Homer Adolph Plessy was a Louisiana French-speaking Creole plaintiff in the United States Supreme Court decision in Plessy v. Ferguson. Arrested, tried and convicted in New Orleans of a violation of one of Louisiana's racial segregation laws, he appealed through Louisiana state courts to the U.S. Supreme Court and lost. The resulting "separate but equal" decision against him had wide conseq…
Full Answer
View Plessy v Ferguson (1896) from POL 111 at Des Moines Area Community College. Key Excerpts from the Majority Opinion The decision was not unanimous. Speaking for a seven-person majority, Justice
Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) Case Analysis Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896 was a landmark case that shaped the modern understanding of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution (Medley, 2012). The Fourteenth Amendment addresses equal protection and citizenship rights of all Americans. The Plessy v. Ferguson case examined whether Louisiana’s …
Question 1 of 10 10.0/ 10.0 Points What was the result of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)? A.It integrated the public school system. B.It provided for a right to privacy. C.It supported racial segregation as constitutional. D.It ended the use of sexual …
Plessy v. Ferguson. Argued April 18, 1896 Decided May 18, 1896 ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA Syllabus The statute of Louisiana, acts of 1890, c. 111, requiring railway companies carrying passengers in their coaches in that State, to provide equal, but separate, accommodations for the white and colored races, by providing two or more …
On May 18, 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson ruled that separate-but-equal facilities were constitutional. The Plessy v. Ferguson decision upheld the principle of racial segregation over the next half-century.
What was the result of Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)? It supported racial segregation as constitutional. Which term best describes "stare decisis"?
It upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal". HOPE IT HELPS.
Ferguson, (1896) U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the legality of racial segregation so long as facilities were “separate but equal.” The case involved a challenge to Louisiana laws requiring separate railcars for African Americans and whites.
Plessy had one African great grandmother. All the rest of his family was white. He looked white. When he boarded the "whites only" railroad car and handed his ticket to the conductor, Plessy had to tell the conductor that he was one eighth black.
After the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson decision, segregation became even more ensconced through a battery of Southern laws and social customs known as “Jim Crow.” Schools, theaters, restaurants, and transportation cars were segregated.
In 1896, the Supreme Court ruled in Plessy v. Ferguson that racially segregated public facilities were legal, so long as the facilities for blacks and whites were equal.
What was the basis for the Supreme Court's decision in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) that upheld the constitutionality of a state law requiring segregated railroad facilities? The Constitution does not prohibit segregation; it only mandates equal protection under the law.
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. The case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for Black people.
On June 7, 1892, Plessy bought a ticket on a train from New Orleans bound for Covington, Louisiana, and took a vacant seat in a whites-only car. After refusing to leave the car at the conductor’s insistence, he was arrested and jailed. Convicted by a New Orleans court of violating the 1890 law, Plessy filed a petition against the presiding judge, ...
After the Compromise of 1877 led to the withdrawal of federal troops from the South, Democrats consolidated control of state legislatures throughout the region, effectively marking the end of Reconstruction.
In declaring separate-but-equal facilities constitutional on intrastate railroads, the Court ruled that the protections of 14th Amendment applied only to political and civil rights (like voting and jury service), not “social rights” (sitting in the railroad car of your choice).