Instituted in the hope of avoiding war, appeasement was the name given to Britain's policy in the 1930s of allowing Hitler to expand German territory unchecked. Most closely associated with British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, it is now widely discredited as a policy of weakness.
appeasement, Foreign policy of pacifying an aggrieved country through negotiation in order to prevent war. The prime example is Britain's policy toward Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany in the 1930s.
Appeasement was the policy of making concessions to the dictatorial powers to avoid conflict. This policy was followed by the British and the French to prevent wars with aggressive powers like Germany and Italy.
Appeasement allowed Hitler to believe that he could get away with anything, encouraging Hitler to take the risks that led to World War Two. The policy was seen as cowardly by many in the 1940s, reflecting the idea that Hitler 'reacted' to the actions of Chamberlain being cowardly, rather than him being an aggressor.
noun. the policy of acceding to the demands of a potentially hostile nation in the hope of maintaining peace. the act of appeasing.
Appeasement. Appeasement is the act of giving into aggressive demands in order to maintain peace. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain used appeasement to give into Hitler's demands of taking over Czechoslovakia in exchange for peace at the Munich Conference.
Appeasement was initially popular because: people wished to avoid conflict - memories of the Great War and its suffering were still present. Britain in the 1930s was struggling with the impact of the Depression, and so the country could not afford another war and heavy rearmament.
In the late 1930s Britain, under Neville Chamberlain, and her ally France adopted a policy of appeasement. This meant that they wanted to keep the peace and avoid entering a war at any cost, even if it meant making concessions towards potential aggressors, particularly Germany ruled by the dictator Adolf Hitler.
What was the result of appeasement? Appeasement reached its climax in September 1938 with the Munich Agreement. Chamberlain hoped to avoid a war over Czechoslovakia by conceding to Adolf Hitler's demands. The Agreement allowed Nazi Germany to annex the Sudetenland, the German-speaking parts of Czechoslovakia.
In March 1939, when Germany seized the remainder of Czechoslovakia, it was clear that appeasement had failed. Chamberlain now promised British support to Poland in the case of German aggression. A misguided belief in 'peace in our time' was replaced by a reluctant acceptance of the inevitability of war.
It came to an end when Hitler seized Czechoslovakia on March 15, 1939, in defiance of his promises given at Munich, and Prime Minister Chamberlain, who had championed appeasement before, decided on a policy of resistance to further German aggression.
An example of appeasement is the infamous 1938 Munich Agreement, in which Great Britain sought to avoid war with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy by taking no action to prevent Italy's invasion of Ethiopia in 1935 or Germany's annexation of Austria in 1938.
An example of appeasement is the infamous 1938 Munich Agreement, in which Great Britain sought to avoid war with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy by taking no action to prevent Italy's invasion of Ethiopia in 1935 or Germany's annexation of Austria in 1938.
The policy of Appeasement was the diplomatic policy of making a concession to the enemy country in order to avoid war. It was a policy followed by Britain and France during 1935–39. This policy allowed Hitler to violate terms of the treaty of Versailles so that he would not do anything worse.
The Policy of Appeasement eventually became recognized as short term fix when it was made clear that the Policy would not stop Hitler and war was inevitable. However, Britain and France failed to intervene when Hitler's grievances stretched much further than the original legitimate plans.
We believe that appeasement was a mistake. The reason we think this is because, if Britain and France were to act earlier the second world war could have been prevented. We also think this because appeasement meant that Hitler gained, land, power and confidence.
Perhaps the best-known example of appeasement took place on September 30, 1938, when leaders of Great Britain, France, and Italy signed the Munich Agreement allowing Nazi Germany to annex the German-speaking Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia.
Finally, appeasement is often viewed as an act of cowardice by the public and taken as a sign of military weakness by the aggressor nation. While some historians condemned appeasement for allowing Hitler's Germany ...
Appeasement is the diplomatic tactic of offering concessions to aggressor nations in an attempt to avoid or delay war. Appeasement is most often associated with Great Britain’s failed attempt to prevent war with Germany by offering concessions to Adolph Hitler. While appeasement has the potential to prevent further conflict, ...
Appeasement is the foreign policy tactic of offering specific concessions to an aggressor nation in order to prevent war. An example of appeasement is the infamous 1938 Munich Agreement, in which Great Britain sought to avoid war with Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy by taking no action to prevent Italy’s invasion of Ethiopia in 1935 ...
The delays of the appeasement are thought to be at least partially to blame for allowing pre-World War II atrocities such as the 1937 Rape of Nanking and the Holocaust. In retrospect, the lack of resistance from the appeasing nations enabled the rapid growth of Germany’s military machine.
Signed on July 14, 2015, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is an agreement between Iran and the permanent members of the United Nations Security Council—China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, the United States, Germany, and the European Union—intended to deal with Iran’s nuclear development program.
