The information citizens rely on to elect their government officials generally comes from the media, such as television, radio, newspapers and the Internet. Citizens share their opinions with their elected officials through various ways, including letter writing.
Use the media and other public channels to spread your criticism to your intended audience. Keep at it for as long as is necessary - indefinitely, if need be. Bolder Advocacy has information on both praising and criticizing elected officials on their actions with regard to advocacy.
Thus, calling attention to the potential for harm if a particular action were to be taken is often the best way to stop it from being taken.
Criticizing unfavorable action is protesting - usually publicly - action that you believe is unwise, unfair, ineffective or contrary to the public interest. Both your criticism and the actions you might criticize can take a number of different forms. Bringing your criticism directly to those who are responsible - policy makers, CEO's, etc.
As such, governors are responsible for implementing state laws and overseeing the operation of the state executive branch. As state leaders, governors advance and pursue new and revised policies and programs using a variety of tools, among them executive orders, executive budgets, and legislative proposals and vetoes.
Act: Legislation that has passed both houses of Congress and has been either approved by the President, or has passed Congress over his veto, thus becoming law.
The Constitution explicitly assigns the president the power to sign or veto legislation, command the armed forces, ask for the written opinion of their Cabinet, convene or adjourn Congress, grant reprieves and pardons, and receive ambassadors.
The Line Item Veto? The Line Item Veto Act, P.L. 104-130, allowed the President, within five days (excluding Sundays) after signing a bill, to cancel in whole three types of revenue provisions within the bill. The cancellation would take effect upon receipt by Congress of a special message from the President.
An Act of Parliament creates a new law or changes an existing law. An Act is a Bill that has been approved by both the House of Commons and the House of Lords and been given Royal Assent by the Monarch.
Resolution – Legislation introduced in either the House of Representatives or the Senate, but unlike bills they may be limited in effect to the Congress or one of its chambers. The three types of resolutions are joint resolutions, simple resolutions and concurrent resolutions.
In the case of presidential impeachment trials, the chief justice of the United States presides. The Constitution requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate to convict, and the penalty for an impeached official upon conviction is removal from office.
The President can draw on three sources to issue an executive action (an executive action is an executive order or memorandum). The first is the Constitution itself. Article II vests the executive power in the President, which gives him the power to oversee and direct the various aspects of the executive branch.
making a treaty. Which statement best explains why the Constitution limits the power of the executive branch? The Constitution limits the executive branch to keep the president from becoming too powerful.
(2) The President shall have the power to veto any particular item or items in an appropriation, revenue, or tariff bill, but the veto shall not affect the item or items to which he does not object.
However, the United States Supreme Court ultimately held that the Line Item Veto Act was unconstitutional because it gave the President the power to rescind a portion of a bill as opposed to an entire bill, as he is authorized to do by article I, section 7 of the Constitution.
Which of the following actions were used by states to challenge the legitimacy of the federal government in the antebellum period? Arguments that justified secession as permissible under the Constitution.
Citizens share their opinions with their elected officials through various ways, including letter writing. Special interest groups center on subsets of people with common interests and attitudes who try to influence government to share their philosophy.
Citizens can influence what the United States government does through four channels: political parties, campaigns and elections, interest groups and the media.
Party members are directly elected by the citizens. Campaigns and elections, which can be lavish, expensive affairs, afford people the opportunity to hear from party representatives regarding issues and a candidate's qualifications for office. The information citizens rely on to elect their government officials generally comes from the media, ...
All because we let our guard down and allowed people like the Rockefellers, Carnegies, Rothschilds, Harry Hopkins, Acheson, members of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA), and George Catlett Marshall have any control.
Obviously, deep in the bowels of our government, many Communists and commie sympathizers were working night and day to both sabotage the West’s efforts in the war to keep the Russians as far away as possible from Western Europe, and to keep the citizens in the dark about the machinations going on to cancel us. With their singlemindedness, they were corrupting our entire government with their actions, and destroying the integrity of our once great nation.
Roosevelt was (falsely) advised by the Joint Chiefs of Staff that “we had a long, hard row to hoe with the Japanese and that without Russia’s help we might not achieve victory”. The Japanese were already out peace feelers, but this fact was kept from Roosevelt.
Politically, any orientation which the Chinese Communists may once have had toward the Soviet Union seems to be a thing of the past. The Communists have worked to make their thinking and program realistically Chinese, and they are carrying out democratic policies which they expect the United States to approve and sympathetically support. [11]
The one area I want address here is China. China was a great ally of the United States and the U.S. was, supposedly, working with China to keep the USSR from taking over Asia. Roosevelt thought and said so. But those working for him had other plans for China .
The project was not disguised. It was a nakedly imperialistic aggression over the prostrate body of China. What Roosevelt sealed and delivered in the protocol agreed upon by him and Stalin in a secret parley consuming only eleven minutes, and thereafter kept locked away in White House safe for many months, were the historic levers of power over China. . ..[7]
Under no circumstances should we pay the Soviet Union to destroy China. Theis would certainly injure the material and moral position of the United States in Asia.[3]
So their private corporate “law” was challenged by people owed the Public Law — that is, by people acting in their unincorporated capacity– and the rats had to admit the supremacy of the Public Law and had to release all these purported “felons” who were never their employees or dependents and who were never subject to their “private” corporate “law” in the first place.
The Rest of the Liability Story. By Anna Von Reitz. If you have no responsibility for your actions in commerce (that is, if you accept no liability), you have no right to conduct commerce. Remember that little factoid as we go along.
This is known as Dual Citizenship, where one person owes citizenship obligations to two (2) body politics and two governments at the same time. Americans are either (1) State Nationals, or (2) State Citizens, one or the other, no wishy-washy. We don't recognize Dual Citizenship at all.
If you accept a “Second” Declaration of Independence, you cause a break between you and the original Declaration of Independence, and as a result, you lose all that your Forefathers won — - your land, your soil, your independence, your sovereignty, your Natural Unalienable Rights— all tossed away by your own hands.
If a defendant is served with a complaint, he may dodge the lawsuit by filing motions to avoid filing an Answer!
being treated as "persons" because you aren't standing up and declaring your. allegiance to your lawful state of the Union and you aren't filling your vacated public. offices and running your own American Common Law Courts. Mulligan Ex Parte very clearly states that wherever our American Common Law.
Our American Federal Republic ceased operating in 1860, as a result of its oversight and funding being disrupted by the Secession of the Southern State-of -State Governments from the original Confederation.