Which of the following is the most appropriate step to take if authors believe that their manuscript was reviewed unfairly? The author can contact the editor with their concerns.
CITI- Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Flashcards | Quizlet.
Which of the following is most likely to help the journal publication process mitigate reproducibility problems? Moving away from a review process that favors the publication of positive results.
Which of the following is true regarding the traditional peer review process: Under single-blind review, the identity of the author is revealed to the reviewer. A reviewer's main responsibility is to: Behave professionally.
The inquiry is generally the first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation.
It is a system's inertia or resistance to change. Michael McFarland argues that proximity is one reason why researchers have an obligation to help the public. Which of following most accurately describes what McFarland means by proximity? Having the specialized expertise to reduce technical risks.
What is the most appropriate process for research collaborators to use in determining which journal they should submit their work to? The research team should discuss the issue early on and while the project is ongoing.
Which of the following would be appropriate during the process of acquiring excess blastocysts (embryos) for research purposes? IRB review is required any time established human embryonic stem cell (hESC) lines are used in research.
Which of the following is the primary criterion for authorship? Having made a significant intellectual contribution to the work.
Answer Explanation The correct answer for the given question is C) Under single-blind review, the identity of the author is revealed to the reviewer. The traditional method of peer review is single or double blind.
Peer review is an important tool in social work education because it promotes self- examination, assessment, interpersonal interaction, and verbal and written communication—fundamental skills necessary for professional social work practice (Lemieux, 2001).
What does a reviewer do during peer review? He reviews the paper looking for errors and makes sure the paper meets standards set down by the scientific community.
Other people will always bring an alternative view of a problem. So, I would recommend involving at least one other person in the thinking . Even if they just act as a sounding board of your ideas it will bring diversity to your thinking.
In other words, there will always be unforeseen circumstances meaning you will have to adapt your ideas. Having looked at alternatives in the planning process you will find it much easier and quicker to adapt your plan and move on when you face obstacles. Therefore it is more about the planning than the plan itself.