The U.S. reminded both nations of their obligation under the 1929 Kellogg–Briand Pact to settle their differences peacefully. Japan, however, rejected all offers of appeasement and went on to invade and occupy the whole of Manchuria.
Appeasement is most often used to describe the response of British policy makers to the rise of Nazi Germany in the 1930s. It is seen as a policy of one-sided concessions to an aggressor state, often at the expense of third parties, with nothing offered in return except promises of better behaviour in the future.
By May 1940, the Allies were losing, and on 10 May 1940, Hitler invaded Holland, Belgium, and the Netherlands.
Chamberlain promised it would bring “peace in our time”, but Churchill scolded him for “throwing a small state to the wolves” in exchange for a promise of peace.
The commonly accepted version of events states that Lord Halifax, Chamberlain’s original choice of successor, turned down the post of Prime Minister because he believed he could not govern effectively as a member of the House of Lords instead of the House of Commons.
By this time, Churchill had become an increasingly marginalised voice and he was side-lined by Neville Chamberlain. Winston Churchill was the most well-known opponent of appeasement, and consistently warned the government of the dangers posed by Nazi Germany, though his warnings went unheeded.
Following the Nazis’ rise to power in 1933, Winston Churchill warned of the perils of German nationalism. But the British government ignored him and did all it could to stay out of Adolf Hitler ’s way. The nation was weary of war and reluctant to get involved in international affairs again so soon.
In the above ways, appeasement can be said to have caused World War II. It allowed Hitler to build his military power and made him so bold that he believed he could get away with any kind of aggression he wished. Hitler's aggression and military power allowed him to start World War II.
Appeasement helped cause World War II by encouraging Adolf Hitler's aggression in Europe in the years before World War II (1939–1945) . Appeasement is most closely associated with the policies of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. Hitler came to power in 1933, determined to overthrow the Versailles Treaty and restore Germany to its dominant position in Europe. For the next six years, he challenged the Anglo-French in a variety of ways.
If the French and British had not appeased Hitler, he would not have been able to build the German war machine. The Treaty of Versailles prohibited Germany from having a strong military. In 1935, Hitler renounced the treaty and started to rearm Germany with no regard for what the treaty said. If the French and British had stood up to Hitler at that time, he would not have been able to continue to rearm. The Treaty of Versailles said Germany could not have military troops or installations in a region of Germany called the Rhineland. In 1936, Hitler put troops in that area. Again, if the French and British had resisted, Hitler would have lost his ability to build his military power.
Germany rearmed after Hitler took power in 1933. Hitler ignored the strict limits that the Versailles Treaty had put on Germany's armed forces. In 1936, Hitler sent troops into the Rhineland. Although it was part of Germany, Berlin was not permitted to station troops there. But London and Paris allowed it.
Who are the experts? Our certified Educators are real professors, teachers, and scholars who use their academic expertise to tackle your toughest questions. Educators go through a rigorous application process, and every answer they submit is reviewed by our in-house editorial team.
In 1938, Germany was allowed to annex Austria. This had been expressly forbidden by the treaties that ended World War II.
People didn’t yet understand the magnitude of Hitler’s plans for all of Europe and they feared the start of another world war. Thus, appeasement was seen as the only option that could keep the peace. If only the Allies had known what was coming…
Appeasement was said to have been beneficial because it provided the Allies with more time to prepare for war. However, the idea that the Munich Agreement had restored peace fooled the Allies into a stagnant state since none of them were fully prepared for the war when it arrived.
The annexation of new lands by Germany also contributed to the increase in German strength. For example, the Rhineland provided Germany with stronger defense of its borders and Austria provided Germany with gold, weapons, soldiers, and deposits of iron ore (which resulted in the increased production of munitions). All of these things that increased Germany’s strength were made possible by the policy of appeasement and contributed to the enormous scale of destruction in WWII when Germany clashed with the Allied powers.
Hitler and Neville Chamberlain at the Munich Conference. Furthermore, I think that appeasement was a mistake since it allowed Germany to make agreements with other countries (which Germany was NOT allowed to do according to the Treaty of Versailles), increasing German confidence in its military dominance.
See this is the tricky part. All the stuff I’ve said above leaves out the fact that the Allied leaders were under a lot of pressure and they had very few options to get them out of a sticky situation. Plus, they were doing all they could to avoid another war like WWI.
Neville Chamberlain, Prime Minister of Britain at the time of appeasement.
Even if the Allied leaders themselves had decided earlier on that military action was necessary, it is quite likely that they wouldn’t have had enough volunteers to sustain a proper military campaign. The citizens of Allied nations mainly supported the policy of appeasement and were not willing to go to war over small, new, foreign lands that they had never heard of before in their lives. Furthermore, at that time many people didn’t see Hitler as a threat and very few outside of Germany knew what he was really planning (despite the fact that he had outlined many of his ideas in Mein Kampf).