educate the community in the expectations they should have of the department and the expectations the department has of the community.
Each police department should develop a set of policing values that reflects its own community. Fortunately, there is a general set of policing values that can serve as a framework for any department to build upon to meet local needs. Developing a set of organizational values is not difficult.
The 10 underlying principles of community policing are: Crime prevention is the responsibility of the total community. The police and the community share ownership, responsibility, and accountability for the prevention of crime.
These programs include community-oriented policing, school resource officers, police-community programs such as Midnight Basketball, and drug and gang reduction programs. While most of these contemporary programs made positive contributions to the police organization or the community, they often did not survive after outside funding stopped because they were implemented alongside what the police department was already doing and were never integrated into day-to-day operations.
The "culture" of a police department reflects what that department believes in as an organization. These beliefs are reflected in the department's recruiting and selection practices, policies and procedures, training and development, and ultimately, in the actions of its officers in law enforcement situations.
The primary purpose of this publication is to assist law enforcement agencies in reducing the incidence of violence between police officers and citizens. From the perspective of the police executive, the successful accomplishment of that objective should have two major benefits. First, it should enhance the safety of police officers. Second, it should foster an atmosphere of cooperation and mutual respect between the police and the people they serve. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a basis for assessing a police department to determine, first of all, if its culture is conducive to reducing violent confrontations between the police and citizens. Equally important, this chapter provides a frame of reference which can be used by any police chief to develop policy, make decisions, implement programs, and, ultimately guide the manner in which the department delivers police services to the community.
Solomon Asch set out to disprove the "Nuremberg Defense", i.e., that the Holocaust could be explained by people "just following orders.". When you think about a situation in terms of ethics/morals, instead of money you are in essence the situation.
Moral seduction refers to the kind of behavior an organization encourages or discourages by repeated use of examples of appropriate behavior, incentives for ethical behavior , clear rules and ethics policies, rewards for exemplary conduct, and stores of notable ethical actions. True OR False. FALSE.
The ethical action is the one that provides the greatest good for the greatest number. The second important approach to ethics has its roots in the philosophy of the 18th-century thinker Immanuel Kant and others like him, who focused on the individual's right to choose for herself or himself.
The Fairness or Justice Approach. The fairness or justice approach to ethics has its roots in the teachings of the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle , who said that "equals should be treated equally and unequals unequally.".
They enable us to pursue the ideals we have adopted. Honesty, courage, compassion, generosity, fidelity, integrity, fairness, self-control, and prudence are all examples of virtues. Virtues are like habits; that is, once acquired, they become characteristic of a person.
The common good is a notion that originated more than 2,000 years ago in the writings of Plato, Aristotle, and Cicero. More recently, contemporary ethicist John Rawls defined the common good as "certain general conditions that are...equally to everyone's advantage.".
The Utilitarian Approach. Utilitarianism was conceived in the 19th century by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill to help legislators determine which laws were morally best. Both Bentham and Mill suggested that ethical actions are those that provide the greatest balance of good over evil.