Juveniles should be tried as adults. There are benefits of trying juveniles as adults, most arguments that are found are against it, but research has found that it is very helpful. One of the benefits of trying juveniles as adults are that it minimizes and stops crimes committed by minors.
It provides a way to teach accountability. At some point, society needs to teach all youth, no matter what their home background may be, that there are actions which are permitted and ones that are not for the greater protection of everyone. Juveniles being tried as an adult is one way that we can begin this lesson.
7 Top Pros and Cons of Juveniles Being Tried As AdultsIf they are convicted as juveniles, they would gain freedom from the system at age 25. ... Deter and minimize crimes committed by minors. ... Brings justice to the victims. ... Correct a case of blind justice. ... Trial by jury. ... Minors will be put at risk.More items...•
Trying Juveniles as Adults, supra . A summary of six studies found that there was greater overall recidivism for juveniles prosecuted in adult court than juveniles whose crimes “matched” in juvenile court. Id. Juveniles in adult court also recidivated sooner and more frequently.
When we lock up young people, they are more likely to be exposed to extreme violence, fall prey to abuse, and suffer from illness. High rates of violence, unchecked gang activity, and overcrowding persist in Division of Juvenile Justice facilities where many youth sentenced as adults start their incarceration.
Juveniles don't have all of the same constitutional rights in juvenile proceedings as adults do. For example, juveniles' adjudication hearings are heard by judges because youthful offenders don't have the right to a trial by jury of their peers. They also don't have the right to bail or to a public trial.
Juveniles know right from wrong, should be held responsible for their behavior and should face consequences when they violate the law. The question is whether the way we respond to a juvenile who commits a serious crime should differ from how we respond when the same crime is committed by an adult.
Evaluation research of interventions with juvenile offenders has discovered a number of programs that are effective in reducing recidivism, especially for high-risk offenders, and meta-analyses of those studies have highlighted the program characteristics most strongly associated with positive and, in some cases, ...
a young personjuvenile. noun. plural juveniles. Definition of juvenile (Entry 2 of 2) 1a : a young person : youth often, specifically : an individual who is under an age fixed by law (such as 18 years) at which he or she would be charged as an adult for a criminal act …
CONCLUSION. A child who commits heinous crimes like rape and murder should be tried and offered punishment as adults. Juvenile courts should be tough to ensure juveniles do not take advantage of immunity from prosecution. Juveniles in rehabilitation should also be offered significant psychological help.
Juveniles are sane enough to differentiate between good and bad. Therefore, children can commit crimes as they have decided to choose the wrong path. Instead of rehabilitation, they should be tried as adults and given punishment so that other children don't commit such shameful acts.
Although minors may be aware of the distinction between right and wrong, immaturity should be a reason for them not being tried as an adult criminal. Criminal crimes committed by juveniles should be taken to the juvenile justice system because they are a stage of immaturity or going through negative peer-pressure.