The name used by Aristotle for the logical appeal of a speaker. The two major elements of logos are evidence and reasoning. A fallacy which assumes that because something is popular, it is therefore good, correct, or desirable. What many teachers refer to as source credibility was called ethos by Aristotle.
Which of the following best describes analogical reasoning? An argument that compares similar cases and infers that what is true for the first case is also true for the second.
Ten fallacies of reasoning discussed in this chapter are hasty generalization, false analogy, false cause, false authority, false dilemma, ad hominem, slippery slope, red herring, and appeal to tradition.
What error in reasoning is exemplified in the following statement? I usually eat spaghetti for dinner the day before an exam, but I ran out of spaghetti the night before the calculus final. That's why I got a C. The fallacy of false cause is often known by its Latin name, post hoc, ergo propter hoc.
Analogical reasoning is any type of thinking that relies upon an analogy. An analogical argument is an explicit representation of a form of analogical reasoning that cites accepted similarities between two systems to support the conclusion that some further similarity exists.
Analogical reasoning is a kind of reasoning that is based on finding a common relational system between two situations, exemplars, or domains. When such a common system can be found, then what is known about one situation can be used to infer new information about the other.
7 types of reasoningDeductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is a type of reasoning that uses formal logic and observations to prove a theory or hypothesis. ... Inductive reasoning. ... Analogical reasoning. ... Abductive reasoning. ... Cause-and-effect reasoning. ... Critical thinking. ... Decompositional reasoning.
Fallacies are common errors in reasoning that will undermine the logic of your argument. Fallacies can be either illegitimate arguments or irrelevant points, and are often identified because they lack evidence that supports their claim.
Why is analogical reasoning frequently used in persuasive speeches on questions of policy? Analogical reasoning compares two similar cases to draw the conclusion that what is true in once case will also be true in the other. When arguing for a new policy, you should find out whether it has been tried elsewhere.
90 Cards in this SetOrganizing the message, choosing words, and sentence structures, and verbalizing the message is termed encodingTrueThe__ speech purpose expresses exactly what the speaker wishes the audience to get from the speechspecific88 more rows
Which of the following are reasons to use the conclusion to reinforce your speech's central idea? It will make the last impression forceful and favorable. It will strengthen the audience's commitment to the central idea.
How can we take my opponent's proposed education bill seriously? After all, he flunked out of high school. Feedback: Because this statement attacks the speaker's opponent personally, rather than dealing with the merits of his or her education bill, it commits the ad hominem fallacy.