Aside from commentaries on jihad, the other great cultural response to the crusades came in the form of poetry. The Islamic states had a rich poetic culture with its roots in the pre-Muslim Arab world. The tone and structure of laments for vanished desert campsites were readily adapted to mourn the loss of towns and cities to the crusades.
Full Answer
Responses to the crusades touched every aspect of Muslim society, from politics to religion to culture. It was an experience that would transform locals just as much as crusaders. Jonathan Riley-Smith, ed. (1994), The Oxford Illustrated History of the Crusades.
While Crusaders came and fought the Seljuks, they were not fighting for the Byzantine emperor. They and the pope of the Catholic Church in Rome had their own religious goals, and many of the Crusaders were driven by a strong desire to win territory of their own. The Sunni Muslims, though, did not recognize this threat.
The Crusades are commonly thought of as a call to rescue Palestine from Moslem hands (Dubois and Brandt, 1956, p. 35), however this study will bring forth information that reveals that while the foregoing is true, it is not entirely accurate.
A whole body of poetry emerged, using different existing forms and genres, to celebrate the fight against the invading Christians. It explored and reinforced the identity of the local elite as Muslim warriors, depicting them in ways similar to stories of seventh-century camel raiding.
In Europe, the Crusades led to economic expansion; increased trade and use of money, which undermined serfdom and led to prosperity of northern Italian cities. They led to increased power of the monarchs, and, briefly, to increased power of the papacy.
What were the crusades? The crusades were wars to win back the Holy Land, Jerusalem, from Muslims or non Christians.
The Crusades increased religious tolerance among Muslims. The Crusades increased Muslims' distrust of Europeans. The Crusades increased the power of the Muslim empires. The Crusades increased the power of Constantinople.
What was one direct result of the Crusades? Trade increased between Europe and the Middle East. Islamic kingdoms expanded into Europe. Arabs and Christians divided the city of Jerusalem between them.
Terms in this set (10) What was the main objective of the Crusades? To liberate Palestine from the Muslims. When and how did Palestine become a hostile place for Christians? In the 11th century a band of Muslim warriors known as the Seljuk Turks swept over the holy land and captured Jerusalem and tortured Christians.
Through the 15th century, other church-sanctioned crusades were fought against heretical Christian sects, against the Byzantine and Ottoman empires, to combat paganism and heresy, and for political reasons. Unsanctioned by the church, Popular Crusades of ordinary citizens were also frequent.
The Crusades was a turning point in history because it depleted the population, made the relationships between religions very strained, and introduced a variety of new ideas and products to the Europeans/Crusaders.
For instance, the crusades caused the religions of Christianity, Judaism and Islam to clash. In this conflict, people of all faiths travelled vast distances to fight over the city of Jerusalem, which each faith considered important to its religious heritage.
What was one direct result of the Crusades? (1) Trade increased between Europe and the Middle East.
What was one effect of the expansion of Islam between 632 and 750? Armed conquest was forbidden by the caliphs. Cultural and commercial connections were established over a sizable region. A majority of the western European population converted.
Muslim Response to the Crusades and the Cairo/Baghdad Caliphate Split. In the late 1090s the European Crusaders in Syria and Palestine were fighting on foreign soil and in harsh, desert conditions to which they were not accustomed. They were far from their homelands and sources of supply. Further, their numbers were not very large;
The other is that Islam, the religion practiced by Muslims, was too divided for Muslims to mount a serious response to the Crusades.
They were far from their homelands and sources of supply. Further, their numbers were not very large; perhaps twenty thousand Crusaders made it to Jerusalem. After the city fell to the Crusaders in 1099, only a few thousand remained in Jerusalem and the other Crusader states, including Antioch, Edessa, and Tripoli.
At the time of the First Crusade (1095–99) and in the years that followed, a number of major "players" occupied the Middle East. Sunni Muslims: The Sunnis were the largest sect, or subgroup, of Muslims.
The First Crusade was called in response to pleas from the Byzantine emperor. The emperor of Byzantium, the seat of the Eastern Orthodox Christian religion, believed that he could drive the Seljuks out of Byzantine territory if he expanded his army with knights from Europe.
As the Crusaders made their way down the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea to Jerusalem, they occupied a number of cities, including Antioch and Edessa. To escape the Crusaders, many Muslim refugees from these cities fled farther inland to such cities as Damascus and Aleppo, both in Syria. There they began to demand a response to the Crusaders. One leader who listened to their pleas was al-Harawi, who was the chief qadi (a position similar to mayor) of Damascus. Al-Harawi traveled to Baghdad to persuade the Abbasid caliph, al-Mustazhir Billah, to send troops to confront the Crusaders.
Moreover, the Turkish sultan had problems of his own . He was young and inexperienced, and after the death of his father in 1094 he had to fight off rivals for the sultanate and even members of his own military. Syria and Palestine, to him, were distant outposts, so he showed little interest in helping.
In terms of history, the actual start and reasons for the Crusades varies slightly based upon the sources being accessed as well as the point of view from which this recalling of history is based.
To understand the Crusades, one must be aware of the history of Islamic rule and conquest that led to the occupation of Jerusalem.
The weaknesses in the Byzantine Empire, and among the Islamic Caliphs, saw the Seljuk Turks increase in strength as well as control and power, with their brutal tactics causing concern throughout the region (Yale, 1958, p. 12).
The success of the Islamic conquests, as opposed to their capturing the Holy Lands, looms as the reason for Byzantine Emperor Alexius Comnenus’ plea to Pope Urban 11. While the response to the call to arms was tremendous, the mounting of any actual response represented another matter. Conducting a crusade was not an inexpensive manner.
This study has set out to examine the various factors involved with the Crusades, delving deeper than traditional historical accounts to uncover the factors involved. In equating as to why the response to the Muslim takeover of the Holy Lands took so long, there are two parts to that query.
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: