Levin says that Amy Coney Barrett and “our heroes on the bench” were not able to be a “good Supreme Court justice”
The commonwealth judge is the hero in this entire matter; the appellate court in Pennsylvania got it right, because that judge was not driven by politics. She was not driven by a result-oriented decision. She was fearless in her defense of the rule of law.
From the December 8, 2020, edition of Westwood One's The Mark Levin Show. MARK LEVIN (HOST) As the gaggle of legal analysts go on cable TV and sit at their computers and write there their blogs, you don't have to be a legal scholar to figure out what's taking place in this country right now. An order was issued 40 minutes after ...
Number one: The states must comply with Article Two of the Constitution -- meaning state Supreme Courts, state governors, state election boards, state secretaries of state are free to change election laws that are used, at least in part, to select electors, period. Period.
It's not a matter of them getting involved in politics. They 're always involved in politics. What will happen now is any state Supreme Court and any state legislature can change election laws lawlessly, whether they violate their own constitution or whether they violate Article Two of the Constitution and they know the United States Supreme Court will do nothing. Nothing.