Jun 12, 2017 · Response Feedback: Good work Question 18 2 out of 2 points What is a criticism of the attitudinal model of justice behavior? Selected Answer: Only one justice writes the majority decision so it's hard to tell why the other justices voted the way they did. Correct Answer: Only one justice writes the majority decision so it's hard to tell why the other justices voted the way …
Jun 12, 2017 · Response Feedback: That's not correct Question 25 2 out of 2 points What is a criticism of the attitudinal model of justice behavior? Selected Answer: Only one justice writes the majority decision so it's hard to tell why the other justices voted the way they did. Correct Answer: Only one justice writes the majority decision so it's hard to tell why the other justices …
Response Feedback: Good work What is a criticism of the attitudinal model of justice behavior? Selected Answer: Only one justice writes the majority decision so it's hard to tell why the other justices voted the way they did. Correct Answer: Only one justice writes the majority decision so it's hard to tell why the other justices voted the way they did.
Response Feedback: Good work Question 8 What is a criticism of the attitudinal model of justice behavior? Response Feedback: Good work Question 9 If a case contained all three cues, what is the percentage that a certiorari would be granted? Response Feedback: Good work
While the combination of the decision-maker's preferences and the facts undoubtedly help to predict the outcome of the case, the model is criticized because the degree to which the final decision will depend on the personal preferences is unknown and varies from case to case.
SCOTUS chief justices choose the court docket whereas state chief justices have to confer with their co-justices. Which cue would make a case most likely to be heard by the Supreme Court? Time spent in the lower courts.
There is, however, a major difference between the two. The Supreme Court is a national court operating in a country with a written constitution, whereas the ECJ is a transnational court operating in a legal context that lacks a functioning written constitution equivalent to the U.S. Constitution.Oct 1, 2006
Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case. Stare decisis ensures that cases with similar scenarios and facts are approached in the same way. Simply put, it binds courts to follow legal precedents set by previous decisions.
The Court is likely to deny review if the lower court also ruled against the party on an alternative ground, if there is doubt about the Court's jurisdiction to decide the question, or if the Court would have to resolve some other difficult factual or legal question in order to decide the question presented.
Typically, the Court hears cases that have been decided in either an appropriate U.S. Court of Appeals or the highest Court in a given state (if the state court decided a Constitutional issue). The Supreme Court has its own set of rules. According to these rules, four of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case.
First, the UK courts, including the Supreme Court, are not bound by decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union made after 11pm on 31 December 2020. The UK courts, including the Supreme Court, may have regard to the Luxembourg Court's decisions if relevant, but they are not generally obliged to follow them.
Constitutional courts were created by the constitution, have the power of judicial review, and have judges with life terms. Legislative courts serve a specific rather than general purpose, cannot exercise judicial review powers, and their judges have fixed terms.
What is the difference between the European Union (EU) and the euro zone? The European Union consists of those countries that meet certain membership and accession criteria, and the euro zone is a subset of those countries using the euro as their national currency.
The advantage of the doctrine of precedent is that it provides certainty and predictability. The disadvantage, however, is that stare decisis can result in a lack of flexibility and an inability of the common law to adapt to changing moral, socio- economic, and political realities resulting in a static body of law.
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania, et al. v. Robert P. Casey, et al. A Pennsylvania law that required spousal awareness prior to obtaining an abortion was invalid under the Fourteenth Amendment because it created an undue burden on married women seeking an abortion.
No. Judges adhere to stare decisis until they decide to break with precedent, and then make up some irrevocably changed circumstances or claim to have discovered new information in order to justify their decision. There are no actual rules for when a Court can overcome stare decisis.Dec 20, 2021
35. Brad, a retail store manager, notices that one of his employees, Eric , is sleeping in the break room during his shift. Brad needs to give Eric feedback that this conduct is not allowed. You advise Brad that the feedback would be best delivered to Eric:
One reason that training is important to organizations is that such programs can lead to: A) an increase in the cognitive ability of the workforce. B) increased organizational commitment. C) an increase in the situational specificity of the training programs. D) an increase in counterproductive behavior.
Explain the difference between act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. Rule utilitarianism draws up general rules based on the utlity princciple. Rule utilitarianism says that as long as an action conforms to a rule that leads to the greatest good, then it is moral. Based on past experience.
The Paradox of Hedonisim is the idea that the more you pursue happiness the more it will elude you. Those who seek only happiness and fixate on aquiring it, are bound to be dissapointed. If you look for pleasure , chances are you won't find it. Pleasure will come to you when you are not looking for it.
Descriptive ethics aims to describe peoples beliefs, claims and behaviors. Normative ethics uses judgement and attempts to evaluation if actions and things are in fact good or bad, and what it takes in fact to be a good or bad person.
Hypothetical imperatives are decisions that depend on the situation and one's own desires. If someone decides on a maxim, like the store owner saying, "I will not steal from my customers, because I will lose them.". She is deciding depending on the situation what the smart thing would be.
The harm principle states that the only actions that can be prevented are ones that create harm. In other words, a person can do whatever he wants as long as his actions do not harm others. Says that you should not interfere with the lives of others, the exception being if they are bringing harm to others.
Induction is the idea that you can take past experiences and use those to draw a conclusion about what will happen in the future. How do past experiences give us any reason to believe that future experiences will be the same.
Negative rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. John Locke and Thomas Jefferson are two people who advocated for them. Right to life could be misconstrued as the anti-abortion movement view. Also according to this theory, right to life means you have the right to not have your life be interfered with.