what does it mean for an argument to be cogent? (points : 1) course hero

A sound argument is a valid argument that has true premises. A cogent argument is a strong non-deductive argument that has true premises.... And we defined an argument as being strong if it's a non-deductive argument in which the premises succeed in providing strong support for the conclusion.

Full Answer

What is an example of cogent argument?

A cogent argument is one that the truth of its premise makes the conclusion more likely to be true than false. Example: 1. Most birds can fly. What makes an argument strong and cogent? A cogent argument is by definition non-deductive, which means that the premises are intended to establish probable (but not conclusive) support for the conclusion.

What is the difference between cogent and weak inductive arguments?

The premises in strong inductive arguments prove that the conclusion is probably true, whereas the premises in weak inductive arguments do not prove the conclusion is probably true. So cogent arguments are a) strong inductive arguments and b) all the premises are actually What are some examples of a cogent argument?

What are the similarities between sound and cogent arguments?

A sound argument is a deductive argument. A cogent argument is an inductive argument. A SOUND argument is a valid deductive argument with true premises. So, the similarities are that both sound and cogent arguments have true premises. Both soundness and cogency are concerned with truth.

How do you know if an argument is strong?

An inductive argument (as opposed to a deductive argument) is said to be strong if it can be logically demonstrated that, assuming the truth of every premise, the conclusion is probably true. That is to say, if we affirm all the premises but deny the conclusion, then we probably contradict ourselves.

What is a good argument?

When is an argument deductively valid?

What is an inductive argument?

Is an argument circular or deductive?

Is the strong argument necessarily true?

Is a valid argument a conclusion?

See 3 more

About this website

What makes an argument cogent?

To say an argument is cogent is to say it is good, believable; there is good evidence that the conclusion is true. A weak argument cannot be cogent, nor can a strong one with a false premise(s). The concept of true premises sometimes bothers people.

What does it mean for an inductive argument to be cogent Phi 103?

Cogent argument. a strong argument in which all premises are true.

What is an example of a cogent argument?

A cogent argument is one that the truth of its premise makes the conclusion more likely to be true than false. Example: 1. Most birds can fly.

What is the difference between sound and cogent argument?

A sound argument is a deductive argument that is both valid and all of its premises are true. An unsound argument is a deductive argument that is either invalid or has at least one false premise. A cogent argument is an inductive argument that is both strong and all of its premises are true.

What makes an inductive argument cogent quizlet?

Cogent Argument. A strong inductive argument in which ALL the premises are actually true. Uncogent Argument. A strong inductive argument in which EVEN ONE premises is actually false.

How do you know if an inductive argument is strong or weak?

An inductive argument is strong when, assuming the premises are true, it is improbable for the conclusion to be false. An inductive argument is weak when, assuming the premises are true, it is probable for the conclusion to be false. A further evaluation involves the actual truth of the premises.

What is a inductive argument quizlet?

Definition. 1 / 10. A deductive argument sets out to guarantee the truth of its conclusion based on the truth of its premises while an inductive argument attempts to offer a probability that its conclusion is true based on the truth of its premises.

What is the difference between strong arguments and cogent arguments?

Cogent arguments are just strong arguments with all true premises. Strong arguments are just arguments whose inference between the premises and conclusion is considered more probable than not. Be careful to keep this in mind, cogent arguments, unlike sound arguments, can have a false conclusion!

PHIL 1180 Chapter 3 Flashcards | Quizlet

True or False- Basic Concepts Learn with flashcards, games, and more — for free.

Cogent Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster

cogent: [adjective] appealing forcibly to the mind or reason : convincing. pertinent, relevant.

Writer's Web: Reasoning: Arguing Cogently - University of Richmond

Reasoning: Arguing Cogently By David Roberts (printable version here)Academic writing requires writers to make claims and support them using evidence of one kind or another.

Uncogent - Everything2.com

In logic, the term describing an inductive argument that meets one of the following criteria: . The argument is weak, but the premises and conclusion are true. For example: All men have lungs. Therefore, probably most men stand upright. The argument is weak, and the premises are true, but the conclusion is false. For example: All men have lungs. Therefore, probably all men breathe metha

Google Docs

Create and edit web-based documents, spreadsheets, and presentations. Store documents online and access them from any computer.

What is a good argument?

It is basically a type of argument in which good reasons and logics are provided by the premises to accept the conclusion.

When is an argument deductively valid?

An argument is deductively valid if it is not possible for the conclusion to be false if all the premises are true. In other words, truth of the premises guarantees truth of the conclusion.

What is an inductive argument?

Inductive arguments are arguments where the premises are meant/supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. inductive arguments are different from other types of arguments as these are not valid or invalid but weak or strong. The premises in strong inductive arguments prove that the conclusion is probably true, whereas the premises in weak inductive arguments do not prove the conclusion is probably true. So cogent arguments are a) strong inductive arguments and b) all the premises are actually true.

Is an argument circular or deductive?

If the argument is deductive (a linear chain of reasoning), the argument must not be circular. In other words, the reasons for accepting the premises must not be evidentially based on the conclusion.

Is the strong argument necessarily true?

So we see that neither the valid argument nor the strong argument are necessarily true ( and the strong argument isn’t shooting for that, necessarily). The truth or strength of their conclusions depend on the truth of the premises.

Is a valid argument a conclusion?

The point is, a valid argument doesn’t actually mean the conclusion is true, just that it logically follows from the premises. If the premises are false (“All elephants can fly”), then you are left with a perfectly valid argument that is completely false.

What is a good argument?

It is basically a type of argument in which good reasons and logics are provided by the premises to accept the conclusion.

When is an argument deductively valid?

An argument is deductively valid if it is not possible for the conclusion to be false if all the premises are true. In other words, truth of the premises guarantees truth of the conclusion.

What is an inductive argument?

Inductive arguments are arguments where the premises are meant/supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. inductive arguments are different from other types of arguments as these are not valid or invalid but weak or strong. The premises in strong inductive arguments prove that the conclusion is probably true, whereas the premises in weak inductive arguments do not prove the conclusion is probably true. So cogent arguments are a) strong inductive arguments and b) all the premises are actually true.

Is an argument circular or deductive?

If the argument is deductive (a linear chain of reasoning), the argument must not be circular. In other words, the reasons for accepting the premises must not be evidentially based on the conclusion.

Is the strong argument necessarily true?

So we see that neither the valid argument nor the strong argument are necessarily true ( and the strong argument isn’t shooting for that, necessarily). The truth or strength of their conclusions depend on the truth of the premises.

Is a valid argument a conclusion?

The point is, a valid argument doesn’t actually mean the conclusion is true, just that it logically follows from the premises. If the premises are false (“All elephants can fly”), then you are left with a perfectly valid argument that is completely false.